• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

More pictures of the GI.Joe Cast

Status
Not open for further replies.
The helmet of that figure looks see through.

*edit: it is see through. You can make out his face in the character picture on the figure package.
 
Baroness.jpg


New shot of Sienna Miller. That costume kills me every time.

Also, new trailer to debut tomorrow at 4:30pm EST.
 
Tom_Cody said:
Baroness.jpg


New shot of Sienna Miller. That costume kills me every time.

Also, new trailer to debut tomorrow at 4:30pm EST.
Sienna Miller looks stupidly awesome. So much better than I thought she'd be.
 
these hollywood suits are really taking it too far..

this movie looks beyond hideous..

i thought transformers was pretty bad... this will be 100 times worse
 
I'm almost embarassed to say "that looked awesome" but I've learned to sort of adopt to shit like this and Transformers, so whatever, bring on the booms and utter ridiculousness :lol

Besides, it can't be as bad as Van Helsing. I'm convinced of this. But then again I kept thinking that Wolverine couldn't be as bad as X-Men 3.
 
that was one of the few times i've actually said to myself "that cgi was embarrassingly bad"

@ the end where the crysis dudes were dodging missles
 
I think im gonna like this movie. I maybe saw one episode of GI Joe when i was a kid, so i have really low expectations.

Summer blockbuster + lots of shit blowing up + crazy action scenes + good cfi effects... it will be OK.
 
Holy crap, the end where they were dodging missiles, the one guy's hand looks like it was clipping the other one's head - this was the obvious CGI scene I've probably ever seen, and I can't believe I saw something like that in a trailer in 2009, let alone for a huge name like G.I. Joe...

Why are they even tying the name to this movie when it looks nothing like it, and the characteristics and feel of this movie is nothing like the original series?

Even Dragonball Evolution seems closer to the source than this...
 
I love just how rubbish the CGI is...I mean at the very least you would expect the movie to have good SFX going for it, but no :lol

After Mummy Retruns and Van helsing, its pretty much become Stephen Sommers trademark
 
Skilotonn said:
Holy crap, the end where they were dodging missiles, the one guy's hand looks like it was clipping the other one's head - this was the obvious CGI scene I've probably ever seen, and I can't believe I saw something like that in a trailer in 2009, let alone for a huge name like G.I. Joe...

Why are they even tying the name to this movie when it looks nothing like it, and the characteristics and feel of this movie is nothing like the original series?

Even Dragonball Evolution seems closer to the source than this...
Wow...

Okay, so: I slow-moed the shot at the end - no clipping. It's obviously CG in the fact that the camera is moving in ways it shouldn't be able to move, and that the characters are moving in super-human ways (an ability afforded them by the "accelerator suits.") The quality of the CG, though, is pretty good and no-where near the title of "most obvious CGI scene ever" (I think that distinction goes to the fake Keanu Reeves in Matrix Reloaded - edit: or the Mummy movie, which I never saw :)).
 
I've never had an eye for "bad" CGI unless it's really obvious and I think the trailer looks great. I'm definitely watching this unless the reviews are really bad.

I also don't get why people are ragging on this so much. Everything we've seen looks fine or great actually. The ninjas look awesome, especially. Maybe it's because I'm too young to remember much of the GI Joe cartoons from back then so I don't really give a shit how close or far from the source material the movie is.


Schattenjagger said:
these hollywood suits are really taking it too far..

this movie looks beyond hideous..

i thought transformers was pretty bad... this will be 100 times worse[

Transformers is bad now?
 
Heh heh, picky GAF as usual


As a child I dreamed of this. I'm just happy they've tried to stay close to the source...

I mean, this is Hollywood, Storm Shadow could've been played by Owen Wilson and Snake Eyes could be speaking and wearing no mask at all... which happened in the original script.

I'm not expecting this to play out as envisioned in my childhood fantasies, but I don't expect it to be too bad either.
 
Igo said:
It was when I saw it. 2nd one looks worse too. To be fair, it's the acting that kills it for me.

:lol

You're complaining about the ACTING in a movie about giant CGI robots?

What were you expecting? An Oscar-worthy performance from Megan Fox and whoever it was that voiced Optimus Prime? Or was it because Optimus Prime's face was not expressive enough for you?

:lol :lol :lol
 
ElyrionX said:
:lol

You're complaining about the ACTING in a movie about giant CGI robots?

Well when 80% of the film has nothing to do with giant CGI robots, and revolves around a bunch of shitty humans and their shitty acting...
 
Snaku said:
Well when 80% of the film has nothing to do with giant CGI robots, and revolves around a bunch of shitty humans and their shitty acting...
Well even without your $9, it'll still make 300+ million.....

I'm sure you wont be missed.
 
the acting in this GI Joe trailer makes the acting in Transformers seem like the work of experienced thespians

not to mention that in the first place the acting isn't exactly Keanu Reeves bad or anything, lots of hyperbole imo in regards to it.
 
ElyrionX said:
Transformers is bad now?

  1. Overbudget game of hide and go seek at Sam's house
  2. Giger meets Terminator look of the Transformers
  3. Fights that are nothing more than multicolored bits of metal rolling around
  4. Bumble Bee pissing
  5. Jazz's generic ebonics
  6. Too many humans, not enough robots
  7. Transforming product placement

A few nip picks here and there as well. I don't care for Transformers, but it was a decent action movie.

But I do agree... I don't see why G.I. Joe is getting so much flack when no one's seen it yet. It has explosions, ninja, women, submarine battles, guns, snowmobiles with missiles, bikes with swords... all it needs is a Tyrannosaurs Rex with lasers and this would be GAF's dream movie.
 
Snaku said:
Well when 80% of the film has nothing to do with giant CGI robots, and revolves around a bunch of shitty humans and their shitty acting...

Popcorn flick. Ever heard of it?

If you're going to let shitty acting in a movie like Transformers affect your opinion of it, why even bother watching it in the first place?
 
Skilotonn said:
Holy crap, the end where they were dodging missiles, the one guy's hand looks like it was clipping the other one's head - this was the obvious CGI scene I've probably ever seen, and I can't believe I saw something like that in a trailer in 2009, let alone for a huge name like G.I. Joe...

Why are they even tying the name to this movie when it looks nothing like it, and the characteristics and feel of this movie is nothing like the original series?

Even Dragonball Evolution seems closer to the source than this...



if someone has it, please post that gif of from the TRansformers movie of IronHide + Jazz(?) dodging missiles on the crowded city streets....seems almost identical
 
ElyrionX said:
Popcorn flick. Ever heard of it?

If you're going to let shitty acting in a movie like Transformers affect your opinion of it, why even bother watching it in the first place?

So I'm an asshole for wanting more Transformers in my Transformers movie? Huh.
 
OokieSpookie said:
Um yes.

Being a huge summer blockbuster that will make 100's of millions of dollars holds more value than a british TV show.

He'll get more quality movie roles from GI Joe than he would without.

You're a fool if you think otherwise.
 
Outcast2004 said:
Um yes.

Being a huge summer blockbuster that will make 100's of millions of dollars holds more value than a british TV show.

He'll get more quality movie roles from GI Joe than he would without.

You're a fool if you think otherwise.
I doubt GI Joe will make anything above $120 mil total gross, if even that.

Awful trailers, awful special effects, August release date...
 
Snaku said:
So I'm an asshole for wanting more Transformers in my Transformers movie? Huh.

My mistake. I got you confused with the original poster I was responding to.

Anyway, I thought there certainly could have been more giant robot action in the first film but I didn't think the movie suffered that much from it.
 
Dead said:
I doubt GI Joe will make anything above $120 mil total gross, if even that.

Awful trailers, awful special effects, August release date...

Summer movie season, big time license, lots of action.

It's going to make a ton of money.

BTW, wasnt that the same argument people tried to use when they were convinced Transformers was going to bomb?
 
Dead said:
I doubt GI Joe will make anything above $120 mil total gross, if even that.

Awful trailers, awful special effects, August release date...


I really don't think most people will share your sentiment that the trailer and special effects are awful.
 
I don’t get why everyone is so shocked by this-It looks exactly like I expected a GI Joe movie to look.
It'll be an OTT cheesy summer blockbuster with wooden acting, CGI in every scene, hot women, ninjas, and shit blowing up every 10 seconds.
It's already been said but this is a move based on a line of action figures! WTF did you expect? :lol
It'll probably be as awful/awesome as Transformers was.
 
Outcast2004 said:
Summer movie season, big time license, lots of action.

It's going to make a ton of money.

BTW, wasnt that the same argument people tried to use when they were convinced Transformers was going to bomb?
what?

Transformers had great trailers, great Special Effects showcased and a prime July release date.

I seriously dont forsee GI Joe to be anything more than a bomb at worst and an underachiever at best.
 
I've seen the trailer three or four times now. I really don't see where people's complaints about "bad" special effects are coming from. Everything looks great!
 
Transformers was awesome. So was van helsing and the mummy 1 and 2. GAF is pretty highbrow I mean I thought children of men sucked badly. I love alfonso cuaron but that movie imo sucked, it made no sense and a world without children? Isnt that awesome? I hate kids.

I wasnt much into gi joe as a kid I just thought the action figures were bad ass. Man I loved the white ninja dude, it was hard to come by those action figures too.

Day 1 just for Sienna's magical bra and the chick that plays the redhead actually has a REAL fantastic rack. They need to pimp her out more in the previews for real.

NicholsScarlett.jpg
 
Dead said:
what?

Transformers had great trailers, great Special Effects showcased and a prime July release date.

I seriously dont forsee GI Joe to be anything more than a bomb at worst and an underachiever at best.
I shall have to bookmark your post for future ownage and great justice. The movie will be a hit.

The movie will not bomb. Last I checked, August was still Summer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom