• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer will retire within next 12 months

Well in that case the less innovation the better. Companies do not want to have to rebuild their IT every three years. More stability and better security is all they're really after, I'm sure many would be happy to use Win7 forever.

Innovation only works when it doesn't get in your way.
 
Desktop is (slowly) dying, minor improvements to a decades-old paradigm isn't going to change that.

Tell that to the work force who don't go about facebooking every other second, or the gamer who builds his own rig. I'd love to see a poll on who is volunteering to build a rig "Optimized for Windows 8"

Darte gets it. The desktop might be losing foothold in the home, but gamers are always going to have one, or maybe a high end laptop. But there is no way in hell the desktop is leaving the business world anytime soon. Workstations are going to be needed for a very long time.

Edit: I hope this is good news. From a business perspective, Win 8 sucks a big hairy wang. As bad as a tablet based OS is for a workstation, its 100 times worse on a fkn server. Its cool if they want to experiment with stuff on the consumer end, but you don't bend over your business/professional customers. The whole windows 8 and Metro theme thing are just painful to use.
 
J Allard as CEO would be fucking incredible. He'd steer that ship right in a heartbeat, no question.

This. J Allard knows what's what. The XBOX and 360, love it or hate it, started a small revolution and it was thanks to Allard.

I could only imagine a Allard XBone.
 
All I have to say is WOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

Hopefully they'll bring in someone with some sense and who actually knows what they're doing.
 
I had forgotten how much gaming-side GAF overrates J Allard. I seem to remember a thread on here at one point comparing him to Steve Jobs, lol.
 
Ahhhh, finally!! Not only does GAF hate Ballmer, apparently so does the shareholders. Share price shot up on the news of his retirement!
 
Pretty major news actually. MS needs a visionary to lead the company right now. There are so many failures in recent memory a major change needs to take place.
Zune Failed
Surface Failed
XBone is failing
Windows 8 Failed

They got the 360 and Windows 7 right but even before that was Vista.
 
Good.

Ballmer sucked because MS was late to everything even though they had mountains of resources and a lot of talent. They weren't innovating and by the time they finally caught up the leader had planted deep roots. Windows Phone, Bing, Surface, etc. are really great products (I even like Windows 8, 8.1 looks even better), but they came only after the Apple, Samsung, Google, and others established those respective markets and cemented themselves as leaders. They need to get better at entering emerging markets earlier and iterating faster to continue adding value. The old approach of release only major product updates every 2-3 years was on its deathbed long, long ago and MS took too long to adjust, letting competitors make better products faster.

Why is everyone so happy? A new CEO might just look at the moneysink called Xbox division and drop it.

Which would conflict heavily with the objective for a devices and services company, because Xbox delivers both in a growing games market (generation over generation). He's not going to hire someone that's going to exit that market, not when Live makes a billion a year and games are moving towards a service model (in 10 years they'll be delivered by the cloud and Xbox will be an app on any device). If anything, they'll spin off Xbox into its own company.
 
Innovation only works when it doesn't get in your way.

Erm, aside from the fact that this vague and sort of PR-speaky and obviously nonsense in a large number of cases, what kind of innovation do you have in mind? FWIW I do think that Metro and desktop stuff should be kept separate, I'm just not entirely sure what kinds of 'innovation' MS could bring to Windows. Unless you're talking about stuff like the task bar changes in Win7, in which case, I guess I agree? I just wouldn't really call that innovation, more like (much-needed) refinement.
 
Erm, aside from the fact that this vague and sort of PR-speaky and obviously nonsense in a large number of cases, what kind of innovation do you have in mind? FWIW I do think that Metro and desktop stuff should be kept separate, I'm just not entirely sure what kinds of 'innovation' MS could bring to Windows. Unless you're talking about stuff like the task bar changes in Win7, in which case, I guess I agree? I just wouldn't really call that innovation, more like (much-needed) refinement.

The backend of Windows 8 is what I call innovation. Near Solid State like speeds on a traditional HDD is short of nothing but amazing in my books. As far as I can see, the back end of Windows was *vastly* improved over Windows 7. There is stuff that works and stuff that does not blend well.

I can get twitter on my toaster, but why the hell would I want it?
 
This is a big deal for MS. Unfortunately, what if they put someone worse up there?

They need to get whoever is turning around the Xbox division right now, or whoever is responsible for 8.1.

Nobody is really turning the Xbox division around, since it's not like they've come up with anything new lately. Doing the opposite isn't the same as a new idea, it's just doing the opposite.
 
3vz53Tl.gif
 
The backend of Windows 8 is what I call innovation. Near Solid State like speeds on a traditional HDD is short of nothing but amazing in my books. As far as I can see, the back end of Windows was *vastly* improved over Windows 7. There is stuff that works and stuff that does not blend well.

I can get twitter on my toaster, but why the hell would I want it?

Well I agree that MS should do those things, and they are, but they're only ever going to be managing a declining market in that regard.
 
Didn't he lead the charge on Windows 8?

Yeah, but win 8 is a great OS barring one design flaw.

I've been using it for ages now, and with classic shell on to bring back the start menu, it's my favourite gui-based MS OS. Backend's great - the OS is super smooth and responsive.
 
Well I agree that MS should do those things, and they are, but they're only ever going to be managing a declining market in that regard.

Enterprise level customers would kill for this. Anything to make the work environment more efficient would have them lining up for ever. I don't have a number I can pull out, but I'm fairly sure they get a lot of money from Licensing Windows to businesses.

Creating a variant for customers would be a simple step if they cater to the business folks.
 
For OS software?!

For desktop OSes? Yes.

Enterprise level customers would kill for this. Anything to make the work environment more efficient would have them lining up for ever. I don't have a number I can pull out, but I'm fairly sure they get a lot of money from Licensing Windows to businesses.

Creating a variant for customers would be a simple step if they cater to the business folks.

I'm sure they make an enormous amount of money licensing to businesses. I think you're overlooking the extent to which many home users want an enterprise OS installed on their machine, though. Even including gamers; that market is tens of millions, MS are used to selling hundreds of millions of Windows licenses.
 
Yeah, but win 8 is a great OS barring one design flaw.

I've been using it for ages now, and with classic shell on to bring back the start menu, it's my favourite gui-based MS OS. Backend's great - the OS is super smooth and responsive.

I've been using it since April and I've grown to like it a lot. The software is good, but the transition was rough as hell. If he had given in on a few critical things in the beginning (i.e. responding to just enough consumer feedback) things could have turned out differently regarding consumer response.

For desktop OSes? Yes.

That's why Windows 8 was built at its core to serve multiple devices, desktop/laptop, tablet, and phone. They have their hands in all 3, but Apple and Google have taken over the tablet and phone OS markets. MS has to take a bigger part in making devices people want, but they have to start doing it earlier rather than just waiting until a market is mature and then try to take it over. It's part of why they're moving to a devices and services company. They recognize they need to own the whole package.
 
It's about time. That guy has been a lousy CEO. He has fundamentally misread the direction the world is taking. Hopefully the next person is more forward thinking.
 
For desktop OSes? Yes.



I'm sure they make an enormous amount of money licensing to businesses. I think you're overlooking the extent to which many home users want an enterprise OS installed on their machine, though. Even including gamers; that market is tens of millions, MS are used to selling hundreds of millions of Windows licenses.

For desktops yes. If the market switches to a complete touch monitor based solution, you could have some merit in that. AFAIK, touch monitors (and laptops that have touch based systems) have not exactly been a hot commodity since the inception of windows 8 based hardware.

What we're really seeing is an adjustment of the market where all the facebookers are buying a tablet to do their not-work things. The logic should be to come out with a competitive tablet that doesn't infringe upon the desktop setup, yet somehow they feel like forcing their existing user base out of an unfamiliar environment that they have grown accustomed to over 20 years of business.
 
This is GREAT news! It's going to take several years for MS to recover, and just in time for the next Xbox to come out BEASTING.
 
I believe it's time.

Time for the king to return to his throne.


220px-BillGates2012.jpg



He's gotta be almost out of money by now, right???
 
Probably chose.

I don't understand why GAF hates Ballmer.

Windows 8, Zune, Kin, Windows vista, Windows RT, Surface RT, xbox one fiasco, and totally complacent over the last decade. They were late to wvery single new market since 2001. They're the sears of the IT world.
 
I had forgotten how much gaming-side GAF overrates J Allard. I seem to remember a thread on here at one point comparing him to Steve Jobs, lol.

He's the best thing MS had going for them, no joke. I don't even drink the J Allard Kool-Aid, but compare X-box 180->360 launch era to X-box 360/post-J->720 launch.

Yeahhhh...

(And if that Win 9 rumor is true, plz2bdroppingMehtroandthewalledgardenstoreMSkthx)
 
I think he made the right call. It's been a decade since he took charge and by most accounts MS has struggled more than it should. Time for a new guy to inject a fresh perspective and take Microsoft to the next level.

edit: Most people think MS sucks because of their stumbles in the consumer side. Their enterprise business is a money-printing machine.
 
He's the best thing MS had going for them, no joke. I don't even drink the J Allard Kool-Aid, but compare X-box 180->360 launch era to X-box 360/post-J->720 launch.

Yeahhhh...

(And if that Win 9 rumor is true, plz2bdroppingMehtroandthewalledgardenstoreMSkthx)

Kin. Courier.
 
You can put me down as "cautiously optimistic". I'm pretty sure Ballmer was part of Microsoft's problem, but the question is how big of a part.
 
Top Bottom