• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Monitoring the situation in Iran

He means white.
No I mean native.

Dont be such a clown.

Japanese people should run Japan, english (yes english are white) should run England, black Somalian should run Somalia.

Stop basing your emotions on american politics because the US is not the rest of the world. Unlike the UK, the US did have equal development from many nationalities.

You have a really small brain if you are seriously pulling the "white supremacist" card here
 
No I mean native.

Dont be such a clown.

Japanese people should run Japan, english (yes english are white) should run England, black Somalian should run Somalia.

Stop basing your emotions on american politics because the US is not the rest of the world. Unlike the UK, the US did have equal development from many nationalities.

You have a really small brain if you are seriously pulling the "white supremacist" card here
The conversation was regarding the UK. American politics? I'm, bri'sh m8
 
Put the native population first? Who qualifies as native and do they always get preferential treatment? What does this even mean?

Brits live there for thousands of years, there were few conquest so they are mixed with German, Italian, Nordic and french DNA. They are all native compared to XXI century Indian, Arab or African migrants.

No I mean native.

Dont be such a clown.

Japanese people should run Japan, english (yes english are white) should run England, black Somalian should run Somalia.

Stop basing your emotions on american politics because the US is not the rest of the world. Unlike the UK, the US did have equal development from many nationalities.

You have a really small brain if you are seriously pulling the "white supremacist" card here

Yeah, no one questions ethno states in Africa and Asia. But white countries have to be diverse.... why exactly?

White people are the true minority, 8% of the planet...
 
Last edited:
No I mean native.

Dont be such a clown.

Japanese people should run Japan, english (yes english are white) should run England, black Somalian should run Somalia.

Stop basing your emotions on american politics because the US is not the rest of the world. Unlike the UK, the US did have equal development from many nationalities.

You have a really small brain if you are seriously pulling the "white supremacist" card here
So you're for segregation and forced deporting? That's what it reads like.

And you validated Senua Senua 's point. Despite there being Indians, black and Asian folks who have been British for generations.
 
Yeah, no one questions ethno states in Africa and Asia. But white countries have to be diverse.... why exactly?

White people are the true minority, 8% of the planet...
Its a weird way that the west has viewed itself as like caregivers for the world.

Its the integration thats the problem, when I visit family in the UAE I visit and I live by their rules.

Its different to home but its how they run their country and I respect that... and all things considered, they have very little Petty crime so they must be doing something right for their people.
 
So you're for segregation and forced deporting? That's what it reads like.

And you validated Senua Senua 's point. Despite there being Indians, black and Asian folks who have been British for generations.
Do you hold black and indian countries to the same standards?

Pakistan mass deported many Afghanistan people recently? Was that wrong of them? Or do you respect them?
 
Brits live there for thousands of years, there were few conquest so they are mixed with German, Italian, Nordic and french DNA. They are all native compared to XXI century Indian, Arab or African migrants.



Yeah, no one questions ethno states in Africa and Asia. But white countries have to be diverse.... why exactly?

White people are the true minority, 8% of the planet...
The English also spread abroad in massive numbers in the last few centuries. They don't call themselves English anymore though. Some of them even call themselves American today.
I do actually wonder how many white people live outside Europe compared to non white people living inside Europe.
 
Do you hold black and indian countries to the same standards?

Pakistan mass deported many Afghanistan people recently? Was that wrong of them? Or do you respect them?

Unlike UK and Europe when no one assimilates, in UAE they have similar culture, values and they don't tolerate radical Islam (again, like Europe).

Western Europe brings people that hate them and tell population that "diversity is our strength". Total clown show...
 
Last edited:
Unlike UK and Europe when no one assimilates, in UAE they have similar culture, values and they don't tolerate radical Islam (again, like Europe).

Western Europe brings people that hate them and tell population that "diversity is our strength". Total clown show...
Thats how the world should be, like I hate north Korea as we all do. But if I go to north Korea it shouldnt be ok for me to not act the way the country expects of me considering they are inviting me in to stay with them

Obviously an extreme example though.
 
The English also spread abroad in massive numbers in the last few centuries. They don't call themselves English anymore though. Some of them even call themselves American today.
I do actually wonder how many white people live outside Europe compared to non white people living inside Europe.

There are big numbers in north America, south America and Australia but again... Total population of the world is ~8%. Modern medicine, agriculture and vaccines (developed mostly in Europe and USA) allowed populations of the third world to explode.
 
Last edited:
Do you hold black and indian countries to the same standards?

Pakistan mass deported many Afghanistan people recently? Was that wrong of them? Or do you respect them?

Most black and Asian countries are not a melting pot like Britain, Canada and the US. Shoot, even Brazil.

I think Pakistan has a ton of issues and problems and, imo, were wrong for forcefully deporting Afghans (I'm guessing it was mass deportation instead of deporting actual criminals).
 
So you're for segregation and forced deporting? That's what it reads like.

And you validated Senua Senua 's point. Despite there being Indians, black and Asian folks who have been British for generations.

Remigration is a necessity in Europe. At least some countries will embrace the concept in the coming decade, some are just a step away from it right now, even Sweden, which was the most "welcoming" (e.g. self-destructing) for a few years. Some, I fear, will succumb to a breakdown of their societies and Islam taking over the big cities.

No segregation, but forced deportations, for sure.
 
Remigration is a necessity in Europe. At least some countries will embrace the concept in the coming decade, some are just a step away from it right now, even Sweden, which was the most "welcoming" (e.g. self-destructing) for a few years. Some, I fear, will succumb to a breakdown of their societies and Islam taking over the big cities.

No segregation, but forced deportations, for sure.

Because Forced deportation is peaceful and clean in the US
 
Because Forced deportation is peaceful and clean in the US

It's not peaceful or clean, but it must be done if native populations want to keep their countries functional.

This problem wouldn't exist if stupid, short sighted politicians didn't allow this in the first place. Countries with secure borders don't have to think about this stuff now...
 
Last edited:
Vote

Base opinions on logic instead of emotions.

Take pride in your country and native population and put them first.

im 100% doing that, i just hope things do get better.

I'm just not racist, and I love that the UK is a melting pot of culture and has been before i was walking on this earth.
 
Last edited:
Without any judgement of which culture and value is good or not... It's almost a mathematical problem.

One hand you have a native population with a traditional culture with the lowest birthrate in their entire history and a small population. (Sweden eg. has a population compared to London, NY, etc. and a birthrate well bellow the replacement rate...)

On the other hand you have a massive immigrant population that keeps growing, with traditions and values that are completely different than the "natives", that lives segregated, does not integrate or assimilate the local traditions or values (because apparently this became a "crime" in the last 10 years) and a much higher birthrate...

No wonder what will happen in 20/30/50years.

It's not about the melting pot anymore. It's about replacement.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, no one questions ethno states in Africa and Asia. But white countries have to be diverse.... why exactly?
Do you really wonder why there are a lot of Indian immigrants in the UK, South American immigrants in Spain or Northern Africa immigrants in France ?

Hint: colonies

And if you wonder why there are a lot of Turkish immigrants in Germany, that's because Germany litteraly sent buses to Turkey in the 70s to bring workers in Germany.
 
Do you really wonder why there are a lot of Indian immigrants in the UK, South American immigrants in Spain or Northern Africa immigrants in France ?

Hint: colonies

And if you wonder why there are a lot of Turkish immigrants in Germany, that's because Germany litteraly sent buses to Turkey in the 70s to bring workers in Germany.

Current crisis go beyond colonies and workers from XX century.

Migration waves that happened since 2015 have nothing to do with them, and now countries that didn't have colonies have big ass Muslim populations.

I think someone said (Konstantin?) that UK in the last few decades had more migration than in the entire 1000 years before that (and that includes conquest).
 
Native population is meaningless for a lot of countries. How far do we go back and why? Does the UK use the Viking northern genetics, the Anglos Saxon south or Roman? If it's more recent, why and what does native mean if that's the case apart from white? Loads of countries have complex histories with loads of mixed heritage which is continuing now and personally I love the UK for being multiculural.
 
Last edited:
Native population is meaningless for a lot of countries. How far do we go back and why? Does the UK use the Viking northern genetics, the Anglos Saxon south or Roman? If it's more recent, why and what does native mean if that's the case apart from white? Loads of countries have complex histories with loads of mixed heritage which is continuing now.

Last big shift in UK population was hundreds of years before USA became a country. People living there for generations are native as fuck...

I think in 2026 it even could be based on how well people are assimilated.

Are you creating ghettos and not speaking English? GTFO!

Well behaving migrants would be spared that way.
 
Nothing will change until one country gets forced into sharia law by democratic elections, then the rest will panic and try to do something about it but it will be too late for most of them.
 
Last big shift in UK population was hundreds of years before USA became a country. People living there for generations are native as fuck...

I think in 2026 it even could be based on how well people are assimilated.

Are you creating ghettos and not speaking English? GTFO!

Well behaving migrants would be spared that way.
The language and cultural integration (the latter is more difficult to gauge I guess) is already supposed to happen when attempting to become a national, so it sounds like enforcing that better would work for you.
 
The language and cultural integration (the latter is more difficult to gauge I guess) is already supposed to happen when attempting to become a national, so it sounds like enforcing that better would work for you.

Try convincing people that hate your guts to integrate and adapt to your values.

They are here because someone told them they will get free money, housing and easy access to white females. They despise non Muslims, especially current left wing weaklings. They have zero respect for modern day Christians that act like doormats.

1600 years of military fight between Christians and Muslims and then modern left dismantled and disarmed societies in 60 years... people are welcoming their own doom with open arms.
 
Native population is meaningless for a lot of countries. How far do we go back and why? Does the UK use the Viking northern genetics, the Anglos Saxon south or Roman? If it's more recent, why and what does native mean if that's the case apart from white? Loads of countries have complex histories with loads of mixed heritage which is continuing now and personally I love the UK for being multiculural.
Lmao you know nothing of the UKs history talking about how far do we go back..

English people being genetically angle Saxon's is a myth

50 to 70% of English peoples DNA is native Briton. The angles etc replaced the political class but it was hardly an invasion or mass migration. Of course their DNA is in English, just not like the myth suggests.

The vikings mixed a little bit got kicked out.

Despite the insane left wing propaganda England is not a land of immigrants. And the English through a mix, did form a unique English identity that then created a nation state.

England was never l multicultural or diverse. Tony Blair opened the flood gates and then declared we were a multicultural nation out of nowhere. Foreign nationals represented 3% of the population in 1997. Now it's 17% pure insanity
 
Top Bottom