Water battles are vicious. I like them conceptually, but you need to be able to move a bit faster than you do.I played Tri tonight and for the first time in a few weeks I had to do some heavy duty underwater combat.
Unlike my land skills, which I remembered almost instantly like riding a bike, I struggled the whole way through when in the water and failed the quest. T_T
I like the idea of water battling... just not the details.
Sharpness +1 will still boost how much high quality sharpness you have on weapons, so it's not worthless.Looking at some of the weapons in Tri G here and it looks like the endgame weaponry (G rank?) have natural purple sharpness. So I guess Sharpness+1 is worthless instead of necessary when you get that far into the game?
Sharpness+1 only takes 10 armor skill points (instead of 15) to activate now? I was going to say that Razor Sharp would make more sense to extend the length of purple sharpness but this changes everything.Sharpness +1 will still boost how much high quality sharpness you have on weapons, so it's not worthless.
Yes, there are a few weapons which even with Sharpness +1, the sharpness will remain the same (hence Rare 10).Looking at some of the weapons in Tri G here and it looks like the endgame weaponry (G rank?) have natural purple sharpness. So I guess Sharpness+1 is worthless instead of necessary when you get that far into the game?
Also, :lol at the Dual Sword that looks like a fork + knife.
Water battles are vicious. I like them conceptually, but you need to be able to move a bit faster than you do.
Rule 1 of MonHun: don't listen to DCharlie.
agreed - if you want to avoid learning something about the series and are content in wallowing in ignorance , i'd avoid everything i say!
I have some questions about the multiplayer. I've checked the OP but found nothing.
Let's say that I have the Wii U vesion of the game.
I can play online with other 3 friends, as in Tri for Wii. But, can I play also locally with friends? Tri had the Arena mode, but I'd like to know if it will be enabled also the coop for the "campaing", this time.
Locally via Wii U-3DS / 3DS-3DS. Arena mode is present but split screen is unknown at this point of time
If yes: will they use the "second screen" local multy (as CoD for example), where P1 plays on the Gamepad and P2 on the TV? or will it be split-screen?
Unknown at point of time
Will it be possible to use the 3DS as an additional pad to play the game in local multiplayer? If yes, have I to own als the 3DS version of the game?
Yes you will have to own the 3DS version of the game to play locally
If I have also a 3DS in the same room of my Wii U running an online hunt, can I play online with the 3DS?
No, local wireless only as online mode is not present in the 3DS version
I know that I can share the saves between 3DS copy and Wii U copy, but what does the cross-play means? Something I mentioned above?
Cross-play means you are able to play at home and transfer your save to the 3DS to play the game outside.
Thank you
IF, the game remains the same as the JP 3DS version, which is highly likely, then these will be the answers:
Didn't get through the whole thread, but any word on Lobby size? MH3 on Wii was clearly built for large online cities/lobbies, but was restricted for some reason (wii speak, I think it was?)
Really hoping this one ups the count.
I don't care much about MH, but this pic got me interested.I'm just browsing for MH3U stuff - this monster size comparison is cool http://images.wikia.com/monsterhunter/images/c/cd/MH3G_Size_Chart.jpg
Just read from HACHIMA that Nintendo is going to provide all the servers for MH3G HD ver.
So does Capcom no longer suck?
I never played a MH game before..only the Tri demo which I was so desperate to try, I actually bought a copy from eBay.
I liked what I played. The whole concept seemed very appealing, but I could see that time limit becoming bothersome.
In the end I didn't buy Tri because I just didn't have the time to dedicate towards a game of that scale. Xenoblade remains about 30% completed despite owning it since UK launch for the same reason.
Maybe this time.
Will 3ds version be fun with no online and no one local to play with?
As I said before, people enjoy Monster Hunter differently. I came from a background of generally preferring single player experiences and after playing two MH games mostly solo at 100+ hours I would say it's one of my favorite series of all time.
Will 3ds version be fun with no online and no one local to play with?
That's awesome, never seen that before.
It's included in TriG weird I know lol.t it was actually a promotional clip for the original Tri, not Tri G, so it only includes Tri's monsters. It's weird that it wasn't included on the original Tri's disc.
That's great! I would be new to the series and wasn't sure if some Dragons/Monsters were impossible to defeat solo.
The game is balanced depending on if you play solo or multiplayer; solo monsters have less health and do less damage to accommodate.
Still, if you're new, it may seem like some monsters are impossible to defeat... But it's a trial by fire, the best victory is one well earned with sweat and rage.
Will 3ds version be fun with no online and no one local to play with?
I played Tri tonight and for the first time in a few weeks I had to do some heavy duty underwater combat.
Unlike my land skills, which I remembered almost instantly like riding a bike, I struggled the whole way through when in the water and failed the quest. T_T
I like the idea of water battling... just not the details.
If you read this thread you'd realize that's not true for some players.
I wonder if the Wii U and 3DS version will be bundled together when it comes out in the west. I hope so as I am interested in getting both since you can transfer saves between both versions.
And it's true for a lot of players. What's your point? We're giving opinions here.
I'm not going to go ahead and tell him "Yes it's amazing omg so much fun!" if there's a chance he'll end up being bored soloing.
I cleared MHF2/MHFU completely solo and never did I feel like I was 'missing the point' of the game. For me playing Tri with randoms ranged from painful to annoying, and often I'd have had an easier time solo. Now hunting with a good group of friends is amazingly fun, but it's absolutely a different experience. I think going one on one with a giant monster has its own appeal.
All opinions of course, but you might want to rethink implying that solo is somehow irrelevant when a lot of MH players (especially on PSP in NA) are huge fans of the series and have never touched the multiplayer.
It's great that people can enjoy the game in single player only but nothing - just, nothing - compares to going on 4P hunts with people who know what they're doing.
Nothing.
(...Nothing.)
EDIT: That said, Ultimate is way better about providing a meaty single-player experience than Tri was. High-rank village quests make it possible to actually get some decent gear and fight some cool monsters offline. But then again, the only way to do G-rank is to go online (well, multiplayer) and that is where the real meat and challenge of the game come into play.
Ahh man I can't wait to play this online and in HD.
It's great that people can enjoy the game in single player only but nothing - just, nothing - compares to going on 4P hunts with people who know what they're doing.
Nothing.
(...Nothing.)
EDIT: That said, Ultimate is way better about providing a meaty single-player experience than Tri was. High-rank village quests make it possible to actually get some decent gear and fight some cool monsters offline. But then again, the only way to do G-rank is to go online (well, multiplayer) and that is where the real meat and challenge of the game come into play.
Ahh man I can't wait to play this online and in HD.
Ahh man I can't wait to play this online and in HD.
Sven mentioned a "soft bundle" or something for Capcom's site. Presumably, both versions for $90 or so.