I think he was trying to counter the notion that the matter is unique to Minnesota or not under debate.
The funny thing is that among academics, there is no debate: desegregation is important...and the only question is how best to finance it given the growing social resistance to it. But this republican seems to want to not only withdraw all funding, but also allow for segregation to reign again.
because desegregation ruined everything.
I wonder if he thought nobody would actually read the article...but he was wrong.