KHarvey16 said:Shouldn't the real question be, "is the game any good?"
But seriously, as a supporter of complete freedom of speech I'd defend his basic human right to make a game about anything he wants. It's obvious this games sole purpose is not to incite violence, so for me it falls under the category of protected speech.
Everyone also has the right to never play it.
FightyF said:What is the purpose of the game then?
FightyF said:What is the purpose of the game then?
Oh c'mon.Shouldn't the real question be, "is the game any good?"
But seriously, as a supporter of complete freedom of speech I'd defend his basic human right to make a game about anything he wants. It's obvious this games sole purpose is not to incite violence, so for me it falls under the category of protected speech.
Everyone also has the right to never play it.
Anasui Kishibe said:what's to debate? it's a retarded idea, made by some idiot who clearly wants some attention, unless you're going to make a Christian counterpart. In that case we'd have two retarded ideas
Hellraizer said:Oh c'mon.
SUPER PRO TIP: We know. There's like one dude in the whole thread who declared this racism.SuperAngelo64 said:Protip: Muslims aren't a race.
Yeah, I was banned for something similar in the gaming forum once so I thought better of it -- even if it's the obvious truthTimber said:Nice edit Durante, I was about to ask what that was all about![]()
White Man said:This was made by a goon, basically just to provoke people. Same goon that made the Electric Retard comics, too, I think. As implied in the post directly above mine, don't look for Electric Retard if you're, well, offended by anything.
anandxxx said:Is there a vomit smiley?
zon said:Some of the comics actually made me laugh, and I'm one of the few (I guess) in here who doesn't find the game offensive at all either. I've already "killed" all kinds of people in earlier games so I just don't understand why this should be anymore offensive.
Prine said:Hah, love this subtle innocence people play. Like they are oblivious to whats actually going on.
"I call people names all the time, I dont understand why using nicknames for race should offend anyone"
Its all about context. And this is where it gets messy, between freedom and responsibility
Campster said:Not to put words in his mouth, but I think he was pointing out how things like Call of Duty involve painting people of middle-eastern origin as universal, one-dimensional badguys whose only intent is war and destruction; where-in you kill literally hundreds of them on your crusade of ultimate good, an at no point does anyone question the morality of this in the context of current real world events.
Lonewolf_92 said:Makes me question where the creator of this "game" draws the line. If this game is acceptable, how about Matanza cofrade? Or KZ Manager (a Nazi deathcamp management sim)? Or how about Super Columbine Massacre RPG! (that game where you play as the Columbine massacre shooters)?
Like i said. Context. COD4 you play as a soldier killing middle eastern guys, but these middle eastern guys were enemies because they followed a terrorist, not for being middle eastern or following a religion.Campster said:Not to put words in his mouth, but I think he was pointing out how things like Call of Duty involve painting people of middle-eastern origin as universal, one-dimensional badguys whose only intent is war and destruction; where-in you kill literally hundreds of them on your crusade of ultimate good, an at no point does anyone question the morality of this in the context of current real world events.
I mean, Call of Duty 4 had a bloody warcrime against an middle-eastern prisoner of war that they treated as an ultra-cool act. No one questioned it, it wasn't brought up that "Hey, maybe we shouldn't have shot the unarmed guy strapped to the chair in the head after he told us what he needed." It was just assumed it's what you do.
And it really isn't a huge step from that to this. If anything, this is less dangerous as it's so obviously over the top and stupid. The uproar over Call of Duty was minimal at best.
Prine said:Hah, love this subtle innocence people play. Like they are oblivious to whats actually going on.
"I call people names all the time, I dont understand why using nicknames for race should offend anyone"
Its all about context. And this is where it gets messy, between freedom and responsibility
Campster said:The entire point is to rile you up; I don't really think he would say there is a line.
M3wThr33 said:He wants ISPs to block it? That's not cool. Censoring bigotry isn't hip in my books, even if it is retarded.
zon said:So I'm playing innocent because I don't find it more offensive than other video games? Why is this worse than, say, Postal 2? Campster had another good example too (I'll admit I never thought about the scene he mentions in that way either, I just accepted it and kept on playing).
The graphical representation in MMG is on par with c64 games as well, remove the name, the intro, the suicide bombers and the bosses and you might as well be killing computer nerds with a beard, fat ninjas, rambo wannabes and rednecks riding trucks. Shooting models that consist of maybe 100 pixels doesn't really make me think I'm killing innocent muslisms.
Frankly, if the sole purpose of the game is to shock and offend others, then why should I care about it? It's not made with the intent to make muslims look like monsters, the creator only hopes that he'll piss people off with his game.
The only thing that I did find disturbing was the introduction where a fake speech (I hope it's not real) by Bush was played.
I AM JOHN! said:Art is sometimes offensive. /thread
And thinking something is crap is an emotion, not an absolute.kamorra said:And sometimes art isn't art but rather crap.
Prine said:Your playing innocent to the obvious message this game is trying send.
Interpretation and reasoning is completely dependent on environment, and if your environment was targeted as a threat you would be singing a different tune.
Again, context is key, Postal does not focus on one specific race or group.
Im not offended, but intrigued with peoples reason to pass this off as something else other than the most obvious.
AmMortal said:This would get you jailed in Europe. Because it's offensive.
KTallguy said:There's only a small difference between what you're doing in a game like this, and what you're doing in Call of Duty 4, and many other games set in the Middle East.
True, it was made primarily for the shock-factor.
But the virtual actions your committing are the same.
The only difference is the wrapping.
I AM JOHN! said:And thinking something is crap is an emotion, not an absolute.
N-Bomb said:100% correct. The difference is that this game is up front about it, and it's done in a less than serious manner, which seems to be the big problem most people have.
It's like people don't give a crap when something is done in a 'serious' or 'reverent' manner, but satire is shat on these days...
Having been a goon for nearly a decade, I've long since come to the obvious conclusion that anything SA does that reaches the mainstream (and isn't an outright criminal act) is pretty much de facto performance art. Getting the Telegraph to print "gently caress"? Pure art.Tellaerin said:It's not a matter of emotion. It's a matter of intent. The creator wasn't setting out to create art, which is obvious from the quotes. The result is about as much 'art' as a picture of a dick drawn on a bathroom stall in magic marker is, which is to say not at all.
I'll concede that the guy's entitled to express himself this way, even though I find it foul. But don't try to play the 'art' card, because it's bullshit.
diunxx said:I must be horrible human being because I enjoyed the game and the webcomics :/