There are many competing and diverging interests that are taking full advantage of the idea of a highly contagious and deadly pandemic - exaggerated expertly by propagandists working at news outlets like the ones above - but some of the more exposed parties require those rushed, PR-approved vaccines to be injected into hundreds of millions before anything turns public perception around. That's both the good and the bad of the vaccines.
Like you touched on, they're being used to usher in a new state of biosecurity and they've already telegraphed this quite clearly so I hope no one still views that as some crazy theory. Denmark is developing a vaccine passport (
Reuters), Quantas Airlines' CEO has spoken about it (
USA Today/AP) and it goes well beyond flying as
CNN briefly touches on here:
If the public goes along with that rather than pushing back against it we're well on our way to that utopian (in their view) future the UN/World Economic Forum planned out for us years ago:
Notice how many governments doubled and tripled down on economy-crushing "public health" measures even after the evidence made it painfully clear they were doing much more harm than good? Dozens of studies against lock downs
here including The Lancet, Nature, NIH and NEJM.
The same applies to masks. Most bought into their effectiveness simply because "the experts"/authorities told them so. The beauty of this [not-so-]easily verifiable lie (most don't like to do their own research) is that it's playing psychological games. A mask is an easy way to signify you're doing something to fight "the invisible enemy," unaware that your fellow man/woman is the enemy in that scenario, and anyone not wearing one gets pressured/coerced into it.
If you trust the case reporting then it singlehandedly destroys the idea that masks help slow/stop the virus, many of the regions with highest compliance are also the ones that are hardest hit. A recent clip I stumbled across summed up everything I read from mask studies/opinions published prior to 2020:
To piggyback off what she says there:
Notice the unusual uniformity in messaging from the medical and scientific community in the mainstream media and most governments despite the glaring contradictions/flaws in so much of what we're doing?
There are tens of thousands of experienced doctors and scientists trying to speak out against the tests, the misattributed deaths, the measures in place and even the vaccines without mainstream platforms willing to air their views. That's not "following the science," it's the complete opposite, and they sometimes broadcast it loud and clear:
"Dr. Horacio Arruda, the [Quebec] province's health director, acknowledged Wednesday there is no hard scientific evidence to support a curfew's effectiveness." -
CBC
The government here never provided evidence the restaurants and bars demanded after it was somehow deemed necessary to close them down again in October. Other provinces and states south of the border have and their numbers definitely didn't support indoor dining bans. Most transmission happens at home... where we're being locked up.
This is a big, ugly mess that's complex and uncomfortable for many to talk about, they just want the day's hyperinflated numbers and to be told what to do in as few words as possible.
"Excess deaths," as it's been so commonly reported this past year, is often a half truth used to deceive because it doesn't take into account the extremely liberal approach to labeling covid cases. Again, a callback to the Johns Hopkins study that showed the rise in covid deaths led to a proportional drop in all other causes of deaths. The sensationalized reporting never factors that in, it just says "excess deaths number X" and lets you infer the worst. You gladly oblige.
The CDC itself, speaking of the US here, reported "2 out of 3 excess deaths were caused by covid." Another way of looking at it, 1 out of 3 excess deaths were caused by the hysteria and lockdowns. When you remove all the cases falsely attributed to covid you're left with a very serious issue on your hands: how do governments justify killing so many people? This isn't "public health."
There's so much statistical fraud happening and no one wants to admit it.
/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/advancelocal/6MC5XKFSABFPZLJCAA6TVYBLIE.jpg)
