• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Mind-blowing special effects and the ravages of time

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm still not decided on which space battle, Yavin or Endor, is the best in the series.

Battle of Endor for me. I loved all the co-ordination between the guys doing the tunnel run, the capital ships taking on the star destroyers and the destruction of the shield generator.
 
There are a number of shots in Zodiac that are clearly CGI and I can't believe people can't tell, even today. The one that really stood out even the first time I saw it was a shot of a car driving down a road with nothing but corn fields around. If you couldn't tell just by how everything looked, the camera shot was impossible to do in anything other than CGI.
 
Battle of Yavin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1KdFvZr0Lc (cannot find the original version without CGI... but it isn't that bad compared to the Jabaa scene...)

Old as it can get, still better than movies today.

I'm still not decided on which space battle, Yavin or Endor, is the best in the series.

Endor wins. Hands down. It is just mindblowing to think that they pulled off something of that scale using motion control cameras and models. The sheer volume of ships on screen and the motion of it all still impresses to this day, and is more impressive when you realize how it was pulled off.

Endor is still the high water mark for a big space battle for me.
 
There are a number of shots in Zodiac that are clearly CGI and I can't believe people can't tell, even today. The one that really stood out even the first time I saw it was a shot of a car driving down a road with nothing but corn fields around. If you couldn't tell just by how everything looked, the camera shot was impossible to do in anything other than CGI.

The long moving shot where the car drives up to the truck and someone walks towards it is particularly jarring. It's often passed around in impressive-making-of threads and stuff and it's like, really? What about this needed to be composite/CGI?
 
Why did the Agent jump after Trinity after she jumps through the window.

Why did Trinity jump through the window in the first place.

Not sure if serious. Or maybe you are overthinking it because the answers are really simple.

Trinity jumped hoping she would somehow escape. She did kind of the same thing in the first movie, although there she jumped in a building through a window instead of the opposite. Let's say this time she was more desperate lol.

The Agent jumped after her to make sure the job is done.
 
Not sure if serious. Or maybe you are overthinking it because the answers are really simple.

Trinity jumped hoping she would somehow escape. She did kind of the same thing in the first movie, although there she jumped in a building through a window instead of the opposite. Let's say this time she was more desperate lol.

The Agent jumped after her to make sure the job is done.

Well, It's been a while since I've seen the movie. But jumping out of a building seems like a terrible escape plan. Alright, maybe she was desperate. But the agent could just look out of window and watch her fall to her death. Why would you jump after her. On the other hand, he is an Agent, why not.

In the first movie she jumps through another building and not to the ground. Way better plan.
 
Oh man, Harry Potter is a goldmine:

dNEVPPz.jpg


DJvsDwX.jpg
I remember thinking this looked terrible when I saw it in the cinema. I was 10 years old.
It was never good.
 
Well, It's been a while since I've seen the movie. But jumping out of a building seems like a terrible escape plan. Alright, maybe she was desperate. But the agent could just look out of window and watch her fall to her death. Why would you jump after her. On the other hand, he is an Agent, why not.

In the first movie she jumps through another building and not to the ground. Way better plan.

The answer in both cases is really "why not"? Trinity couldn't possibly survive against two Agents, and the Agent couldn't care less about getting his host killed if it meant he could ensure Trinity's death.

In fact Trinity had a better chance to survive the fall than surviving from two Agents. In Final Flight of The Osiris Jue successfully bent the rules of the Matrix and survived her fall;

 
Love this thread.
 
What surprises me is how well War of the Worlds holds up. It's from 2005 and some effects can look a little dated but I also wouldn't be surprised to see a movie with the same quality of effects being released today.

Oh man, Harry Potter is a goldmine:

DJvsDwX.jpg
lol that fifa 98 grass
 
True Lies - James Cameron

The mix of miniatures and blended effects are still mind blowing and believable. Some shots are poorly done, but mostly the lightning does not match the backround.



1301868898t-true%20lies.jpg

5183688097_59abd84f51_z.jpg

True_Lies_G_09.jpg


blended:
jamie-lee-curtis-as-helen-tasker-in-true.jpg



miniatures:
True_Lies_G_05.jpg




no effects at all, mind blown
jamie-lee-curtis-751441.jpg
 
For me the beauty of practical effects is that they place limitations on the director that require some creativity and enhance the viewers imagination. For example, the monster may have to be mostly off screen, ships can't move blindingly fast or the camera can linger a bit since the model is done, no need to rush the shot. CGI lets directors get sloppy, they show too much, have crazy detail that overwhelms or resort to crap editing. Transformers is like this. Without CGI the robots wouldn't have those gears within gears motions and models would have more recognizable shapes. Think about Jaws versus some of the later shark films. Showing the entire shark doing silly stunts looks dumb (Deep Blue Sea and Jaws 3, I'm looking at you), the effect is better when you don't see it much, don't see it well, and the director has to deal with a real thing.
 
Part of the problem I have with modern CGI is how directors use that shit. Fuck man, does the camera have to do fucking somersaults through a scene? How about composition, framing and shit. And film today looks so fucking clean...even movies that are meant to look gritty look sterile...too crisp. Take some CG and make the movie look like it was filmed on some old film on an old camera with a great classic lens. That would be something.
 
Part of the problem I have with modern CGI is how directors use that shit. Fuck man, does the camera have to do fucking somersaults through a scene? How about composition, framing and shit. And film today looks so fucking clean...even movies that are meant to look gritty look sterile...too crisp. Take some CG and make the movie look like it was filmed on some old film on an old camera with a great classic lens. That would be something.

Word is that Abrams is actually trying to create a post-production filter that will make the stuff he's shooting for Episode VII look like it was shot on the same film stock as Star Wars back in 77
 
Legolas on the elephant was made fun of in LOTR at the time, right? I remember laughing my ass off as he climbed around Shadow of the Colossus style.
I think this movie mostly holds up well, including that scene, the only part that I remember looking cheesy is when he slides off the trunk after killing it. THAT looked fake even at the time
 
Part of the problem I have with modern CGI is how directors use that shit. Fuck man, does the camera have to do fucking somersaults through a scene? How about composition, framing and shit. And film today looks so fucking clean...even movies that are meant to look gritty look sterile...too crisp. Take some CG and make the movie look like it was filmed on some old film on an old camera with a great classic lens. That would be something.

Some actually try to do this. The issue is with a lot of films using digital cameras, there isn't any film grain to try and match.
 
Yah I guess, the blasters bolts are smoother and the image is better quality overall.

This is one of the only advantages the remakes had. Let's not talk of what they added on the blu ray version...
 

I remember going into that movie after reading an interview about how "most of the special effects would be practical" or whatever BS the producers had spun. I actually remember thinking that chase looked pretty okay at the time, but watching it now on Youtube, eurrrgh.
 
I remember going into that movie after reading an interview about how "most of the special effects would be practical" or whatever BS the producers had spun. I actually remember thinking that chase looked pretty okay at the time, but watching it now on Youtube, eurrrgh.

I actually tried to watch Crystal Skull for the first time not too long ago.
(Gave up after the scene where they fell down a dozen waterfalls)

It doesn't really count but the "50s-style" post-processing is absolutely awful.
There was also a shitty cgi rodent I believe. What the fuck were they thinking?
 
Most of the CGI in Crystal Skull looked bad in theaters. I saw it opening weekend and the monkey shit looked terrible and ultra fake then. Also, all of it looked heavily green screened to almost Star Wars prequel levels.
 
Crystal Skull sucked on every level not just visual effects. Probably the most disappointing movie i've ever watched. :(

It was even worse then the Star Wars prequels.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom