"Michael Bay talks to me on the phone. I've never met him. We were doing the voice for the second one and I still hadn't seen the first one. I still didn't really know who the chracters were and I didn't know what anything was. It's a voice job, for sure, and people assume I've spent my life working on it, but I really know so little about it."
This was snippit from 2010 interview and even before and after that he expressed same feelings towards his role. So why this is only now bothering people?
Is Michael Bay running for president? Because that's what that reads like to me.
ya. Did you just call every piece of music ever written and performed a masterpiece?
Is Michael Bay running for president? Because that's what that reads like to me.
What disgust? He just said he wasn't especially invested in the movies. He even went to great lengths to qualify the statement by saying that he wasn't coming down on anyone or the movie itself, just that the situation was atypical for him.Weaving's argument kinda falls apart after he's done 3 of these things in a row. If he was so disgusted by himself, he could have stopped first.
Or are they just reusing his lines from the first movie? I wouldn't put it past Bay.
I'm talking about this.He said he'll fulfill his contract if he's asked to, so what the fuck are you talking about?
And its not something I would want to do again. Im glad I did it. I did sign up for a number of pictures and I suppose, contractually, I would be obliged to, if they forced me to, but they wouldnt want to force someone to do it, if they didnt want to. I think Ive done my dash with that sort of film.
Oh boy. First: Fans of Transformers don´t share a collective thought like " the transformers have been awesome". Far from it, as a matter of fact many of them, including many gaffers, dislike them. Are they disrespectful? How do you measure disrespectful? Is " I was not attached to the project" a way of being disrespetful? Are you respectful to fans when you hide the fact that you haven´t been really attached? Or are just these fans disrespectful, whoever they are, because a single actor shares his thought on his work?
Who would want to be typecast into a nerd movie villain role?He doesn't want to do any more Marvel films and figures that if he doesn't want to do them they won't force him to.
Yeah, people keep saying Bay makes sense. It's mind blowing.There's something about this thread that is fucking with people's reading comprehension.
If by empowering you mean ravaging its corpse like a starved vulture, I totally agree as a Transformers fan that the Michael Bay Transformers films have definitely empowered the franchise.
I'm just waiting for the interviews where weaving starts hating on his work as Smith and Elrond. Dude seems to be in a negative flow lately.
Even if you hate the movies, you'd be blind to ignore that the movies have ushered in a resurgence in popularity for them, got the toys to be popular again, enabled awesome games like War for Cybertron to be greenlit, and helped Transformers Prime see the light of day.If by empowering you mean ravaging its corpse like a starved vulture, I totally agree as a Transformers fan that the Michael Bay Transformers films have definitely empowered the franchise.
I'm just waiting for the interviews where weaving starts hating on his work as Smith and Elrond. Dude seems to be in a negative flow lately.
Unfounded hearsay. It could have, or it couldn't have.All of which could have been achieved without such a shit catalyst. I'm not going to thank him for making tripe. Not even if his tripe resulted in the election of Optimus Prime as President.
He also reprised Megatron twice...Well Hugo is reprising his role as Elrond so for now it seems the role wasn't beneath him as an actor. Give it a few years after the Hobbit trilogy was out and maybe he'll say something. Doubt he'd ever say anything about his work as Agent Smith in the Matrix movies but it'd be interesting to see what he would have to say.
It's absurd to think that there's no one else in all of Hollywood who could have remade Transformers and brought attention back to it.
Why would I do that? For the most part I ignore their existence. But to say that people have to somehow agree that Bay empowered Transformers by making shitty racist, sexist, and overall insulting crap is asking too much.
What disgust? He just said he wasn't especially invested in the movies. He even went to great lengths to qualify the statement by saying that he wasn't coming down on anyone or the movie itself, just that the situation was atypical for him.
You make it out like he was saying, "Oooohhh.... Those sack of shit movies. Yeah, they were pretty dumbass. I totally phoned it in and felt like a cheap whore for even talking to Bay on Skype."
Where did anyone say that nobody other than Bay couldn't have achieved it? (Btw nice stealth edit on that part.) It's indisputable fact that Michael Bay's involvement with the Transformers movies brought the movies back into cultural significance since the 80's. Prior to the movies Transformers had some moderate success but ultimately a niche audience throughout Beast Wars, Beast Machines and the Unicron Trilogy. Despite the quality of the movies themselves they have made Transformers more popular than before. I don't understand why you can't look past your own opinion on how he made the movies and see how much it has benefited the Transformers brand and as a direct result, the fans.
Stealth edit? I added the first paragraph in about 3 seconds after I made the post because I forgot to say it. Not really sure what you're accusing me of there.
Again, I'm under no obligation to thank him for it, nor does my fandom of Transformers mean that I think that they have to keep making new stuff in it, let alone that Michael Bay should be lauded for it when what he puts out isn't so much bad as just plain offensive.
And I'm just expressing my opinion, you're the one who keeps telling me what I owe Michael Bay. Whatever positive side effects may have come about from his films doesn't change that I think he's a leach on it.
[and yes, I edited this post seconds after I posted it too. I promise it was only to expand on thoughts and not to try to trap you or something ridiculous like that.]
Nothing Weaving said comes off particularly aggressive or mean spirited. Weird response.
Maybe he realized he misinterpreted the intent there (seemingly Hugo Weaving regretting how he handled the role more than anything else) or at least realized that was way more likely to cause a shitstorm that Weaving's comments alone.It's worth noting (and perhaps worth updating the OP) that after Bay's comment was made on his official website that it was taken down shortly.
Weaving isn't complaining about the job. he's just saying that he had no attachment to it. The same way you have no attachment to being a burgerflipper.
Um, in this economy? Yea guy....
Maybe he realized he misinterpreted the intent there (seemingly Hugo Weaving regretting how he handled the role more than anything else) or at least realized that was way more likely to cause a shitstorm that Weaving's comments alone.
... I honestly can not understand siding with Michael Bay here. Maybe if we were talking about someone being completely venomous about their role, but it seems the only thing Hugo Weaving's guilty of is being extremely frank, not even condemning anyone involved. The worst I can think of is that it may've ended up inadvertently pulling back the curtains on how much those involved with REALLY cared about making the movies.
Unless Weaving voiced all three movies at once in one two hour session...why did he go back two more times if he felt the work wasn't worthwhile? Did the material get better or was that cash too good to pass up?
But I thought if he didnt want to do something they wouldnt be able to force him.Contracts.