The Bloody-Nine
Member
You do realise they could have included it and you personally are under no obligation to play it?Thanks Activision. Fuck multiplayer.
Last edited:
You do realise they could have included it and you personally are under no obligation to play it?Thanks Activision. Fuck multiplayer.
A game released in 2009 isn’t going to beat out this years CoD.And you clearly don't remember MW2 launch records
If true, wtf. Who the fuck asked for this? Why oh why would they remaster the campaign only.
I think this will be the case with most people who fondly remember it. I'm quite certain Activision believe there is solid logic behind doing this, but I have no idea what that might be.I was actually kind of excited for MW2 Remastered, but no multiplayer, no buy.
[/QUOTE]I can think of one fairly good possible reason. It would impact the player count in their current online title which has the ability to produce far more digital revenue than a remaster of an older title. This way they can still market and sell a remaster while maintaining the current titles player counts and spending. They have the data from COD4 to see what impact that had on their current title back then, and the introduction of DLC to a remastered online game. This would have played a part in the decision I think, though it could equally be something else entirely.
I'm sure you're right. However, if a remastered COD MP can destroy the current, perhaps they need to figure out why.
Back when Black Ops 1 was out, a community I was part of pushed for David Vonderhaar to add more game modes into Hardcore. He had us in private matches playing Dom in HC working out certain things. Way before my Gaf days, first time I ever interacted with anyone in the game industry. It was the last time I ever seen COD Devs listen to what a community wanted.
If they could make a COD that satisfied their base, they wouldn't have to worry about a remaster overtaking their current game. They wouldn't even need to remaster old games
it did? I don't remember it being that bad. Only really recall Halo 3 ODST receiving backlash after Microsoft bumped the price from $40 to $60(even almost halo fan I come across says the game was good regardless)Call of duty without multiplayer is just duty.
Dont do this activision, halo anniversary got a lot of backlash when 343 half-assed the mp by just making some maps for reach
Posted on Charlie intel twitter lol
It really speaks volumes about where the series is at when Activision knows they can't afford to re-release the series highlights anymore with their multiplayer component included. This should cement that realization and hopefully spark a serious debate internally about what has gone wrong with the series.
Link? I hope soFor those still interested, a guy who's been pretty reliable about this sort of thing says there's going to be a reveal today at 2PM EST. He says MP is in tact, and will come with all the original maps except 2.
Link? I hope so
I'll eat the salt. I hope it's true.Twitter user TRVVS. As I understand it, he's received temporary bans for COD leaks in the past. He's also promised to close his account if he's wrong.
As always, grain of salt and all that.
Will it just be a Campaign pack in with the next CODOnly question is... when?
Are we not getting a new COD this year? (this'll do nicely)
A game released in 2009 isn’t going to beat out this years CoD.
MW2 sold around 25 million copies. The remaster ain’t getting that.
Not.
Even.
Close.
Aside from GTAV no remaster of a big name title has ever come close to matching the sales of the original.
Will a MW2 remaster sell? Sure, but I’ll be shocked if it gets even 20% of the numbers of the original. If it got 20% Acti would be doing cartwheels.
As somebody who loves and defends remaster, they’re never big ticket hit items. They’re cheap, easy sources of revenue.