• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Monsters (Trailer / District 9, Cloverfield-esque)

Status
Not open for further replies.
harSon said:
I'd rather have the opposite to be honest. District 9 is probably one of the most overrated films of the decade, it ditched its interesting premise in favor of becoming a standard action film and was worse off because of it.

I would rather have any movie be less Cloverfiled. District 9 at least delivered and gave us alien mech vs sniper battles. Clovefield gave us trust-funders in love.

This movie looks like an aesthetic copy of D-9. That's not bad by any stretch but they better have some worthwhile plot to make it stand out.
 
Looks like this is hitting U.S. PSN this Friday, just got this in my inbox:

20100923-c47i1x9im5eycdgr5trgnpgx2r.jpg


It's also hitting HDNet Movies next month:

20100923-bq9aw5dd96rsgnc9q5rsy9kbjb.jpg
 
^ first time I've heard about those pre-theatre releases. Doesn't that make it insanely easy to pirate the movie?
 
Sorry to burst your hype guys, but I saw this movie at Toronto Film Festival, and it's boring.

It's a long movie too. By the end of it, I think the audiences clapped because it finally ended, not because it was great.
 
canova said:
Sorry to burst your hype guys, but I saw this movie at Toronto Film Festival, and it's boring.

It's a long movie too. By the end of it, I think the audiences clapped because it finally ended, not because it was great.
Hmmm that kinda sucks. I'm still looking forward to watching it tonight though.
 
The District 9-esque marketing is throwing people off. This basically a relationship movie with a minor sci-fi backdrop from what I've heard.
 
Expendable. said:
The District 9-esque marketing is throwing people off. This basically a relationship movie with a minor sci-fi backdrop from what I've heard.
So something like Shaun of the Dead-lite but with sci-fi undertones and no humor...I can roll with that.
 
I gotta say, I'm kinda upset that this movie is called "Monsters". These aren't monsters. It even says that on the poster itself. They are aliens. I want a movie called Monsters that's about actual earth-bound monsters like Cloverfield and Godzilla, not creatures from outer space.
 
WordAssassin said:
I gotta say, I'm kinda upset that this movie is called "Monsters". These aren't monsters. It even says that on the poster itself. They are aliens. I want a movie called Monsters that's about actual earth-bound monsters like Cloverfield and Godzilla, not creatures from outer space.
Cloverfield monster was an alien.
 
Tieno said:
Cloverfield monster was an alien.
Except it wasn't. I don't want to start this whole debate up again but Clovie was from earth. The thing that fell into the water at the end of the movie was a satellite, not an asteroid, and it's what woke her up. The creators have said so on record.
 
Don't really get the D9 vibe from it nor Cloverfield but it still seems cool and more monster movies is never a bad thing. I hope it's going to be good.
 
WordAssassin said:
Except it wasn't. I don't want to start this whole debate up again but Clovie was from earth. The thing that fell into the water at the end of the movie was a satellite, not an asteroid, and it's what woke her up. The creators have said so on record.
oops, didn't know that. Thanks!
 
It...wasn't bad.

I kind of expected a lot more action I suppose? Then again, the first trailers didn't really show much in the first place.

Whitney Able is pretty damn cute though.
 
Was watching a tv promo and saw that this was advertised on iTunes to rent. Figured I would check the thread and see if it was hitting anything else. I will check this out from PSN Friday.
 
got in on VOD.

I really liked it. If you go in knowing this is a low-budget film about two people coming together, it is very satisfying. The "monster" bits are very well-done and it Edwards gives a great foreboding sense throughout the whole thing. Nice, little movie. He has a great future.
 
gdt5016 said:
Is this on Live?
Yes, but it seems to cost $15 for HD and $10 for SD rental. Not sure how high the prices usually are but that's too high for me. *waits for PSN to finish updating*

EDIT: $10 in SD and $13 in HD on PSN. At least it's a little better.. =P
 
iamaustrian said:
ugh, CGI can suck a dick

will we ever get handmade stop-motion back?
:lol

I think you need to go watch some stop motion again. It's charming and effective in certain films, but the best CGI will always trump the best stop motion. It's only when CGI is abused that it looks horrible...but the same goes for bad stop motion.
 
Expendable. said:
I'm doing a 1:1 interview with the director Gareth Edwards on Saturday. Would be happy to ask any questions you guys have!

Ask him if he's thought about the larger mythology of the universe.
 
Just watched this, and was thoroughly entertained. I agree with what Expendables said about expectations and know what the film is about beforehand. And that final scene was pretty intense.

Were those 2 aliens at the very end playing with each other?
:lol
 
If this movie shows a glimmer of the lifeform in the last 20 mins; fuck it, its dead to me. This is like when they decided the new X-Files movie wouldn't be about aliens, which is what most people know and love the show for.

This is like an episode of Smallville where Clark is still fighting his destiny 10 years into the show. Fuuuck you
 
Meus Renaissance said:
If this movie shows a glimmer of the lifeform in the last 20 mins; fuck it, its dead to me. This is like when they decided the new X-Files movie wouldn't be about aliens, which is what most people know and love the show for.

This is like an episode of Smallville where Clark is still fighting his destiny 10 years into the show. Fuuuck you

I dont understand wtf you are saying.
 
Expendable. said:
I'm doing a 1:1 interview with the director Gareth Edwards on Saturday. Would be happy to ask any questions you guys have!

Damn I missed out, I would have asked for Miss Abel's number :D
 
Just saw this movie and....ehhhhh...... :( I was really disappointed. Not an action movie, not a sci-fi action movie, not a thriller, not a sci-fi thriller. It's like a...I don't know. It's a drama with very little dialogue and not very much sci-fi. Most of the cool shots are in the trailer(s) and when you get a decent look at the aliens, it's lackluster and weird. But the lack of seeing the aliens isn't a problem...I will expand below!

(Possible spoilers? I don't reveal anything you wouldn't know if you've seen the trailer, but steer clear if you don't want to know any slightly expanded details:)

However it's pretty clear, once you start watching it, the "sci-fi/alien" part of the movie is very, very minor. I don't know if it's intended this way, but that's how it comes across. It's much more a movie about the relationship between the two characters and, oh yeah, there's some aliens.

Again, not a lot of dialogue and it seems like the movie couldn't figure out what angle it wanted to go with. The beginning starts off with text on the screen explaining aliens are in Mexico or whatever, quarantined zone, etc. But doesn't really deal with aliens hardly at all. You see them directly involved in a scene twice. Was really just kind of a boring hour and a half. The movie does have some beautiful direction, though, and a few scenes are just absolutely gorgeous.

Any comparison to Cloverfield or District 9 is not related to anything about the movie other than the fact that there are aliens in it at some point.
 
I liked it.

I thought it was a very original take on the alien genre, and I liked the "realness" of it all. Like, if that situation really happened, with the aliens and all, I have no problem believing the two governments and the civilians would act the way they do. The love story didn't bother me, and the backdrop of the story was awesome. For every "action-hero" story with aliens in them, its good to finally have the "ordinary citizen that doesn't see much" side of it.

The photograph that always wants something awesome to happen so he could photograph it is kind of a metaphor for the people that whine that there wasn't enough action.
 
Zoramon089 said:
No, because it was tedious and looked like shit. Only nostalgia makes you think otherwise
Counter-argument: Moon was mostly filmed using miniature sets and models and barely any CGI. It wasn't stop motion, but it was physical models and it looks better than CGI.
 
Beaulieu said:
I liked it.

I thought it was a very original take on the alien genre, and I liked the "realness" of it all. Like, if that situation really happened, with the aliens and all, I have no problem believing the two governments and the civilians would act the way they do. The love story didn't bother me, and the backdrop of the story was awesome. For every "action-hero" story with aliens in them, its good to finally have the "ordinary citizen that doesn't see much" side of it.

The photograph that always wants something awesome to happen so he could photograph it is kind of a metaphor for the people that whine that there wasn't enough action.
I don't mind the love story either, and if purely viewed as such, it was quite good. However, the trailer leads you to believe otherwise and then you get a completely different movie that most audiences are going to be disappointed in, and the movie will bomb because of this. I have a feeling it's the studio trying to make it have action movie appeal by misleading people.
 
Horsebite said:
Counter-argument: Moon was mostly filmed using miniature sets and models and barely any CGI. It wasn't stop motion, but it was physical models and it looks better than CGI.
Your are comparing miniature effects to CGI? To do so is very silly.
 
Horsebite said:
Counter-argument: Moon was mostly filmed using miniature sets and models and barely any CGI. It wasn't stop motion, but it was physical models and it looks better than CGI.

Moon had heaps of CGI. Gerty was all CGI except for tight shots!
 
I enjoyed the movie. It is a really impressive looking film for the budget. Only one really bad CGI moment. It is derivative of several other Sci-Fi/ Giant monster flicks but is so unique in tone that it stands apart.

Nice interview by the way. It sounds like it was filmed very much in the way that I expected it had been done.
 
Posted this in the general movies thread previously.

This post is loaded with spoilers. Only continue when you already have seen the movie or when you're pretty sure you're not going to watch it anyway. I wasn't sober watching this movie and it might have influenced my perception.

First of, this movie is absolutely mistitled. Really, there aren't that many monsters on-screen. A more accurate title would've been 'travelling through areas sorta affected by aliens while talking about relationships and other stuff that matters' but yeah that's definitely less marketable.

The thing with this movie is, it's incorporating all these themes from real-life conflicts and issues without any subtlety. Corrupt war-torn country official (Iraq) asking way too much money for travelling? Check. Ineffective, PR-driven measures to combat a virus/outbreak (SARS)? Check. Border issues (Mexican immigrants)? Check. Giant wall proving ineffective (US-Mexican border again, or, if you will, West Bank Barrier)? Check. Vague pseudo-philosophic babbling about wether the end justifies the means (Iraq)? Check. But with aliens. Now this could've worked splendidly were it not for the fact that it's all just thrown into the mix without any depth or backing.

So, we watch the main protagonists encounter simple but noble, friendly locals, corrupt officials, dabble a bit in human trafficking, watch them getting ripped of during the process, get their envoy chopped up, re-enter the states (remarkably easing despite a friggin' HUGE wall on display), watch the aliens mate - after which the female lead promptly develops maternal instincts and finally gives in to the male lead who's been craving it for the better part of the movie but had been ACCESS DENIED' until said moment. During all this every now and then sparkling oversized octopi pop up to display an appetite in car batteries, gasoline and fighter jets. Oh, and they poop out electric mushrooms that stick to trees.

Highlights of the movie were the ongoing realization that, supposedly, the movie was made with less than a million. Yeah, the CG planes and choppers look shit. But the monsters weren't that bad and the world-building was decent with wrecks, ruins, notifications and gasmasks being the producer's favourite way of telling us the restricted zone is pretty FUBAR. Best part of dialogue in the movie: chick: doesn't it kinda bother you, that you need something bad to happen, to profit from it? Photographer dude: (pauses) you mean, like a doctor?

Monsters falls flat because of a weak script. With the limited budget they did a great job and the set designers deserve work for life for what they did. The leads aren't too bad either. But the hamfisted way in which the movie deals with modern-day themes combined with just a whole lot of nothing happening make it heavy in atmosphere but lightweight in story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom