Equally idiotic to ignore her exaggerated reaction and pretend it's normal.
Love is exaggeration.
Stop projecting.
Equally idiotic to ignore her exaggerated reaction and pretend it's normal.
Equally idiotic to ignore her exaggerated reaction and pretend it's normal.
Good relationship.
What's good about it? She has feelings for someone she used to before and that person is a part of her life and will continue to be unless she makes a concious decision to stop seeing the mutual friends they have.
For all the talk about feelings and how we can't help who we develop them for. There's a distinct lack of talk about what happens when you don't pursue those often strong feelings and what the long term effects of not doing so can be.
We can argue all day that the OP should continue to work on this so called good relationship, but that's just arguing for the sake of arguing.
The reality is it's over. That's the cold hard truth. They've [been] together a few months. She has feelings for someone else, someone she used to have them for before and they'll likely be even stronger now than they were last time and if she hasn't already acted on them (she has, just based on her reaction to asked if she has), then she will very very soon.
It's done. It's over. It's donezo. It's a fantasy to pretend otherwise.
Equally idiotic to ignore her exaggerated reaction and pretend it's normal.
I guess I'm Abe Simpson yelling at a cloud but having a long distance skype relationship only seems slightly less depressing that being in a relationship with an anime body pillow.
I guess I'm Abe Simpson yelling at a cloud but having a long distance skype relationship only seems slightly less depressing that being in a relationship with an anime body pillow.
I guess I'm Abe Simpson yelling at a cloud but having a long distance skype relationship only seems slightly less depressing that being in a relationship with an anime body pillow.
Time to get ready to eject. Once a woman loses feelings for you, and especially if she has them for another guy, it's time to move on.
I guess I'm Abe Simpson yelling at a cloud but having a long distance skype relationship only seems slightly less depressing that being in a relationship with an anime body pillow.
Sorry forgot it's 2015 and someone watching you rub one out counts as intimacy now. I have to get in my Model A and go to work I'll post at you fine folks later.
Why is it insulting?Well that's just downright insulting. I don't think you know what you're talking about.
Love is exaggeration.
Stop projecting.
It's kinda hard to judge an emotional reaction when you only have a written description. How she reacted may be just how OP perceived it but given he was emotional at the time, I'm not sure how much of that I can trust.
Do you want to bang this guy?
Yes
No
Maybe.
This is not multiple choice.
Why is it insulting?
Ah, now we get to the part where I'm supposedly projected.
Sure, I'm projecting. Whatever makes you feel happy about your naive and ridiculous position.
Not much room to misinterpret her saying how disgusting she is by just the mere suggestion she may have cheated.
I've been asked before if I've cheated with a close friend of mine who I'm really close to, I wasn't disgusted by the question nor was I angered or upset by it. I didn't overreact. I merely stated I hadn't and left it there.
Language matters. Her saying she's disgusting could be a genuine example of her projecting her feelings about herself and her actions.
Send her a letter.
Write the following on it.
That'll solve everything.
Ah, now we get to the part where I'm supposedly projected.
Sure, I'm projecting. Whatever makes you feel happy about your naive and ridiculous position.
You know you just said "I know you are, but what am I", right?
Yes, it could. However, being an armchair psychologist is far from being a realist. You're still generalizing, and you're still presenting your own assertion as fact.
I've gone ahead and underlined all things that are facts that you have presented as facts, then I have used italics on all things you present as facts, that are merely your opinion, but they're either wrong or presented as facts.
See the disparity? You talk so adamantly about things that you present as facts that aren't. About the lack of talk about what happens if you don't act on the feelings, I've already accounted for that, but I don't mind reiterating. Proper relationships are based on good communication and trust. Her talking about her having feelings for someone else, but saying she still wants to be with you, means exactly that, due to it being trust and communication. If that's how she feels, she needs to figure out what those feelings mean. If in the meantime she figures that those feelings mean she'd rather be with this other person, then that will suck, but it'll be honest, and you can move on. Breaking up with her because she MIGHT find the feelings for this other guy are more worth it are so categorical it'll likely ruin any relationship those ideas reach. If it's so important for you to conserve yourself that you need to break up with anyone that you think can hurt you, then you prematurely and pre-emptively. It's not how I would want to treat my girlfriend, but if you feel you are that more important than your girlfriend, which I wouldn't judge, then it makes more sense. However, it's not something that should be categorically imposed onto others. You're saying it's fact that it's over because you feel OP shouldn't try.
And this is sort of the jist of the problem. It's "either or" with you. Either you 'pretend it's normal and be a clown' or 'you get out and look out for yourself'. I object to that, since it isn't "either or", and any girlfriend should be worth the time of day to not dump them the moment things are at all problematic.
You have the same information as everyone else, which is nowhere near enough to make the absolute statements you're making.
You're projecting something.
You won't be able to make your point clear to him.
Notice how he chosed to ignore my previous post where i described what happened when I acted like that in a Relationship.
He is absolutely convinced that his way of doing things is the right way, and everyone who doesn't see this is naive.
You're wasting your time.
Yes, and do you know why?
Because I killed many relationships after that due being oversensitive when my GF's talked about other Boys. My Experience from being cheated on that one time led me to assume the absolute worst right away, just like you are right now, and honestly, I can't blame those Girls for not wanting to be with me with that behavior.
It's good to be cautious, but It does more harm than good to be extreme
She explicitly stated she hasn't lost feeling for OP (or hadn't at the time of the thread being made).
We can feel things for multiple people, that's perfectly normal.
We have countless examples of what the OP is going through where the partner will claim and claim and claim they didn't cheat only for it to eventually come out that they did and it usually comes out weeks/months later, after the person has decided to continue investing in the relationship, which makes the inevitable break up much harder.
And why do you object to someone looking out for themselves?
Why should the OP allow him to treated like a doormat?
This isn't just something you can work through. She has feelings for someone else, she'll want to explore those feelings. Just as you can't help who you have feelings for, you also have a strong and undeniable desire/urge to explore those feelings or they lead to bitterness and resentment.
Why ignore this crucially important aspect in favour of telling the OP he should work through a relationship that's over?
That's exactly what generalization is. That's why it's an ugly way of making an assumption, and further ugly of presenting it as proof.
I explicitly state that I don't. It's just a poor way to treat a girlfriend.
Again, you're using your generalizations as foundation for your shit. He would be a doormat if she had cheated on him. it's not proven, but it is your axiom that it has. That's what I'm arguing against. Are you really unable to see that, because I've said that to you at least ten times, now.
Holy shit, you're just piling assumption on top of assumption. Having feelings for does not mean you'd act on them. Again, check the OP. You're purposefully being thick. You're basically a troll at this point. It says right there that it doesn't change how she feels about OP. Feelings don't mean they'll end up cheating. You're shitty for assuming it is, then using that as your basis.
I had to take a deep breath, now. You're purposefully dodging all accusations coming your way, and hand-waving them with crap like this. I'm not ignoring anything crucial, but again, you're saying "here's a fact", that's really your opinion, then you're saying "WHY WOULDN'T YOU CONSIDER THAT FACT??" when it's far from a fact.
So you're position is basically until I see her being pounded by the guy, it's not cheating.
I suggested that I was having a hard time believing she hadn't been even slightly intimate with this guy and she completely turned it back on me and how disgusted she is.
I'm fucking done.
Why is it insulting?
I suggested that I was having a hard time believing she hadn't been even slightly intimate with this guy and she completely turned it back on me and how disgusted she is.
I'm fucking done.
Look up "reducto ad absurdum". I'm telling you you're making an assumption, and that presenting that as proof is wrong. You cannot know if she's cheated, so stop thinking you can.
Thats a guilty reaction to do that. Mock outrage. You touched a nerve and just gave herself away.
When you lay your cards on the table, the person across from you has to make a play. If she didn't think it was worth bothering the OP over she should have kept it to herself and reconciled those feelings.
In our society, voicing a thing gives it rank and import. If you voice literally every honest thought you have to the people around you, chances are you won't have many friends. We're imperfect by nature, prone to jealous and callous thoughts, but it's how we parse and filter these things that shows control and character.
Thats a guilty reaction to do that. Mock outrage. You touched a nerve and just gave herself away.
I suggested that I was having a hard time believing she hadn't been even slightly intimate with this guy and she completely turned it back on me and how disgusted she is.
I'm fucking done.
She'll be where I'm living for a month and a half in September and we'll be seeing a lot of each other likely. I'll probably be living in her city next year too, I don't know whether it changes a whole lot.
If I was accused of cheating without having done it, I'd be pissed off too.
I'm not sticking my head in the sand and pretending her actions and responses to generally innocent questions don't mean what they clearly do.
Some people are so blinded by their desire to see the OP work on his relationship and give his partner the benefit of the doubt, they are happy to see him treated like a doormat/clown.
So you're position is basically until I see her being pounded by the guy, it's not cheating.
It doesn't matter that we have countless examples of how this situation plays out, you refuse to accept the likelihood of her having cheated because you don't have undeniable proof of the act.
Ridiculous.
And now you'll undoubtedly throw out some BS argument about how do you try a criminal without incontrovertible evidence and that the same should apply to this relationship.
Even after you just confessed you have feelings for someone else?
It's not an expected question in that situation?
It's not the question, it is the 'not believing' I think.
Even then, why would anyone be disgusted that they aren't believed?
If those feelings weren't serious, why would she tell the OP and then continue to tell him it's not serious, it's more an acquaintance.
This is someone she had a crush on previously and now she likely has the opportunity to act on those feelings.
How can some people not see the bullshit?
Jesus Christ.