mysticstylez
Banned
linkboy said:I
My take on the IGN fiasco.
If the editors didn't play Zelda and Matt is right, then that's a problem.
The problem is that you think thats a problem.
linkboy said:I
My take on the IGN fiasco.
If the editors didn't play Zelda and Matt is right, then that's a problem.
Mr_Furious said:When all is said and done, IGN's declaration of GOTY will not affect either Zelda's or Okami's (lack of) sales.
beelzebozo said:has anyone stated the obvious yet and said that okami is zelda-lite for people who have sworn off nintendo products?
...anyone?
mysticstylez said:The problem is that you think thats a problem.
That's one. Now there's only 999,999 left for this to matter.Odysseus said:not if i go out and buy okami and not zelda as a result of this
i'm just saying
it could happen
I think youre confusing it with 'Flags of our Fathers'ghostlyjoe said:"Letters from Iwo Jima" is third-rate trash. It's poorly made, poorly executed and just doesn't deserve the already limited screen time it gets.
Granted, I didn't actually see the movie, but that's not a problem, right? Are you Jack "Bully" Thompson, by any chance?
mysticstylez said:The problem is that you think thats a problem.
ghostlyjoe said:"Letters from Iwo Jima" is third-rate trash. It's poorly made, poorly executed and just doesn't deserve the already limited screen time it gets.
Granted, I didn't actually see the movie, but that's not a problem, right? Are you Jack "Bully" Thompson, by any chance?
linkboy said:Let me clarify what I mean.
If you have editors who are voting for IGN's GOTY and they haven't played all of the games on the list, then that's a problem. They're basically making an uninformed decision.
When they are chosing IGN's GOTY, they are representing IGN, not their personal lists (which I don't have a problem with them not putting Zelda on).
Its like a person handing out an Oscar for best picture and they haven't seen all of the movies that are up for it.
As I said in my original post, this is Matt's words against Mark's words, that's it.
Personally, it doesn't bother me that Zelda didn't win, as Okami is more then deserving to win it (as is Gears of War).
mysticstylez said:No, but when you say its a problem that people (on IGN) didn't play Zelda, thats LUDICROUS!
I see nothing wrong with each editor having to play each game in the top ten list. It is their job and if they are to voice a "valid" opinion about one game over the other, it's only fair that everyone be fully familiarized with the GOTY candidates.mysticstylez said:So you have to play every game on the list in order for your own vote to be vaild?
Thats BS.
jonezer4 said:It's a problem if people (anywhere) didn't play Zelda!
mysticstylez said:So you have to play every game on the list in order for your own vote to be vaild?
Thats BS.
linkboy said:If you aren't going to have people knowledgable on what they're voting on, then what is the point of having them vote in the first place.
Odysseus said:it's good enough for politics, it's good enough for games
beelzebozo said:has anyone stated the obvious yet and said that okami is zelda-lite for people who have sworn off nintendo products?
...anyone?
linkboy said:How is it BS? People who give reviews of movies watch them before giving them reviews and ratings. What, next were going to hear that people are going to start giving game reviews without playing the game in question (which probably happens more then people think).
If you aren't going to have people knowledgable on what they're voting on, then what is the point of having them vote in the first place.
As I said, I have NO issue with them not putting Zelda on their personal lists, that's their opinion and they're entitled to it. The IGN GOTY award is the award that all the IGN editors have said is, in their opinion, the best game for the past year. How can that award be taken seriously if the people who voted for it are not informed on what they're voting on.
Wrong. Read this thread again.mysticstylez said:What it boils down to it, people are mad that Zelda didn't win and they are trying to find the lamest reasons as to why IGN's votes are invalid.
Mr_Furious said:Wrong. Read this thread again.
mysticstylez said:What it boils down to it, people are mad that Zelda didn't win and they are trying to find the lamest reasons as to why IGN's votes are invalid.
linkboy said:If you aren't going to have people knowledgable on what they're voting on, then what is the point of having them vote in the first place.
Correct. Read the thread before spouting off assumptions about a topic you know nothing about.mysticstylez said:I guess my opinion isn't vaild cause I didn't read this whole 12 page thread, thus I wasn't well "informed" to make an opinion.
mysticstylez said:So you have to play every game on the list in order for your own vote to be vaild?
Thats BS.
Mr Toast said:I think if you didnt play all the games, you can only be expected to vote for the ones you did. Vote for what you like, there's no obligation to vote for something you didnt play..
drohne said:okami isn't even a special case. every perceived threat to a nintendo game gets this treatment. nintendo fandom is an impairment, and i'm happy to report that i haven't got anything comparable.
drohne said:okami isn't even a special case. every perceived threat to a nintendo game gets this treatment. nintendo fandom is an impairment, and i'm happy to report that i haven't got anything comparable.
Branduil said:This is the best post ever because it's so hilariously ironic and I'm sure drohne doesn't even realize it.
Odysseus said:there's nothing ironic about it all, jilted wiitards are something special
Branduil said:But what's comparable to gamers who hate games?
Ah ah ah ah Ah, boobies! The greatest logic impairer of all!drohne said:okami isn't even a special case. every perceived threat to a nintendo game gets this treatment. nintendo fandom is an impairment, and i'm happy to report that i haven't got anything comparable.
linkboy said:How is it BS? People who give reviews of movies watch them before giving them reviews and ratings. What, next were going to hear that people are going to start giving game reviews without playing the game in question (which probably happens more then people think).
If you aren't going to have people knowledgable on what they're voting on, then what is the point of having them vote in the first place.
As I said, I have NO issue with them not putting Zelda on their personal lists, that's their opinion and they're entitled to it. The IGN GOTY award is the award that all the IGN editors have said is, in their opinion, the best game for the past year. How can that award be taken seriously if the people who voted for it are not informed on what they're voting on.
argon said:But given a list that includes games you haven't played yet, you aren't exactly making an informed decision by choosing the GOTY among those games.
brandonh83 said:Well if you don't like amazing game design I could see how TP wouldn't do anything for you.
Not knowing whether or not you like the game doesn't mean you can't make a qualified and knowledgable vote on it either, apparently.mysticstylez said:Amazing game design doesn't mean you have to like the game.
haircut said:Not knowing whether or not you like the game doesn't mean you can't make a qualified and knowledgable vote on it either, apparently.