Maybe DMC2![]()
Did you seriously just pull that shit?
If you can provide legitimate complaints that don't regard the design or change of Dante, I'll hear you out, but often I never hear any of those legitimate complaints. Feel free to discuss those if you'd like, but I presented my case about why DmC is better as a game.This is a falsehood perpetuated only by people so desperate to defend DmC that they'll make a point of attempting to invalidate any dissenting opinion without even hearing the arguments against the game.
That would be the one thing DmC actually manages to be better than. Which says very little.Maybe DMC2![]()
That's really not something to be proud of.Indeed I did.
NT's take on Dante is the least of this game's problems, and I, as well as many other people on this board, have said what's wrong with this game on countless occasions only for people in favor of the game to dismiss them as "haters gonna hate". The weak enemy design (and the ridiculous color-coded ones), the poorly handled boss fights, the lack of difficulty, the hold trigger to style switch nonsense carried over from Heavenly Sword...all brought up in the past. The fact that the game only turned out as well as it did thanks to Capcom Japan holding their hands the whole way doesn't bode well at all. Sound effects, from gunfire to hit effects, were weak and sounded completely off, and the music was terrible. The animations were poor and clunky, and none of the hits had any sense of impact. Wasn't fond of the voice-acting, either (Dante always sounded mumbly and bored, and it reflected poorly on Vergil being a character using a Japanese sword with a name that he couldn't even pronounce). Art direction is more subjective, but I personally didn't care for the oversaturation, and wasn't impressed by the They Live and Inception mimicry.If you can provide legitimate complaints that don't regard the design or change of Dante, I'll hear you out, but often I never hear any of those legitimate complaints. Feel free to discuss those if you'd like, but I presented my case about why DmC is better as a game.
I like the DMC franchise but a huge problem I have with it is the gating of the combat system. I wish the game would just let me play, the first time through I always feel gimped as shit. The type of shit you see in the combo videos that everyone loves so much is with either 2-3 runs through the main game or, a whole lot of grinding for red orbs/proud souls. With the combat system being the meat and potatoes of the franchise it's plain idiotic.
Other games like Bayo and MGR to an extent, feel a lot better the first time you pick up the controller.
DmC is actually the better game. The combat is much more multifaceted, while MGR is a lot more one dimensional. You can "stealth" in MGR, but it's not fun. MGR is "more fun" because it's easier to be a bad ass, but I'll stand by the statement that DmC is a better made game, all around.
A lot of people just hating on DmC because of the new character. Is he annoying? Sorta, is he any worse than the old Dante? No. Both are ridiculous, so I don't see why there is whiny banter regarding it.
I guarantee you that the biggest complainers of DmC have never played it. It's one of the best in the series.
COME AT ME BROS!
Bait. This post is awful
If you can provide legitimate complaints that don't regard the design or change of Dante, I'll hear you out, but often I never hear any of those legitimate complaints. Feel free to discuss those if you'd like, but I presented my case about why DmC is better as a game.
I presented an argument, and you disregard the whole post as "bait" and "awful" because I call out something that has happened to DmC. Hell, a lot of people even hate MGR because it is some sort of "bastardization" of the Metal Gear universe. What people don't realize is that if they remember, for one second, that it's not a "MG Solid" game but instead a spin off, that it's pretty good.
Same goes for DmC. People need to look past the new character and play the game. In my opinion, DmC is on top.
DmC is actually the better game. The combat is much more multifaceted, while MGR is a lot more one dimensional. You can "stealth" in MGR, but it's not fun. MGR is "more fun" because it's easier to be a bad ass, but I'll stand by the statement that DmC is a better made game, all around.
A lot of people just hating on DmC because of the new character. Is he annoying? Sorta, is he any worse than the old Dante? No. Both are ridiculous, so I don't see why there is whiny banter regarding it.
I guarantee you that the biggest complainers of DmC have never played it. It's one of the best in the series.
COME AT ME BROS!
I presented an argument, and you disregard the whole post as "bait" and "awful" because I call out something that has happened to DmC. Hell, a lot of people even hate MGR because it is some sort of "bastardization" of the Metal Gear universe. What people don't realize is that if they remember, for one second, that it's not a "MG Solid" game but instead a spin off, that it's pretty good.
Same goes for DmC. People need to look past the new character and play the game. In my opinion, DmC is on top.
Hell, a lot of people even hate MGR because it is some sort of "bastardization" of the Metal Gear universe.
If you can provide legitimate complaints that don't regard the design or change of Dante, I'll hear you out, but often I never hear any of those legitimate complaints. Feel free to discuss those if you'd like, but I presented my case about why DmC is better as a game.
"Fuck all these limp-dick lawyers and chicken-shit bureaucrats. Fuck this 24/7 internet spew of trivia and bullshit. Fuck American pride, fuck the media. Fuck all of it!"
Yea, MGR.
It's designed for multiple play-throughs really and the same can be said of Bayonetta and MGR since you don't get everything your first play-through and have to replay on higher difficulties to get certain weapons.
Bayonetta with no upgrades feels great. A few hours into the game, you've already got a few weapons available and maybe crow/panther. A whole bunch of options already. None of the DMCs come close to that. Sure there has more unlockables, but you've got the gist of the game already. DMC doesn't give you the gist until you've played it twice.
The reason why this doesn't bother me is because when playing a DMC game, I view DMD as the real playthrough, the real test of my abilities, the real evaluation of the game's combat system. The first two difficulties are scrimmages before the big game. Bayonetta's NSIC was actually a disappointment in this regard.Bayonetta with no upgrades feels great. A few hours into the game, you've already got a few weapons available and maybe crow/panther. A whole bunch of options already. None of the DMCs come close to that. Sure there has more unlockables, but you've got the gist of the game already. DMC doesn't give you the gist until you've played it twice.
Bayonetta with no upgrades feels great. A few hours into the game, you've already got a few weapons available and maybe crow/panther. A whole bunch of options already. None of the DMCs come close to that. Sure there has more unlockables, but you've got the gist of the game already. DMC doesn't give you the gist until you've played it twice.
Seriously, this is a huge complaint with the DMC games. For fuck's sake, you don't even get to start with Stinger/Streak.
Also check out bayonetta. That is action perfected.
DmC is actually the better game. The combat is much more multifaceted, while MGR is a lot more one dimensional. You can "stealth" in MGR, but it's not fun. MGR is "more fun" because it's easier to be a bad ass, but I'll stand by the statement that DmC is a better made game, all around.
A lot of people just hating on DmC because of the new character. Is he annoying? Sorta, is he any worse than the old Dante? No. Both are ridiculous, so I don't see why there is whiny banter regarding it.
I guarantee you that the biggest complainers of DmC have never played it. It's one of the best in the series.
COME AT ME BROS!
Indeed I did.
If you can provide legitimate complaints that don't regard the design or change of Dante, I'll hear you out, but often I never hear any of those legitimate complaints. Feel free to discuss those if you'd like, but I presented my case about why DmC is better as a game.
You just don't get it. The most fervent detractors of the game here on gaf have played it more than you and many other people ever will. The combat system is just not as good as MGR's or the other DMC games.
Here you go:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=46303048&postcount=620
Dahbomb got so tired of explaining them that he ended up including some of them in a faq. And those are only a few examples. Would love to see you address some of those complaints but of course, you won't.
It's only $12.73 on Amazon. MGR still goes for around $30-35, though Best Buy recently had a deal for $20 if you were also buying the Legacy Collection.DMC HD Collection is only 20 bux at Wal Mart and I'm pretty sure you can pick up MGR for dirt cheap if you have a local mom and pop vidya shop.
The reason why this doesn't bother me is because when playing a DMC game, I view DMD as the real playthrough, the real test of my abilities, the real evaluation of the game's combat system. The first two difficulties are scrimmages before the big game.
You're right. But I'm not looking at it as a fan of DmC or Platinum Games, I'm looking it as someone who played both and thought one was better.You just don't get it. The most fervent detractors of the game here on gaf have played it more than you and many other people ever will. The combat system is just not as good as MGR's or the other DMC games.
You think I don't know that? I've seen people on forums AND in real life dismiss the game because of the premise of the game. It's canon to the MG series, but apparently the "new raiden" doesn't jive with some people. I'm just saying it's stupid that those people do that.This is blatant bullshit and your posts are blind flame bait.
Raiden is taken as is from MGS 4.
Here you go:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=46303048&postcount=620
Dahbomb got so tired of explaining that he was good enough to include them in a faq.
As I mentioned in an earlier post I've played both the older Dmc games and bayoneta which are fantastic. I'm definitely leaning towards MGR at the moment though.
When I'm home from work later going to read through this thread again before making my decision.
Sadly I can't afford both.
Watch him ignore this postHere you go:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=46303048&postcount=620
Dahbomb got so tired of explaining them that he ended up including some of them in a faq. And those are only a few examples. Would love to see you address some of those complaints but of course, you won't.
If you like good combat and honing your skills with multiple plays, Revengeance.As I mentioned in an earlier post I've played both the older Dmc games and bayoneta which are fantastic. I'm definitely leaning towards MGR at the moment though.
When I'm home from work later going to read through this thread again before making my decision.
Sadly I can't afford both.
Only in being a cyborg ninja. In terms of characterization, he's far different from the emo, "woe is me" Gray Fox carbon copy that he was in MGS4. Building upon what was alluded to in MGS2, he went from turning his back on his past to embracing it to become far stronger in MGR.This is blatant bullshit and your posts are blind flame bait.
Raiden is taken as is from MGS 4.
I'd rank MGR slightly above Bayonetta, since the former is better structured for score-attack play (something very important to me). Outside of that, Bayonetta looks and feels more polished overall. It's a real shame Platinum wasn't given more time to give MGR the same level of polish.
If you like good combat and honing your skills with multiple plays, Revengeance.
If you want an average but disposable after one playthrough easy game, DmC.
If you like good combat and honing your skills with multiple plays, Revengeance.
If you want a jack-of-all trades but master of none, disposable after one playthrough easy game, DmC.