https://youtu.be/oMnxPsQanrs?t=1m8s
This movie sounds great. Who really finds Max interesting enough to have him totally headline a fourth movie, anyway? To me Rockatansky is more like a living device that just ties a bunch of disconnected wasteland adventure stories together. He's the common element. As a character he's just another stoic, quiet "wounded badass" that's been done to death in just about every genre possible.
If an interesting story is there to tell then tell it - who cares what the genders of the involved characters are?
Another 90 minutes of mostly Max, though, wouldn't have been a worthwhile story to tell, to me. It'd be a movie we'd seen a thousand times before.
The world has enough middle-school masculine masturbatory action movies.
And there are plenty of legitimate battle to fight when it comes to the male side of gender politics that it really messes with my head that MRA always seems to come across as "I'm a straight, white, Christian male living in the United States...but things could *still* be better for me." We've already kind of hit the existential jackpot, guys.
Discrimination is being discriminated against or being marginalized, not wanting to have *all the toys* and throwing a fit when somebody else, possibly of a different *gender* (gasp) steps into the spotlight momentarily.
I've got friends that live in one of the most hilariously, stereotypically progressive cities (Portland) in one the most progressive states (Oregon) of *the* most protective country (The United States...duh) and I'm still constantly hearing about how the world isn't pandering enough to their straight, white, christian, male selves.
I also like how that article implies that "real women" shouldn't see this movie, because "real women" know that an action movie should only star men and have the women in supporting, subservient roles.
"...if they sheepishly attend and Fury Road is a blockbuster, then you, me, and all the other men (and real women) in the world will never be able to see a real action movie ever again ..."
It's *literally* not an action movie if a woman does something meaningful in it, besides I guess maybe dying/being kidnapped to give the (male, of course) star some angsty motivation. (So original!)
And the author romanticizes Max himself *so hard* it's uncomfortable. Apparently only men can have "principles" or "stand up for things."
I don't even want to get into how ironic I find it that Mad Max is considered so hyper-masculine when, as a gay male, I can notice it's absolutely filled to the brim in *every installment* with campy, leather outfits, assless chaps, loincloths, bare male midriffs, *a sizable amount* of implied (and pretty blatant) homosexual relationships... I mean, even the cover to the first movie makes Max look like he's on his way to some 80s underground fetish club.
Remember Johnny from the first movie? Or that totally out of nowhere "let's get off our bikes and dance" scene? Or how about "Fifi," the police chief who dresses like that "Hard Gay" meme. Second movie has Wes in his assless chaps with his obviously effeminate, submissive boyfriend. Not to mention Humungus being in charge of a couple groups of gangs, one of which is literally called the "Gayboy Crazies." The poster for "Beyond Thunderdome" looks like a teaser for a Cher music video.
So apparently there can be a super obvious homoerotic thread running through an entire franchise, but I guess *that's* ok because it's still about men, right?
The more I think about this the more it just feels like out-and-out misogyny.
Totally honestly, too, I wonder if there's a significant % of MRA that are closeted or trying to come to terms with some alternate sexuality or image of masculinity.
I don't know if it's a "gay" vibe, but I definitely tend to get an "I wish I could be myself" feeling from a *lot* of these guys.