• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Most dominating athlete of all time?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Currently, it would have to be...

Flloyd-Mayweather.jpg
 
Currently, it would have to be...
People can't read names by looking at photos...

But I can't take that record seriously, when he can chose whom and when to fight. And not much compared to Wladimir Klitschko, who's champion of WBA (Super), IBF, WBO, IBO and The Ring.
 
For those doubting Wilt or saying Bill Russell was better:

And how did Wilt fare against his great nemesis, Bill Russell, throughout his career in head-to-head matchups? Was he shut down, as some claim? Hardly.

According to Philadelphia76ers stat man Harvey Pollack, Chamberlain and Russell played head-to-head a total of 142 times. In those matchups, Wilt averaged 28.7 PPG and 28.7 RPG. Russell, on the other hand, averaged 23.7 PPG, and 14.5 RPG.

WhatÂ’s of note is that ChamberlainÂ’s career rebounding average was 22.9 RPG, while RussellÂ’s was 22.5 RPG. Appears Wilt destroyed Bill on the boards any time he faced him.

Also of note is the fact Wilt scored 62 points in a game against Russell on January 14, 1962 in Boston, and scored more than 50 points against him in six other games. The most points Russell ever scored against Wilt? 37. Also, Russell only scored more than 30 against Wilt two other times.

As K.C. Jones once put it in describing WiltÂ’s power, "He stopped me dead in my tracks with his arm, hugged me and lifted me off the floor with my feet dangling," Jones said. "It scared the hell out of me. When I went to the free-throw line, my legs were still shaking. Wilt was the strongest guy and best athlete ever to play the game. [Source: Goliath's Wonderful Life, Hoop Magazine; May 1999; Chris Ekstrand]

Another story comes from Wilt’s greatest rival, Bill Russell, who knew only too well how powerful Chamberlain was. As he puts it, “I still remember the time when one of our strongest men, Gene Conley, decided to fight Chamberlain for the ball. He [Conley] grabbed it and hung on and Chamberlain just lifted him and the ball right up towards the rim.” – Bill Russell, “Go Up for Glory” p. 126.

Most amazing about all this, is that in his great and lengthy 14-year career, he never once fouled out of a game. I mean, just imagine what that must have taken in terms of control. Despite all of the rough treatment by opposing defenses, he was able to control himself enough to never receive enough fouls to be tossed from a game.

Of note is the fact that there have been only three seven-footers in NBA history who have led the league in rebounding. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar did it one time in his career. David Robinson also did it once (although Hakeem Olajuwon missed qualifying for the title by five boards and claims himself heÂ’s only 6'11"). Wilt? He did it an astounding 11 times.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...t-chamberlain-is-the-greatest-nba-player-ever

He was also responsible for several rule changes, including widening the lane from 12 to 16 feet, as well as changes to rules regarding inbounding the ball and shooting free throws.
 
For those doubting Wilt or saying Bill Russell was better:











http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...t-chamberlain-is-the-greatest-nba-player-ever

He was also responsible for several rule changes, including widening the lane from 12 to 16 feet, as well as changes to rules regarding inbounding the ball and shooting free throws.

Like I said before he dominated in a league that was extremely underdeveloped. The NBA changing the rule because of Wilt proves just that.
 
Wayne Gretzky.

He holds the NHL record for most career goals of all time, yet if you take away ALL of his goals, he still has more assists than ANYONE else has career points (goals and assists combined).

Nobody comes close.
 
There are so many athletes I've never seen enough of, so it's hard for me to say definitively who the most dominating athlete was.

If I had to throw out an athlete, it'd be young MJ. Young Michael Jordan was the scariest athlete I've ever seen clips of, other than maybe young Mike Tyson. NOBODY could touch him. The only person that could stop Michael, even then, was Michael. One of the greatest teams of all time, the 1986 Celtics, mostly breezed through the playoffs (and swept the Bulls), but not a single player on that team could stop Michael. It's incredible to watch, even now.

Fun fact: Jordan's PPG average in three games against the Celtics: 43.7. That's not a typo. Oh, and he did this after breaking his foot earlier that season.
 
There are so many athletes I've never seen enough of, so it's hard for me to say definitively who the most dominating athlete was.

If I had to throw out an athlete, it'd be young MJ. Young Michael Jordan was the scariest athlete I've ever seen clips of, other than maybe young Mike Tyson. NOBODY could touch him. The only person that could stop Michael, even then, was Michael. One of the greatest teams of all time, the 1986 Celtics, mostly breezed through the playoffs (and swept the Bulls), but not a single player on that team could stop Michael. It's incredible to watch, even now.

Fun fact: Jordan's PPG average in three games against the Celtics: 43.7. That's not a typo. Oh, and he did this after breaking his foot earlier that season.

"I didn't think anyone was capable of doing what Michael has done to us," marveled Celtics ace Larry Bird. "He is the most exciting, awesome player in the game today. I think it's just God disguised as Michael Jordan."
 
Mayweather is extremely dominant but he's allowed haters and skeptics to bring up a caveat about the fights that he's perceived to have ducked from. That Manny fight should have happened years ago and while it's not entirely Floyd's fault they could never come to terms, people believed he ducked that fight and perception is as impactful as reality when it comes to legacy debates.
He has to know that in the back of his mind that when he hangs up the gloves and his career is ranked among the all time greats.
 
Took nearly half a page for someone go mention Bo Jackson?

Y'all should be ashamed.

except you

Bo Jackson didn't dominate any sports at any time in his professional career.

I posted this back on page 2. The short version of it is:

Bo Jackson had below average NFL numbers, and average MLB numbers except for 1 season where he was the ~15th best player in MLB that season.

Comparable NFL players today to Bo Jackson: Bilal Powell, Joique Bell, Lamar Miller. All three are actually better, and I don't think anybody in 20 years would ever say "wow, remember when Bilal powell was the most dominating athlete in the NFL?"

Bo Jackson isn't in this conversation, unless we're talking about his Heismann winning football season which, while good, is not overly remarkable for college football running backs.

In baseball, Jackson only batted over .260 twice, never batted over .280. He had 100 RBIs in one season. Jackson had very good season in MLB, and the rest were average, but even his very good season, the '89 Royals, he wasn't a top 10 player that year... In fact, he was only #10 on the AL MVP voting.

In football, Jackson is remembered for a handful of flashy, exciting plays, but statistically he is less than mediocre. Jackson never broke 1000 yards rushing, and his career average is around 600 yards/season. He was even less useful receiving, only breaking 100 yards receiving once in his career. Statistically, if we were to compare Jackson's career averages to other modern day players he would be comparable to such all time greats as NYJ backup running back BIlal Powel, Detroit RB Joique Bell, Lamar Mlller, and just about every other fantasy football career waiver wire schlub.

Jackson is an exciting tremendous athlete who will be known for a few mesmerizing highlights... a 90 yard run as an Oakland Raider, standing backflips, and running along the wall in Kansas City to make an out. But, otherwise, he is the definition of average. His only exceptional season was his Heisman trophy run at Auburn, but even then, that pales in comparison to many other Heisman trophy seasons.
 
Don Bradman and Wayne Gretzky set records that will never be broken.
While I don't necessarily disagree with you, how exactly can you claim they'll never be broken? Is their respective sport simply no longer what it was at that time to simply not allow it to be broken or were they that good that you just don't feel anyone will ever play at that level again? Not being a dick, honest question.
 
Crosby got a big push, and even Wayne said "this kid is going to break my records," but really, it's impossible. I think Gretzky would lead the league if you took him in his prime and dropped him in today, but probably with about 150pts. I don't see 200 point seasons being possible the way the league is now today.

No, the level of play today is much higher than it was when Gretzky played. Look at the goalies first of all.
 
Schumacher 2000-2004. Never forget. Had to change the rules multiple times to slow him down (kinda worked in 2003, worked in 2005) and in the end only a stroke of bad luck prevented title No.8 in 2006. Car crapped out on him in the second-last race while he was waaay ahead of Alonso and had another malfunction in the last race which forced him back to the last position. Nontheless managed to roll up the field from behind a get to a respectable 5th (sixth? Idk my memory is a bit hazy) place in the end.

Best driver Germany ever had, Vettel is close but not as talented. Vettel always had the best car in the field when he won his titles, Schumacher did not have this luxury with Benetton and the early Ferraris.

Edit: Klitschko brothers. When's the last time one of them lost? I honestly don't remember. First time a single person holds all major titles near? IF a unification match happens I'm pretty certain the remaining Klitschko will take it.
 
@KHlover ^Not even in motorsport.

Mick Doohan was a far more dominant driver in a more competitive code. I rate Michael as the second best F1 driver of all time, but lets not pretend Damon Hill wasnt a mug and the Ferraris he won in werent a cut above.

EDIT: Leaving out Valentino, whom I rate higher cause he's not done yet.
 
Bo Jackson didn't dominate any sports at any time in his professional career.

I posted this back on page 2. The short version of it is:

Bo Jackson had below average NFL numbers, and average MLB numbers except for 1 season where he was the ~15th best player in MLB that season.

Comparable NFL players today to Bo Jackson: Bilal Powell, Joique Bell, Lamar Miller. All three are actually better, and I don't think anybody in 20 years would ever say "wow, remember when Bilal powell was the most dominating athlete in the NFL?"

He never even got 200 touches in a season while rushing though. Seems like he shared carries with Marcus Allen, so I can see why his numbers wouldn't be that of a mainly 1 RB system. I wouldn't say 5.4 YPC is below average.
 
Probably correct. In an era where every hitter was using PEDs, Pedro put together the most dominating string of seasons in history.

But I can't believe no one has mentioned Bill Russell. Pretty much no one else could win when he was playing. We're talking 11 NBA championships, two NCAA championships, and an Olympic gold medal. People are saying Wilt here? Wilt couldn't beat Russell. Winning matters and no one won more than Bill Russell.

I'm surprised no one mentioned Greg Maddux...I've seen a couple suggest Randy Johnson as well as Pedro and they were certainly impressive given their dominance during the PED era.

Randy and Pedro were power pitchers though, Maddux dominated through incredible location and simply being smarter than everyone he faced, if he was struggling he didn't have a dominate fastball to fall back on like those guys and he was just as dominate during the same era.
 
No, the level of play today is much higher than it was when Gretzky played. Look at the goalies first of all.

Look at 36-37 year old Gretzky's statistics in the dead puck era playing for a team with much less talent than the 1980s Oilers. He still was a 90+ point player, almost hitting 100 points. Put Gretzky in any era and he would dominate the rest of the league. He's way better than Crosby. Crosby is a great player, but he's not an all-time great. Jaromir Jagr matched Crosby even with his advanced age.

We don't have a transcendent star in the NHL right now. We have some excellent players like Crosby that have a pretty good lead on the next guy these past few seasons, but no one that is above and beyond the next player in the league like Gretzky was in the 80s.

If you're going to put him in a different era, you should also give him advanced training, lifting, etc. He would be even better than he was in the 80s. Gretzky dominated the sport like no other. It's not even close.
 
I asked my dad this question a few weeks ago. His answer...Secretariat. No joke.

American Thoroughbred racehorse that in 1973 became the first U.S. Triple Crown winner in 25 years. He set race records in all three events in the series – the Kentucky Derby (1:59 2/5), the Preakness Stakes (1:53), and the Belmont Stakes (2:24) – records that still stand today.
 
In sheer hindsight, Wayne Gretzky kind of puts people from other major team sports to shame.

Dude owns at least 65 records. You take away every goal he ever scored and he would still have more points than any other player ever.

Look at 36-37 year old Gretzky's statistics in the dead puck era playing for a team with much less talent than the 1980s Oilers. He still was a 90+ point player, almost hitting 100 points. Put Gretzky in any era and he would dominate the rest of the league. He's way better than Crosby. Crosby is a great player, but he's not an all-time great. Jaromir Jagr matched Crosby even with his advanced age.
.

This I have a problem with.

Crosby is a generational talent. He is, most definitely, the best player of the last 10 years of NHL hockey. He could very easily be the second highest scorer in league history should he avoid significant injuries. He will be top-10 with a bullet, EASILY.

He will most definitely be an all-time great by the end of his career, likely exceeding names like Yzerman, Sakic, Forsberg, etc from the generation before him.
 
Umm... Michel Phelps? Most delcrated Olympian of all time

Floyd, he beats everyone including The Big Show.

Jon Jones if he can keep doing what hes doing for a few more years.

can't say that without mentioning Anderson Silva. He held the belt for over 10 years. Thats unreal

Michael phelps

the only correct answer. What this man has done MAY never be matched in any sport. Lol @ Floyd he is a good boxer but a bad face for it.
 
Basketball- Jordan was probably the most dominating player I've ever seen in basketball considering he was a guard, not a power forward or center.

Boxing-Ali but that's really before my time. I would say Maywether for me. I don't think there's anyone who can beat him right now and what the guy does to other boxers in the ring is simply astounding.

Tennis- Federer. His sheer dominance before Nadal came along was just staggering.
 
While I don't necessarily disagree with you, how exactly can you claim they'll never be broken? Is their respective sport simply no longer what it was at that time to simply not allow it to be broken or were they that good that you just don't feel anyone will ever play at that level again? Not being a dick, honest question.

To answer that in regards to Bradman. His batting average is 99.94 (that is per dismissal). Typically the great batsmen have averages of around 50. It varies depending on era, but for example, Kallis has 55.37, Tendulkar 53.78, Lara 52.88, Sangakkara 58 (still playing), and the next closest is 60.97. That is a 39 run difference per dismissal. That is huge.

But it isn't just the statistics that separate him. He played in an era where pitches were uncovered and therefore more difficult to bat on. They did not wear helmets or protective gear. Bats nowadays are bigger and the pitches smaller. Not as many games were played; therefore the best bowlers were fresher (although you could also argue that playing more games can fatigue the batsman, though surely less than it does bowlers).

On the other hand, modern professional cricket has made bowlers fitter and fielding better which theoretically makes it harder to score. More professional, technological analysis has given teams more information on opponents with which to get them out better.

Generally, though, it is easier than ever to be a batsman nowadays. Bradman was an anomaly. Look at this graph to see just how far in excess of everyone he is. That is across 137 years of Test cricket.

CricketBattingAverageHistogram.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom