CornBurrito
Member
Hence the term HOT coffee. That's like saying ice cream or ice cubes are too cold.
No it isn't. It was kept at hot that could cause third degree burns instantly. Coffee doesn't need to be that hot to be hot.
Hence the term HOT coffee. That's like saying ice cream or ice cubes are too cold.
Kohr claims the incident caused such severe stress it activated his Crohns disease which resulted in surgery to remove part of his intestine.
I dunno about you but when I order something based on BOILING WATER like Tea or Coffee I expect it to be around 90-100°C, just like I expect a new Knife to be sharp.
and the cup collapsed.
Is there even a way to reliably do that though? I don't drink coffee that much, is there a way to see how hot coffee was being brewed weeks after the coffee was brewed in the first place?
I dunno about you but when I order something based on BOILING WATER like Tea or Coffee I expect it to be around 90-100°C, just like I expect a new Knife to be sharp.
Jackie Chiles is on the case!
![]()
When will dumbasses learn to stop putting hot cups of coffee between their thighs?
Then you expect a cup of coffee which will give you severe scalding in your mouth.
Coffee (and other hot drinks) is usually served at around 75-80 degrees C. The water loses about 20 degrees from initial prep to serving.
I feel like most of the coffee I get is hot enough to severely scald my mouth. I don't even try to drink it for a while after buying it.
As far as the temperature goes - it's hot coffee. Typically, coffee tastes best when it is hot and I am sure this is a tough balance for Starbucks as there are probably customers who complain that the coffee isn't hot enough.
Pretty sure at most Starbucks locations (at least in my experience), you are handed hot drinks without a lid, and you put on your own lid.
As far as the temperature goes - it's hot coffee. Typically, coffee tastes best when it is hot and I am sure this is a tough balance for Starbucks as there are probably customers who complain that the coffee isn't hot enough.
Sounds like this an issue of mental health more than coffee though.
I have never seen a drink at Starbucks handed without a lid, for the exact reason that they don't want to spill it on you.Pretty sure at most Starbucks locations (at least in my experience), you are handed hot drinks without a lid, and you put on your own lid.
As far as the temperature goes - it's hot coffee. Typically, coffee tastes best when it is hot and I am sure this is a tough balance for Starbucks as there are probably customers who complain that the coffee isn't hot enough.
Sounds like this an issue of mental health more than coffee though.
Hence the term HOT coffee. That's like saying ice cream or ice cubes are too cold.
The case isn't about it being hot, its about the cup breaking. Having a "warning: hot" on the cup doesn't protect from the cup breaking unexpectedly, assuming the cup was indeed faulty.
That is speaking of the chrones disease and surgery needed that allegedly resulted from the spilt coffee.
Probably all fabricated though.
I have never seen a drink at Starbucks handed without a lid, for the exact reason that they don't want to spill it on you.
In before the Mcdonalds case.
I never knew the McDonald's case was that serious. That's insane!
I don't drink coffee.What type of barbarian are you that you use boiling water to brew coffee?
Whenever I hear such a story, I wonder if anyone has ever sued GAF after reading a post.
Whenever I hear such a story, I wonder if anyone has ever sued GAF after reading a post.
Claiming burns is one thing. A stupid thing, but one nevertheless. His argument goes way off into frivolous bullshit when he starts claiming that his Crohn's flared up solely due to the trauma of having some coffee spilled on himself. Next he's going to claim that his poor little burns gave him horrible PTSD and crippling depression.
a lot of people in here with no idea what they're talking about. starbucks could very well be liable even with a "hot liquid" warning on the cup. a warning doesn't give them the ability to serve people with what looks like boiling hot coffee (looking at his burns). be realistic. what if someone knocked the cup into a child's lap or something? "oh well the cup said hot on it people should have been handling it with tongs and a hazmat suit." give me a break
and citing the mcdonalds case even though it was completely horrific. tons of people mocked the women before realizing how hot the coffee was. even then some still roll their eyes at her suing them.
I expect coffee or tea to be brewed at 200F but not served. 80-120 is what it should be served at.
He's got burns for sure but nothing that would be unusual when given freshly made hot coffee. McDonalds coffee incident was serious, the injuries sustained were ridiculous and they had been previously warned about the extreme temperature of the coffee.
Not to mention that Starbucks always gives you a lid, and the extra sleeve for hot coffee. Unless you drop that from a pretty high point, chances are it won't spill all over the place.
Actually it wasn't. It was an SELF INTRODUCED accident. Yes the damage was real and it was rather unfortunate, but that's like suing a knife maker because you cut myself.
Why was the coffee served THAT hot to cause such severe burns?
Why are knifes so sharp that you can cut yourself?! Why does Alcohol has so much alcohol in it?! Questions upon questions.Why was the coffee served THAT hot to cause such severe burns?
I think this is really fascinating on another level. Americans often chuckle about the EU-"Nannystate" regarding consumer laws, but on the other hand you get coffee that is too hot and "professional driver do not attempt" in car commercials.