I was hoping someone would answer your question. bro i don't understand any of this tbh. i'm just following the threadInteresting - How?
so - a little confused - CMA is essentially dropping their block? and they're going to work out remaining details? or they're adjourning until the evidence is presented and CAT makes a final ruling?Judge granted adjournment conditional on "evidence" provided. Not entirely clear on what evidence he needs, but he granted the adjournment regardless.
Does that mean they can close or they can not close? he talks too much I stopped focusing what does adjournment mean in this case.
I imagine he'll give his wife a good seeing to tonight.The judge keeps saying he requires satisfaction.
Someone give the man satisfaction.
Think of the money they are getting paid though. I'd happily sit there for hours if I was getting paid stupid money.I think Id rather work in Mcdonalds than have to be in this court all day and listen to this days a week for hours on end
Just a few days ago activision stock bottomed at $89. Today it’s jumped to $93. When it closes firm you can either wait for the full $95 or dump it when It hits somewhere around maybe $94.70.
You could had made 5-6% in 3 days.
He is old man. Talking is too much for him."I said at the top that I cannot say no and now I can say that my answer is yes"
WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON, THIS IS SO CONFUSING
so - a little confused - CMA is essentially dropping their block? and they're going to work out remaining details? or they're adjourning until the evidence is presented and CAT makes a final ruling?
Just a few days ago activision stock bottomed at $89. Today it’s jumped to $93. When it closes firm you can either wait for the full $95 or dump it when It hits somewhere around maybe $94.70.
You could had made 5-6% in 3 days.
It was weird the whole trust me bro argument and the Judge said ok but I need said proof eventually.I'm confused about all that as well. I think what is going to happen is CMA isn't blocking anymore as they seem to have the framework of a deal in place (although they contradicted that several times). The adjournment is granted so MS and ABK can close......I guess.
Seems like a lot of this based on trust that everyone will do what they say they are going to do. Kind of weird.
No but yes but conditional
I just hope Microsoft don't get involved in take-two,Capcom,Ubisoft etc and just let them run themselves
No. We have no idea what is going behind there.So it just depends on how long it takes for CMA/Microsoft to discuss and finalize the proposed remedy, which appears to be a divestiture of xCloud in the UK? The CMA said at the start of the trial that they have not received Microsoft's final remedy just yet, maybe Microsoft is still working out who xCloud will be divested to.
Is this what it seems like now?
Doesn't the deal need to be done by tomorrow or can they agree to extend it?
I assume it goes back to the cloud no? That was the main sticking point in the UK wasn't it?No. We have no idea what is going behind there.
CMA and MS dont want to spill it out.
But they still need until 29th August to review the none existent resubmission - so is it being extended? Surely the CMA can’t consent to closure without a proper submission?I'm confused about all that as well. I think what is going to happen is CMA isn't blocking anymore as they seem to have the framework of a deal in place (although they contradicted that several times). The adjournment is granted so MS and ABK can close......I guess.
Seems like a lot of this based on trust that everyone will do what they say they are going to do. Kind of weird.
IRRC, current CMA final report about current deal still stands and cannot be overturned until the new final report about the new deal. CAT appeal is also paused until the end of July, not cancelled.I'm confused about all that as well. I think what is going to happen is CMA isn't blocking anymore as they seem to have the framework of a deal in place (although they contradicted that several times). The adjournment is granted so MS and ABK can close......I guess.
Seems like a lot of this based on trust that everyone will do what they say they are going to do. Kind of weird.
He is going to get huge backlash from his investors.I don't see any reason why they can't extend. The deal is on the verge of completion with all road blocks out, Bobby 'backing out' after all this legal kerfuffle wouldn't make sense, why settle for $3 bn when he is securing $68 bn.
I don't see any reason why they can't extend. The deal is on the verge of completion with all road blocks out, Bobby 'backing out' after all this legal kerfuffle wouldn't make sense, why settle for $3 bn when he is securing $68 bn.
If they care about that, they would have agreed with the judge.But they still need until 29th August to review the none existent resubmission - so is it being extended? Surely the CMA can’t consent to closure without a proper submission?
What are you guys trying to accomplish here? You understand what Marcus Smith was saying so why play dumb? He was right. Is this supposed to be some gotcha dev "we caught you in a lie" blog post?
because he loses his job….
Microsoft won
It's cloud issue.I assume it goes back to the cloud no? That was the main sticking point in the UK wasn't it?
But they still need until 29th August to review the none existent resubmission - so is it being extended? Surely the CMA can’t consent to closure without a proper submission?
IRRC, current CMA final report about current deal still stands and cannot be overturned until the new final report about the new deal. CAT appeal is also paused until the end of July, not cancelled.
But maybe I'm stupid.
Man.....I got so confused during this thing with this Marcus Smith judge. I got a reply from mckmas8808 in the Ratchet and Clank SSD thread about Insomniac's Marcus Smith.....
I was like "what the fuck you talking about man?"
I’m going to invest in some ABK stock then.I really don't know, but I get the sense the rest of this is just a formality.