Tintin. The lighting was fucking ridiculous when he's inspecting the mansion for instance. And there were just a lot of great looking scenes in that film.
That photorealistic look is ILM's bread and butter, particularly hard surface modeling. You likely don't notice such effects (i.e. digital sets, extensions, etc) because they're usually in the background and something else is drawing your eye in a shot. That said, some of the environment work in Rango is easily the best we've done and has fooled even some of our senior engineers who weren't on the show into thinking they used live plates for some of it.
And Pixar has never really gone for a truly photorealistic look in their films aside from the first bit of Wall-E, so why call them out on it?