• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Medicating Women’s Feelings (NYTimes)

Status
Not open for further replies.

entremet

Member
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/01/o...=Full&region=Marginalia&src=me&pgtype=article

These are observations rooted in biology, not intended to mesh with any kind of pro- or anti-feminist ideology. But they do have social implications. Women’s emotionality is a sign of health, not disease; it is a source of power. But we are under constant pressure to restrain our emotional lives. We have been taught to apologize for our tears, to suppress our anger and to fear being called hysterical.

The pharmaceutical industry plays on that fear, targeting women in a barrage of advertising on daytime talk shows and in magazines. More Americans are on psychiatric medications than ever before, and in my experience they are staying on them far longer than was ever intended. Sales of antidepressants and antianxiety meds have been booming in the past two decades, and they’ve recently been outpaced by an antipsychotic, Abilify, that is the No. 1 seller among all drugs in the United States, not just psychiatric ones.

As a psychiatrist practicing for 20 years, I must tell you, this is insane.

At least one in four women in America now takes a psychiatric medication, compared with one in seven men. Women are nearly twice as likely to receive a diagnosis of depression or anxiety disorder than men are. For many women, these drugs greatly improve their lives. But for others they aren’t necessary. The increase in prescriptions for psychiatric medications, often by doctors in other specialties, is creating a new normal, encouraging more women to seek chemical assistance. Whether a woman needs these drugs should be a medical decision, not a response to peer pressure and consumerism.

The new, medicated normal is at odds with women’s dynamic biology; brain and body chemicals are meant to be in flux. To simplify things, think of serotonin as the “it’s all good” brain chemical. Too high and you don’t care much about anything; too low and everything seems like a problem to be fixed.

In the days leading up to menstruation, when emotional sensitivity is heightened, women may feel less insulated, more irritable or dissatisfied. I tell my patients that the thoughts and feelings that come up during this phase are genuine, and perhaps it’s best to re-evaluate what they put up with the rest of the month, when their hormone and neurotransmitter levels are more likely programmed to prompt them to be accommodating to others’ demands and needs.

The most common antidepressants, which are also used to treat anxiety, are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (S.S.R.I.s) that enhance serotonin transmission. S.S.R.I.s keep things “all good.” But too good is no good. More serotonin might lengthen your short fuse and quell your fears, but it also helps to numb you, physically and emotionally. These medicines frequently leave women less interested in sex. S.S.R.I.s tend to blunt negative feelings more than they boost positive ones. On S.S.R.I.s, you probably won’t be skipping around with a grin; it’s just that you stay more rational and less emotional. Some people on S.S.R.I.s have also reported less of many other human traits: empathy, irritation, sadness, erotic dreaming, creativity, anger, expression of their feelings, mourning and worry.

This article surprised the heck out of me. One in Four women in America are on psychiatric medication? That's a crazy stat.

The author of this piece believes that they are being overprescribed. This reminds of the how ADHD seems to be everywhere in the school system.

Either a huge shift in mental health for real occurred or pharmaceutical companies are really pushing these drugs.
 
I wonder what's the reasoning on this?

This is specifically a big deal with American women, not women in other countries.
 
That sounds fucking insane. Sure, psychiatric medicine helps, but it should be seen as close to a last resort. Something must be pushing the drugs really hard to have so many people using them.
 
Let's have pharmaceutical companies be able to market directly to consumers and doctors. What could possibly go wrong?
 
At least one in four women in America now takes a psychiatric medication, compared with one in seven men. Women are nearly twice as likely to receive a diagnosis of depression or anxiety disorder than men are. For many women, these drugs greatly improve their lives. But for others they aren’t necessary. The increase in prescriptions for psychiatric medications, often by doctors in other specialties, is creating a new normal, encouraging more women to seek chemical assistance. Whether a woman needs these drugs should be a medical decision, not a response to peer pressure and consumerism.

Wish the author had elaborated here; who exactly is prescribing these meds, if not medical professionals?

How can the author determine what is a "normal" level of patients within the populace (in order to come to the conclusion that we're being overmedicated)? How do we know that our western society isn't creating an environment that is damaging to women's mental health?

A few quotes from a few people who've done some research on the matter would have really helped here.

Edit: NVM, the article is more or a less a summary of a much larger work by the same author.
 
My mom has really severe anxiety issues. Like, life crippling issues with stress and anxiety. She used to have panic attacks at the drop of a glass (quite literally). She absolutely has to have her medication and it makes a huge positive impact on her life.

But every so often she goes off of them "because I feel fine." And then after a few months she starts being crazy again and we need to get her to a doctor.

So not all psychiatric drugs are necessarily bad or shouldn't be taken long term. Certainly they've made a major improvement in my mom's life (and me by extension, since I was the only one in our house who knew how to calm her down during an attack).
 
I'm curious why your excerpt cut the lead paragraph, which sets the context and to which the second paragraph directly refers Here's the opening:

Women are moody. By evolutionary design, we are hard-wired to be sensitive to our environments, empathic to our children’s needs and intuitive of our partners’ intentions. This is basic to our survival and that of our offspring. Some research suggests that women are often better at articulating their feelings than men because as the female brain develops, more capacity is reserved for language, memory, hearing and observing emotions in others

I'm not on board with everything she says, but I do think that this recognition is largely correct and underpins her critique of overmedication; the assertion is that women's emotional lives are inherently more embedded (in their immediate environment, loved ones, etc) and more attuned to changes in that world, therefore more "volatile" in a general sense. The overmedication then follows from this fact in combination with our culture's desire to deem that to be irrational or unacceptable, since one should be well-adapted and happy at all times.

Of course, I also think that it's worth reconsidering whether it should be so widespread for women to spend most of their lives on medication that completely suppresses their menstrual cycle, as some popular BC pills do, which is like medicating away being female as a kind of inherent problem.
 
Wish the author had elaborated here; who exactly is prescribing these meds, if not medical professionals?

How can the author determine what is a "normal" level of patients within the populace (in order to come to the conclusion that we're being overmedicated)? How do we know that our western society isn't creating an environment that is damaging to women's mental health?

A few quotes from a few people who've done some research on the matter would have really helped here.

To fair it's an op-ed.

I would love to see more rigorous reporting on this. Seems like it's a topic rife for deeper information and reporting.
 
Drugs over-prescribed in the USA? Who would have thought it?
I thought it was common knowledge that drugs for "emotional conditions" were seriously over-prescribed. I mean there is so much money to make out of peoples state of mind. You're just a self-medicating mule for the drugs companies and psychiatrists who have a contract with them to consume as much uneeded drugs as they can convince you to swallow.
0 surprises here.
 
Drugs over-prescribed in the USA? Who would have thought it?
I thought it was common knowledge that drugs for "emotional conditions" were seriously over-prescribed. I mean there is so much money to make out of peoples state of mind. You're just a self-medicating mule for the drugs companies and psychiatrists who have a contract with them to consume as much uneeded drugs as they can convince you to swallow.
0 surprises here.

How do you determine who needs drugs for "emotional conditions"?
 
This is sad to me, but the male stat is sad too. However it's not surprising, I know so many people who turn to meds and doctors who prescribe them for "in case this could help."
 
I have experience taking SSRIs/Anti-depressants (Lexapro, Wellbutrin, Cymbalta, etc...) for chronic pain caused by depression/anxiety.

For me personally, the benefits do not outweigh the side effects. So I try my best to stay off them (haven't taken anything in about a year).

Of course, these drugs can absolutely benefit people. I would always encourage someone to talk to their doctor and ask their advice for the best course of action.

I've never once had a doctor "push" something on me.
 
To fair it's an op-ed.

I would love to see more rigorous reporting on this. Seems like it's a topic rife for deeper information and reporting.

See my edit, in the fine print it says she's written a book on the topic. The op-ed covers the material in the broadest of strokes, there isn't much to discuss there except the premise.
 
I'm curious why your excerpt cut the lead paragraph, which sets the context and to which the second paragraph directly refers Here's the opening:



I'm not on board with everything she says, but I do think that this recognition is largely correct and underpins her critique of overmedication; the assertion is that women's emotional lives are inherently more embedded (in their immediate environment, loved ones, etc) and more attuned to changes in that world, therefore more "volatile" in a general sense. The overmedication then follows from this fact in combination with our culture's desire to deem that to be irrational or unacceptable, since one should be well-adapted and happy at all times.
I don't post full articles. The link is there for those who want to read the full thing.
The stats were my biggest interest.
 
Drugs over-prescribed in the USA? Who would have thought it?
I thought it was common knowledge that drugs for "emotional conditions" were seriously over-prescribed. I mean there is so much money to make out of peoples state of mind. You're just a self-medicating mule for the drugs companies and psychiatrists who have a contract with them to consume as much uneeded drugs as they can convince you to swallow.
0 surprises here.

Can we please not forget about the people that actually need these medications to functionally properly day to day? Out of my group of friends and myself included, we took medications because it legitimately helped, not just because a doctor told us to take it.
 
Doctors today, at least in my experience, seem way too quick to go the anxiety route. I had massive stomach pains a few years ago that lasted for a few months. I went to several doctors and was prescribed Xanax by one and Lexapro by another. It didn't help so I went to another doctor who finally told me it was an issue with food I was eating so I cut it out and now I'm fine. My mom is having some of the same symptoms as well and they're trying to get her to take anxiety meds too.

The medications are necessary for those that need it but it seems that doctors are too quick to run to anxiety.
 
I have experience taking SSRIs/Anti-depressants (Lexapro, Wellbutrin, Cymbalta, etc...) for chronic pain caused by depression/anxiety.

For me personally, the benefits do not outweigh the side effects. So I try my best to stay off them (haven't taken anything in about a year).

Of course, these drugs can absolutely benefit people. I would always encourage someone to talk to their doctor and ask their advice for the best course of action.

I've never once had a doctor "push" something on me.
I was put on SSRIs because of "depression" years ago, that it turns out was caused by a combination of other medical factors. Complete disaster, made things worse, because no one actually bothered to check for physical issues first. (I will also chime in as another person with food-triggered anxiety.)
 
See my edit, in the fine print it says she's written a book on the topic. The op-ed covers the material in the broadest of strokes, there isn't much to discuss there except the premise.

Well this is in the article as well:

Medical chart reviews consistently show that doctors are more likely to give women psychiatric medications than men, especially women between the ages of 35 and 64. For some women in that age group the symptoms of perimenopause can sound a lot like depression, and tears are common. Crying isn’t just about sadness. When we are scared, or frustrated, when we see injustice, when we are deeply touched by the poignancy of humanity, we cry. And some women cry more easily than others. It doesn’t mean we’re weak or out of control. At higher doses, S.S.R.I.s make it difficult to cry. They can also promote apathy and indifference. Change comes from the discomfort and awareness that something is wrong; we know what’s right only when we feel it. If medicated means complacent, it helps no one.

Women are more likely to be prescribed these than men from doctors.

What's interesting is that men have higher suicide rates, but the traditional masculine stoicism tends to mask it, while women's traditional emotional expressiveness is used to put them on more drugs.

I say "traditional" since obviously notallmen/notallwomen.
 
In many cases feelings of depression and anxiety are exacerbated by nutrition. People who don't get enough vitamins and minerals will likely feel more prone to depression and anxiety than those that do. Vitamin D is a big factor, especially in the winter.

But people aren't told this. They keep buying their nasty frozen and processed foods, don't take supplements where they are lacking, and keep going on life changing medication when they don't need it.

My wife was on an SSRI for a few months and she lost the ability to orgasm while on it. We researched and saw that wasn't uncommon and it could become permanent. So we took her off and we changed our diets (90% fresh food now) and started taking supplements and her problems with depression have vastly improved. Going off hormonal birth control also greatly helped.
 
I was put on SSRIs because of "depression" years ago, that it turns out was caused by a combination of other medical factors. Complete disaster, made things worse, because no one actually bothered to check for physical issues first.

I had all physical possibilities exhausted including an MRI and EKG (at my request). I refused to believe for the longest time that there wasn't anything physically wrong with my body that would cause pain.
 
Wish the author had elaborated here; who exactly is prescribing these meds, if not medical professionals?

How can the author determine what is a "normal" level of patients within the populace (in order to come to the conclusion that we're being overmedicated)? How do we know that our western society isn't creating an environment that is damaging to women's mental health?

A few quotes from a few people who've done some research on the matter would have really helped here.

Edit: NVM, the article is more or a less a summary of a much larger work by the same author.

Most women can just walk into their basic Dr office and say i have been feeling anxious and get a small dosage of pretty much anything. Its not right, but at least it gives people who do really need the medication the ability to obtain it but so many of these are treating the symptoms and not the problem, that a counselor or psych could figure out over time and help them without medication, all while keeping the womans sex drive intact. Anti depressants and anxiety kill all but the strongest libidos. its painful to read about.
 
This just reminds me of years and years ago, I was straight-up dogpiled with half a metric ton of bile on the Penny-Arcade forums for suggesting over-prescription was becoming a legitimate problem. With statistics like that, I rest my case.
 
Doctors today, at least in my experience, seem way too quick to go the anxiety route. I had massive stomach pains a few years ago that lasted for a few months. I went to several doctors and was prescribed Xanax by one and Lexapro by another. It didn't help so I went to another doctor who finally told me it was an issue with food I was eating so I cut it out and now I'm fine. My mom is having some of the same symptoms as well and they're trying to get her to take anxiety meds too.

The medications are necessary for those that need it but it seems that doctors are too quick to run to anxiety.

I was put on SSRIs because of "depression" years ago, that it turns out was caused by a combination of other medical factors. Complete disaster, made things worse, because no one actually bothered to check for physical issues first.

I think it's time to find a new doctor and stop visiting the rookie or vet MD's who are just trying to pad their pockets. That's the beauty of healthcare in America, you can just go pick a new doctor.

Also have either of you mentioned anything about anxiety or told them "I dont think it's anxiety, Doc"?

You're there to see them and have them treat you for your problems, but it's up to YOU to correctly describe what's happening. If someone went in and told a MD "I have really bad stomach aches for 2 months", why would he prescribe you Xanax?
 
I have to say that this article seems horribly done. It assumes the premise is true and goes from there instead of actually proving the premise.The stats are out of context and easily explained by many other factors that the author chooses to ignore.

I would argue that a lot of this is based on the societal norms are more accepting of people (especially women) going to a psychiatrist to assess their mental health. I find it irritating that the tone of this article paints this as a bad thing. Why is the fact that more people than ever before being on medication is considered bad? Medicine for mental health has improved leaps and bounds in the past two decades.
 
i wish that the general public would also be more informed on the havok all these drugs are creating on water and aquatic systems.

people take these drugs, piss them into the toilet, it's carried by urine into sewage system which eventually make their way back to the sea.
 
It is probably part of the reason why women have less suicide rates, so I wouldn't go demonizing these medications. We need less restrictions on all kinds of drugs, not more.
 
I have to say that this article seems horribly done. It assumes the premise is true and goes from there instead of actually proving the premise.The stats are out of context and easily explained by many other factors that the author chooses to ignore.

I would argue that a lot of this is based on the societal norms are more accepting of people (especially women) going to a psychiatrist to assess their mental health. I find it irritating that the tone of this article paints this as a bad thing. Why is the fact that more people than ever before being on medication is considered bad? Medicine for mental health has improved leaps and bounds in the past two decades.

The article and people here have mentioned the side effects. Those are pretty real and measurable.

It is probably part of the reason why women have less suicide rates, so I wouldn't go demonizing these medications. We need less restrictions on all kinds of drugs, not more.

There's no demonizing, just concern over them getting overprescribed. Why is this unique to America for example? Is America a generally more depressing place?
 
This article surprised the heck out of me. One in Four women in America are on psychiatric medication? That's a crazy stat.

No that's a bullshit statistic. Look what happens when you trace it backwards

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/16/women-and-prescription-drug-use_n_1098023.html
which links to medco.com

http://medco.mediaroom.com/

medco.com is actually now this:
https://www.express-scripts.com/

This isn't a study, this from 2011.

Lazy reporting, lazy science, lazy op-ed
facepalm.gif
 
I think it's time to find a new doctor and stop visiting the rookie or vet MD's who are just trying to pad their pockets. That's the beauty of healthcare in America, you can just go pick a new doctor.

Also have either of you mentioned anything about anxiety or told them "I dont think it's anxiety, Doc"?

You're there to see them and have them treat you for your problems, but it's up to YOU to correctly describe what's happening. If someone went in and told a MD "I have really bad stomach aches for 2 months", why would he prescribe you Xanax?
I know what's going on now- the problem was that at 20 and with a condition (hemochromatosis) that had been completely missed for 2 decades (wasn't caught till the third) alongside a food intolerance, I just didn't know any better re: doctors/meds/exhausting diagnostics first.
 
This article surprised the heck out of me. One in Four women in America are on psychiatric medication? That's a crazy stat.
That is scary. That means 3/4 of American woman are going around without their meds. OK, OK, poor taste.

Yeah, this is very worrying to me as a father of a young girl, because it starts with the cultural norms these women are exposed to.
 
I see that Lise Eliot, the author of "Pink Brain, Blue Brain," weighed in in the comment section:

Incredible: two articles in one Sunday Review propagating the myth of "hardwired" brain differences between males and females. This article and the Sunday Dialogue on boys' education both rely on pseudoscience as the foundation of their argument. At least Dr. Holland recognizes that the differential treatment of women's depression is over-reaction and unhelpful. In Mr. Kullman's thread (which allowed no reader comments), the "hardwired" assumption is taken verbatim by nearly all the contributors. (I sent a response, but my letter was not published.) All I can say is "show me the data:" studies of sex difference in the brain show very subtle, mostly insignificant differences and virtually none in children. In other words, the small brain differences that exist between men and women are learned, not "hardwired," and when it comes to boys' education and women's emotional regulation, the more we communicate the real neuroscience, that "you are what you do with your brain," the less we will pigeon-hole young boys and adult women into stereotypes that deny the fundamental emotional and cognitive potential of all humans.

Lise Eliot, PhD, author of "Pink Brain, Blue Brain"
Dept. Neuroscience, Chicago Medical School

The "hard wired statement" that kicks off the article can be debated. A study came out recently that actually does show differences between men and women when it comes to processing emotionally evocative imagery; however, the article on it in the Washington Post also makes it clear that the researchers don't know if this is an innate difference or a learned one.

A total of 3,398 men and women ranging from 18 to 38 years old participated in the study. First, they were shown 72 images of natural scenes that were categorized as positive, neutral or negative. For example, they showed pictures of cute cats (positive), houses (neutral) and accidents (negative).

The participants rated how positive, negative or neutral the images were, and then how emotionally stimulating they were. The women rated the negative and positive images as having more impact than the men did.

To test their memories, the researchers distracted the participants for 10 minutes and then asked them to recall some of the images they saw. Women outperformed men on freely remembering all types of images.

Researchers also looked at fMRI data from 696 of the participants and found that women had more brain activity, especially in motor regions, than men when they looked at negative images.

It was already known that people tend to better remember emotionally stimulating things and that women outperform men on memory tests. "One could speculate that if women react stronger to arousing information, it could explain part of their memory advantage in comparison to men," Milnik said, which is why they looked into that question.

But women were better at recalling all kinds of images, especially positive ones. "This would suggest that gender-dependent differences in emotional processing and memory are due to different mechanisms," Milnik said in a statement.

Researchers don't know why women's brains were more active than men's when looking at negative images, and whether it's a question of an innate quality or one that's the result of social conditioning. But Milnik said the findings help further the understanding around whether there are gender-specific mechanisms that control intense and shifting emotional responses.

"Women are more likely to develop major depression, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder, all of which are related to emotional dysregulation," she said.

Anyway, I've been on anti-depressants for a good 12 years or so (with a few breaks, and switching between different types). My current prescription is for 60mg of Cymbalta per day. I can't see myself coming off these anytime soon. (Personally speaking, I don't really consider "emotionality" to be a strength of mine, or a source of power. On the contrary, my depression and anxiety has been a terrible burden, and medication has been rather vital to keeping myself healthy.)
 
It is probably part of the reason why women have less suicide rates, so I wouldn't go demonizing these medications. We need less restrictions on all kinds of drugs, not more.

Probably true.

I think it's pretty astounding how many people are on some sort of medication, but I can't really think of anyone I know that I don't think should be on them. They're genuinely happier, more productive people on them. They agree and I agree.

But at the same time it just seems weird that we as humans or they as women would need so much. I think it might speak to our society as a whole and say we might have something set up wrong for our biology if we need meds at this kind of rate. How to fix that is beyond me. In the meantime I'm thankful that people can lead happy healthy lives because of meds.
 
No that's a bullshit statistic. Look what happens when you trace it backwards

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/16/women-and-prescription-drug-use_n_1098023.html
which links to medco.com

http://medco.mediaroom.com/

medco.com is actually now this:
https://www.express-scripts.com/

This isn't a study, this from 2011.

Lazy reporting, lazy science, lazy op-ed
facepalm.gif

This what I found directly from the CDC. It's also 2011, but collecting and analyzing this data takes time:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db76.htm

And here's one of the point extrapolated from that data:

Twenty-three percent of women aged 40–59 take antidepressants, more than in any other age-sex group.
 
This reads like anti SSRI propaganda. Its not surprising a lot of the statements are taken to be true and not backed up (the notion that anxious emotions are more "healthy")

Its also no surprise the author is trying to sell a self help book.
Probably true.

I think it's pretty astounding how many people are on some sort of medication, but I can't really think of anyone I know that I don't think should be on them. They're genuinely happier, more productive people on them. They agree and I agree.

But at the same time it just seems weird that we as humans or they as women would need so much.
I think it might speak to our society as a whole and say we might have something set up wrong for our biology if we need meds at this kind of rate. How to fix that is beyond me. In the meantime I'm thankful that people can lead happy healthy lives because of meds.
Why is it weird? Pretty much all of medicine is stuff like this.

We don't need it. We'd just die at 25 though.
 
We have been taught to apologize for our tears, to suppress our anger and to fear being called hysterical.

Maybe listen to that one.

One in four is insane, but also believable. Over medication is a massive issue, and I want it to be the next big crusade

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009–2010
More than 2 in 3 adults are considered to be overweight or obese.
More than 1 in 3 adults are considered to be obese.
More than 1 in 20 adults are considered to have extreme obesity.
About one-third of children and adolescents ages 6 to 19 are considered to be overweight or obese.
More than 1 in 6 children and adolescents ages 6 to 19 are considered to be obese.

We haven't even finished with the last one though.
 
Wish the author had elaborated here; who exactly is prescribing these meds, if not medical professionals?
Shes not saying medical professionals aren't prescribing them, she's saying doctors that don't specialize in psychiatry are prescribing psychiatric medicines, when they probably shouldnt be.



I would bet that some of these people on psychiatric medicine probably don't need to be on it but would benefit from different learned skills and therapy like DBT and CBT.
 
Would you have guessed that they were giving them to women at higher rates than men? Cause that's what the article is about.


Actually yes, I would have. Overmedication is a serious issue in this country, and anyone who isn't blind, deaf, and stupid can tell they market it more towards women in general.

That being said, fuck psychiatrists. Such a shady fucking industry, needs to be burned to the ground and rebuilt from scratch.

Edit: That was odd.....
 
It is probably part of the reason why women have less suicide rates, so I wouldn't go demonizing these medications. We need less restrictions on all kinds of drugs, not more.

I don't think so at all. I think it's more related to social pressure about succeeding in life (career, etc) which is harder on men than women, imo.

Compare suicide rates between sexes in other countries where this over prescription of antidepressants for women isn't a thing.
 
The article and people here have mentioned the side effects. Those are pretty real and measurable.



There's no demonizing, just concern over them getting overprescribed. Why is this unique to America for example? Is America a generally more depressing place?
I am familiar with the side effects. I have been on many different medications for years. I am currently not on any but I am about as close to the issue as you could get.

My problem wasn't the side effects. My issue stems from the authors premise, which seems to be to me that women are over prescribed psychiatric medication because they are women and therefor emotional.

This premise is never proven. Women are prescribed more than men but more women go to psychiatrists then men. For a lot of men it is seen (wrongfully) as shameful to admit weakness and accept that you have feelings that you need help with. As pointed out earlier, more men die of suicide than women so it seems like if we have a problem with a gender not being responsible with their mental health it is men.

It is also "supported" by the fact that more women are on medication than in the past. This implies that the old way was better but is never proven or even supported. Public awareness was a lot less in the past. I am arguing that we are making progress and that articles like that harm the progress.

The author than cites her own anecdotal evidence of people staying on medication longer than she deems good.

No that's a bullshit statistic. Look what happens when you trace it backwards

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/16/women-and-prescription-drug-use_n_1098023.html
which links to medco.com

http://medco.mediaroom.com/

medco.com is actually now this:
https://www.express-scripts.com/

This isn't a study, this from 2011.

Lazy reporting, lazy science, lazy op-ed
facepalm.gif

Thank you. I was also lazy and didn't feel like researching this but the article smells strongly of bullshit.
 
There's no demonizing, just concern over them getting overprescribed. Why is this unique to America for example? Is America a generally more depressing place?

America is not a depressing place, but you can fall on hard times more easy than in many other first world countries. And yet still it manages to have a lower suicide rate than some European countries and Japan. Is it a stretch to think we live in a more stressful world and therefore more and more people need these drugs to properly function in it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom