• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Movies You've Seen Recently |OT| March 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
Judex: A deliciously pulpy ode to silent film serials, the film practically dares you to stay ahead of it as it throws in one crazy and unthinkable twist after another. The contrivances are certain to be too much for some, but everything keeps moving at such a brisk pace that it's hard to stay with one for too long as it moves onto the next and oftentimes more delightfully nutty addition to the pile-up. It also really helps that director Georges Franju keeps everything looking nice and pristine, all while staging some rather striking scenes, including the title character's grand entrance to the film at a themed costume ball. Not that this should be that surprising, given his already adept styling of another kind of throwback in Eyes Without a Face, but it was a real treat to see him just have some fun while not losing all the things one likes about his technique. The cast is also pretty terrific, retaining the services of the always enchanting Edith Scob and gaining the valuable presence of real-life illusionist Channing Pollock as our hero and Francine Bergé as a femme fatale whose dangerous ambition is surpassed only by her wardrobe rotation frequency. Deeply entertaining from beginning to end.
 
It was a good movie but sure as hell was kind of bland. I was reading GAF and fucking around the whole time because the movie didn't really hold my attention. After I watched that yt video it all came together and I think I like it more after than during lol.

Wouldn't have needed that video explanation if you weren't browsing GAF while watching the movie. ;)
Actually, i don't know if i'd call it bland, a bit like Sicario, i think the style actually saved the movie, overall.
 
Can't argue there. Unfortunately, my prof showed a compressed 280p version from Youtube so I couldn't really enjoy even that aspect that much.

It was a good movie but sure as hell was kind of bland. I was reading GAF and fucking around the whole time because the movie didn't really hold my attention. After I watched that yt video it all came together and I think I like it more after than during lol.

these are sad posts

Thanks for the video, however i didn't have that many problem piecing together most of that stuff, it's that the
schizophrenic double identity narrative trope to explore two sides of internal tumult
, feels a bit overplayed for me.
I think it's part of the reason why i also didn't end up loving The Double, despite being wildly different from this.
You have to excuse them, being taken by books, but i'm talking about personal enjoyment.
And i must admit, a couple of scenes came off as somewhat comical in their symbolism (
the stripper squashing the spider
).

It wasn't a bad movie by any means though.

watching more bergman would help
 
Ugh I can't imagine being in film school with youtube. Like how easily accessible so much stuff is and yet it probably looks like garbage and is compressed to hell. Is this specifically an animation class? Like they don't have the budget to spend like $200 and get at least half of the Looney Tunes collection that's easily available on the DVD set and the blu-rays to keep as an archive?

This is an animation theory class where my prof owns some DVDs, but uses Youtube for a lot of stuff. She showed us a recorded from TCM fullscreen copy of Who Framed Roger Rabbit a couple weeks ago though and also frequently will show older stuff from Youtube too.

It's bothersome because she's the only prof who does the Youtube deal but so it goes.
 
you too clever for me JC

these Hard Boiled gifs, man. Like, it should be teached in school alongside the holy post modern sequences of McTiernan and the parable of sacred genre resurrection told by pontiff Miller. A mandatory sacrificial Snyder dvd to vhs (because you ain't gonna waste more than tape for him) every time Alan and Tequila kill an unnamed nobody. It saddens the heart to realize how low the level has sunk
 
watching more bergman would help
Not sure where to go after Fanny & Alexander.
I think i'm in love with his style more than i was expecting going in, but he made so much stuff.

Actually, i think i'm going to do some directors i've been putting off for a while, but that don't have as deep a filmography to go through.

I've had the bluray of A Zed & Two Noughts for like 5 years, so i'll probably do Greenway next.
 
Wouldn't have needed that video explanation if you weren't browsing GAF while watching the movie. ;)
Actually, i don't know if i'd call it bland, a bit like Sicario, i think the style actually saved the movie, overall.

Yea...I know but the movie itself wasn't the most engaging to me anyway. Sicario held my interest and was freaking gorgeous to boot. There were so many dead spaces in Enemy. I caught all the symbols but didn't put 2 & 2 together. Sadly I was really excited about the whole thing but it was just a bit flat. Like I would watch as it got interesting but then it would go off into space again and I'd get bored again. Lack of action I guess. Then you take something like Eyes Wide Shut which was kind of a snoozer in the first half but ramped up hard later. That managed to hold my interest all the way too.
 
you too clever for me JC

these Hard Boiled gifs, man. Like, it should be teached in school alongside the holy post modern sequences of McTiernan and the parable of sacred genre resurrection told by pontiff Miller. A mandatory sacrificial Snyder dvd to vhs (because you ain't gonna waste more than tape for him) every time Alan and Tequila kill an unnamed nobody. It saddens the heart to realize how low the level has sunk

Id go every Sunday to that church

And urbanrats have you seen persona, hour of the Wolf or seventh seal?
 
image.php


what is this

where is eva green
 
Not sure where to go after Fanny & Alexander.
I think i'm in love with his style more than i was expecting going in, but he made so much stuff.

Actually, i think i'm going to do some directors i've been putting off for a while, but that don't have as deep a filmography to go through.

I've had the bluray of A Zed & Two Noughts for like 5 years, so i'll probably do Greenway next.

through a glass darkly is very much like the enemy. hours of the wolf, persona would be in the same vein.
 
Rewatched High and Low. Even better the second time around. Good lord. Movies really don't get much better than this.

I love how Kurosawa denies easy explanations for the antagonist here. It makes the whole situation far more complex, human, and haunting than if he were just a social allegory.

It's also an easy contender for best final shot/scene out there.
 
The Concert, eh, it's not that it's bad, it's just not much of anything. Plays it so safe, sacchariney, trying to pander to everyone like one of those insipid recent Angloeuroamerican tv shows, but actors are splendid, got a good energy and plays the audience like a fiddle, meaning I cried at the end. And Melanie Laurent, jesus Christ, so beautiful
 
Rewatched High and Low. Even better the second time around. Good lord. Movies really don't get much better than this.

I love how Kurosawa denies easy explanations for the antagonist here. It makes the whole situation far more complex, human, and haunting than if he were just a social allegory.

It's also an easy contender for best final shot/scene out there.

It's astonishing. Kurosawa's better-known for the samurai stuff, but this, Ikiru, and The Bad Sleep Well are, in most ways, even more cogent and daring.
 
through a glass darkly is very much like the enemy. hours of the wolf, persona would be in the same vein.
Oh yeah, i don't have a problem with the idea of schizophrenic characters, the physical representation of them as two separate people, under the guise of a mystery, is what put me off.

But it's not a hard rule, i mean i like Double Life of Veronique, and that plays with the idea (although not schizophrenia) and even in Persona, i saw it as Liv and Bibi Andersson being two distinct characters, melding into one (rather than one splitting into two), but then it's not played like a mystery.

I'll say, Through a Glass Darkly is probably entered my top 10.
And that also has spiders symbolism in it, representing men instead of women.
 
This is an animation theory class where my prof owns some DVDs, but uses Youtube for a lot of stuff. She showed us a recorded from TCM fullscreen copy of Who Framed Roger Rabbit a couple weeks ago though and also frequently will show older stuff from Youtube too.

It's bothersome because she's the only prof who does the Youtube deal but so it goes.

Can I just come be in your class? I'd be glad to provide my blu-ray copies of this stuff haha

First episode of Fanny & Alexander didn't captivate me nearly as much as Scenes from a marriage, it was dense and visually intense, but it felt meandering and didn't get a good sense for the characters, in an hour and a half.
I usually like Bergman's economy, and it felt lacking here.
As i did for SfaM, i'll post my impressions when i'm done with the whole thing, however, it feels like this was merely a (very lengthy) prologue.

I would say the first episode is probably my favorite of the bunch. It very much has a feeling of just being in these peoples lives in a very specific moment in time more than anything. I think (hope) you'll come to appreciate it more once you watch the rest of it.
 
Hi there, just joined Letterboxd two days ago, would be happy for anyone to follow me and will follow back -> http://letterboxd.com/Schaukelrabauke/

Just wrote my first "realtime" review over there:

Zootopia 2016 ★★★☆☆

Cute. While the main protagonist, little rabbit lady Judy Hopps, doesn't want to be called like this if you're not a fellow rabbit, it is the perfect word to describe her film.

This furry tag-team crime story delivers some creative and likeable world building featuring animal-themed humor, which did manage to get quite some chuckles out of me.

However, as the story goes forward, it becomes more and more evident that Zootopia is mainly made to appeal for a younger audience. There are some bits for the older ones, sure (like a small reference to Breaking Bad or a lovely The Godfather one), but recent animation hits like Upside Down or Lego Movie managed to do the balancing act quite a bit better.

It doesn't help that, if you would scratch the animal skin off the movie (not literally speaking :>), you'd end up with a story basically told a thousand times already. And often better. Particularly the transition between the ending of the second act (the downfall/struggle of the hero) and the re-emerge/comeback in act 3 is super rushed and adds to an increasingly unconvincing development of especially the fox, our second main character. Again, it shows that a young audience was the first thing in mind.

From a technical viewpoint, the animation was nice and the 3D actually almost felt good compared to the redundant rip-off they call 3D in nearly all other films (still probably not worth the additional fee). The sound mixing unfortunately left a lot to be desired for me in at least two of the major action scenes.
There's a chase scene in the rainforest for example, where there's next to no ambient sound (while there's a storm going on!), little to no music and almost no impact to all the sound effects. Overall a real immersion breaker for those scenes.

In the words of Double Toasted (<3), I would rate this a high matinee.

PS: The "german" title for this film is, oddly enough, Zoomania. Can we finally catch this one guy who does this kind of stuff all the time please?
 
Director's Cut of Nymphomaniac: Volume II. Flowed much better than the theatrical cut and was a lot more enjoyable because of it. That
abortion
scene was incredibly graphic though. Fucking hell!
 
My Batman v Superman write up:
Okay! So to elaborate more, the first half of the film, maybe first third, is just disjointed. It's very easy to tell that cuts were made to trim down the time, and while it never feels like anything important was left out, what it is missing are scenes that just so slightly stitch the the film together, something as simple as Clark just flying somewhere instead of appearing there. Thankfully, the second half of the film, aside from a small section that appears to be rushed or cut up to reach a specific place, flows really well and naturally. It never slows down in the second half, and it's kicked off with a bang. As someone who read spoilers and plenty of impressions and such, they can't prepare you for some scenes and their impact.

As for the characters I've been an avid optimistic of Eisenbergs Lex Luthor, and after seeing the movie I don't think they quite knew what they wanted to do with the character. One moment he's very Zuckerberg, and the next he's psychotic, then after that he becomes compelling even though they don't spend much time on his motivations. He has less presence than you'd think (at least for me) and a small quirk I appreciated is him talking about his fathers past life.

Batman in this movie is very, very traumatized. I recently watched Dark Knight Returns this weekend, and the trauma between the two versions of the characters is about on par. He's cruel, unrelenting, and probably has the biggest character arc in the movie. They really nailed certain aspects of Bruce, such as the billionaire playboy.

For the few scenes Gal had, she really nailed Wonder Woman. While her time was brief, you really got to know the type of person she is, and that's someone who really doesn't want to deal with the world of man anymore. Won't say much more on her.

Superman in this movie struggles with finding his place in the world. Circumstances of the movie pull him from one side of views to another, until ultimately he is lost. This isn't your boyscout superman yet, but he is getting there. The movie and his arc was about finding his place in our world and the world finding a place for superman. Cavil did a fine job again, but was out shadowed by other performances who had more to do.

There's some little Easter eggs that you may not miss too. I believe I heard one for Mask of Phantasm, a joke by Perry which references the year Superman first appeared in comics, and I think I heard one for Shazam too. Keep your ears peaked.

The nightmare sequence was also extremely out of place and it definitely should have been cut or reworked into something else.

As for the rest of the cameos; some say they are out of place, but the film doesn't focus too much on them. One actually caught me off guard with how it's portrayed.

That's all for tonight though. If I had to give it any sort of rating or predict one, I'd throw it somewhere between 79-87% depending entirely on how certain people feel about certain things.
 
I would say the first episode is probably my favorite of the bunch. It very much has a feeling of just being in these peoples lives in a very specific moment in time more than anything. I think (hope) you'll come to appreciate it more once you watch the rest of it.
It did have that "fly on the wall" feel, I just wasn't that intrigued by what I saw, as that fly.
Coming from Scenes from a marriage must have been a bit of a shock, since that one was so relentless.

Given that both F&A and Enemy didn't catch my interest strongly though, maybe yesterday I was just cranky.
 
Broadway Danny Rose - Woody Allen

This might be one of his most formulaic movies. It's a simple movie (as the structure itself kinda adheres to, as this is merely a recollection of a story at a dinner table), with some fun characters and Woody as the agent is charming and fun as always but the rest is a little stale. Mia Farrow seems kinda bored in the whole thing.
 
It did have that "fly on the wall" feel, I just wasn't that intrigued by what I saw, as that fly.
Coming from Scenes from a marriage must have been a bit of a shock, since that one was so relentless.

Given that both F&A and Enemy didn't catch my interest strongly though, maybe yesterday I was just cranky.

scenes from a marriage is so good but not really like any of the other bergman stuff I've seen.. which is admittedly only a handful

watched fanny & alexander tv a few years ago and remember being equally "eh" about it.. will probably rewatch it sometime in the future i can't recall much about it atm
 
scenes from a marriage is so good but not really like any of the other bergman stuff I've seen.. which is admittedly only a handful

watched fanny & alexander tv a few years ago and remember being equally "eh" about it.. will probably rewatch it sometime in the future i can't recall much about it atm
Well I watched the second and third act today, and I sort of turned around on it, shit hit the fan, and that prologue suddenly made total sense.
 
Cries and Whispers - I really need to stop watching such emotionally heavy films before I go to sleep. This film is superb. The first few Bergman film I saw were all in black and white but Bergman in color is such a tremendous thing to experience. Intense acting across the board and holy shit at the scene with
Liv Ullmann and the broken piece of wine glass.
Easily up there as one of my favorite Bergman films. 8/10

Bon Voyage - Hitchcock propaganda short film about a crashed down RAF pilot who has to escape enemy territory. Quite a step up from his other propaganda film, Aventure Malgache, which I found to be pretty dull. This one embodies more of his British spy thrillers and shares some hallmark Hitchcock direction. Has a bit of a twist to it although it doesn't come as a surprise. Not bad for what it is. 6/10

For all those in the US who have cable, Turner Classic Movies (GOAT channel, btw) are doing a 5 film Kurosawa marathon tomorrow so it might be a good idea to set your DVRs.

They're showing:
No Regrets For Our Youth (1946)
Stray Dog (1949)
Seven Samurai (1956)
The Bad Sleep Well (1960)
High And Low (1963)

Shamefully, having seen none of these. I'm real excited.... even though I've owned Seven Samurai for a long time.
 
Cries and Whispers - I really need to stop watching such emotionally heavy films before I go to sleep. This film is superb. The first few Bergman film I saw were all in black and white but Bergman in color is such a tremendous thing to experience. Intense acting across the board and holy shit at the scene with
Liv Ullmann and the broken piece of wine glass.
Easily up there as one of my favorite Bergman films. 8/10
Isn't Ingrid Thulin the one with the worst broken glass scene? Yet Liv Ullmann has still the cruelest moment, at the end, fuck that made me feel gutted.
 
The Wave (2015) - Pretty good Norwegian natural disaster flick. Wasn't really anything I hadn't seen before but it was done well enough that I didn't care. I liked the tension of the lead-up to the disaster a lot. A few scenes towards the end were pretty damn claustrophobic . Seemed refreshingly down to earth compared to some of the disaster movies I've seen that become overblown CGI obstacle courses. Tone was serious and not full of annoying fools like in a Roland Emmerich film. 3.5/5- good movie.
 
Lady Snowblood (Toshiya Fujita, 1973)

Story about a woman gaining revenge and it did a good job of making an actual story of it outside of just a generic revenge plot. The only problem is that I could see a certain plot-twist coming from a mile away. I do like how it shows how vengeance ultimately needs to nothing, though.
 
For all those in the US who have cable, Turner Classic Movies (GOAT channel, btw) are doing a 5 film Kurosawa marathon tomorrow so it might be a good idea to set your DVRs.

They're showing:
No Regrets For Our Youth (1946)
Stray Dog (1949)
Seven Samurai (1956)
The Bad Sleep Well (1960)
High And Low (1963)

Shamefully, having seen none of these. I'm real excited.... even though I've owned Seven Samurai for a long time.

Oh wow thanks for the heads up. Haven't seen No Regrets, Stray Dog, or Bad Sleep Well. Def gonna record those. And yeah...watch Seven Samurai like yesterday.
 
For all those in the US who have cable, Turner Classic Movies (GOAT channel, btw) are doing a 5 film Kurosawa marathon tomorrow so it might be a good idea to set your DVRs.

They're showing:
No Regrets For Our Youth (1946)
Stray Dog (1949)
Seven Samurai (1956)
The Bad Sleep Well (1960)
High And Low (1963)

Shamefully, having seen none of these. I'm real excited.... even though I've owned Seven Samurai for a long time.

thx for the heads up.. that remind me i still have andrei rublev on my dvr from TCM.. i look at the runtime though and I'm just like fuuuuu
 
Indieflix shorts on Hulu:

2:22. Pretty cool 8 minute take on someone waking up in a bad way.

Moving a Mountain. Some dude goes to Armenia to make a piece of art in iron. Kind of cool. Pretty much a 17 minute documentary.
 
With dialogue so refreshingly human, a mise-en-scène so immaculate (with the essence of hotels captured beautifully) and a couple of near-genius directorial strokes, it's a shame Anomalisa doesn't get to be better than it actually is, partly because it doesn't get as much out of its main conceit as it might like to. It overtly displays its major themes from the very beginning - with the central one being a curious take on prosopagnosia caused by a spanning life crisis - and then presents them as a big character revelation at the end. In reality, it is at this point where the film falls short, where it would have required more work, more differentiation, the desire to really press on.

While the puppet motif works well in conjunction with the thematic undercurrents, the same cannot be said about the discursive threads surrounding the idea of 'service' and everything it entails, from language to behaviour and philosophy. Michael being haunted by chimaeras of 'service' while simultaneously not being adherent in the least to his maxims is nothing but the movie tripping over its own feet - as a 'blind motif', it's a big one to stomach. Kaufman makes it all too easy for himself with the fine print and sketches his character in one big stroke instead resulting in a failure to get ahold of his protagonist and - the actual demerit - the failure of not being aware of a psychological safari stopped dead in its tracks.

Finally, no movie should ever attempt the 'talkative taxi driver' trope again unless it has something meaningful or at all funny to add to it.

A well-shot but not particularly well-considered piece.
 
Razredni sovraznik - Rok Bicek

This is a nice Slovenian movie about the relationship created between students, teachers and how impactful they can be. Something happens to one of them, and it generates a mass-reaction which leads to an interesting presentation about our society and how it is structured. A nice little movie. I am most certainly not versed in slovenian filmmaking, but I really liked the style.

I also saw Avengers Ultron, which is the worst movie I've seen in a while. Hard to believe Whedon became a hollywood director. Can't say it's worse than the first one though.
 
Man of Steel is an incredibly fun movie, although it has very recognizable flaws. Cavill's Superman is a joy to watch, despite the "realistic" atmosphere. The rest of the cast works well too, with an engaged Crowe and delightfully hammy Shannon being highlights. The Smallville fight might be one of the best superhero sequences put on film; it's certainly one of the coolest. Unfortunately, the writing is pretty awful, sometime adding unintentional hilarity to scenes. Also, the final setpiece of the film is far too prolonged, and becomes a mess of CGI not interested in the idea of Superman. It becomes too in love with the excess that Snyder has mastered, and the denouement from said sequence is far too short to really bring the film back to greatness. Although suffering from a poor third act, Man of Steel is pretty fun and exciting to see. It's just a shame that we most likely won't get a proper sequel for it anytime soon.

Also, to complain about Xfinity; how the fuck does cropping still exist in this day and age?
 
Knight of Cups is like Leviathan (the Harvard one, not the Russian one) but instead of tossing gopros around an industrial fishing boat to catch nightmarish fractured images of fish and fowl and metal and churning water Malick and Chico throw gopros around LA/Southern California to conjure a distorted dream of beautiful women and deserts and beaches and glass buildings and still water. His most experimental work yet, comparable to Godard in the extent formal experimentation (if only marginally in terms of how they each experiment) though that Malick does it on an even bigger scale with big-name actors like Christian Bale is surreal. A great vivid experience, and it quells any worries I had after To the Wonder. Can't wait to see what he has in store for Weightless, see if the early talk that he's done something entirely different and unexpected is mere hype or another late period curveball. Also can't wait to see this again.
I think people did Malick rankings recently but I'll add mine:
Tree of Life > Thin Red Line > Days of Heaven > New World > Badlands = Knight of Cups > To the Wonder
 
Starship Troopers: I'm doing my part! I did like this movie. Good amount of world-building, I especially like the newscasts. The practical effects are cool, but the CGI effects...not so much. I also like how the movie doesn't end at the end of the war. Yes, I am aware of the notion of the humans being the invaders, and thus the bad guys here.
 
Lady Snowblood 2: Love Song of Vengeance (Toshiya Fujita, 1974)

I liked the first one, but honestly, I didn't think a sequel was needed. Felt like the main protagonist's arc was concluded nicely in the first film, and this sequel didn't really convince me otherwise.
 
Have you guys read Armond White review of Hateful Eight? Some next-level projections.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/428923/hateful-eights-racial-insults

Titled after cut-rate Italian spaghetti westerns, The Hateful Eight dramatizes another of QT&#8217;s references to social chaos, specifically, the 2012 movie-theater massacre in Aurora, Colo.
Wtf....

That&#8217;s not a stretch; the two-part Kill Bill was QT&#8217;s proto&#8211;Abu Ghraib satire.

The rest is pure vitriol. A very funny text.

I saw the movie last night and it's surely the worst "Tarantino" movie (I exclude Jackie Brown from this criteria, as it is "merely" a directorial effort). I would be lying if I didn't found it extremely entertaining, but Quentin seems to have a hard time to really put his writing in favor of his stories. All of his movies are becoming more and more transected (which is odd considering his starting point and the structure of both reservoir and pulp).

H8 is a strange long movie, one could say it's runtime allows for the crescendo of the suspense...but that's not the case, as the (simple) mystery is quickly unraveled (with some very lazy plotting based on foods and mundane habits). Then he invites us to look behind the curtain and see how it happens, in a "chapter" strangely devoided of any suspense or even useful information. We go back to the final confrontation as he presents us the unavoidable demise of the characters. Considering how The Thing was mentioned by him as a big influence, it's interesting to note Carpenter takes 2 and half minutes to succeed similarly.

I liked it but perhaps more simplicity in it's structure might have helped it quite a bit. It would still be a fairly simple movie, but a more concise one. As it is, it's an inappropriate mammoth.

Walton Goggins is a fucking american treasure.
 
Eightful Hate - I'm no big fan of Tarantino, but i at least find some enjoyment in his films.. except this time.
It felt like 6 hours of meandering and never getting to a point, filled up with not-as-sharp and not-as-interesting dialog, a drab location and visually nothing that interesting in general.
Music was good, a couple of gags made me laugh, Sam Jackson and Kurt Russell were both good, Jennifer Leigh was great, but fuck was it boring as shit.
Didn't find the twist clever, either (was that even supposed to be a twist?).

Definitely the worst thing i've seen from him, so far, if this was 1:40 minutes, i probably would've appreciated it more.
Say what you will about Django, but at least that movie had some energy and variety to keep you interested.
 
Outside of the always beautiful visual details that are tiled throughout any Miyazaki film, I thought Ponyo was rather forgettable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom