• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Neill Blomkamp: I have "every intention" to make District 10

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't understand this obsession of following the number in the movie title. "District 10" sounds dumb and they'll just come up with a stupid reason to justify it.

There's no shame on naming the movie District 9 Part 2.

Dude. That sounds way more dumb.
 
If the Aliens sequel is a balls-out action flick it could be great. Not so hopeful if it is anything other than that.

Loved D9, and while Elysium made me wonder WTF he was thinking, the action was miles better than your standard Hollywood fare.
 
The guy is a talented director that needs to step away from the keyboard.

I don't even think he's terrible at script writing overall, more like he needs some moderating influences and someone to tighten them up in a few places.

The ideal case would be that he films an adaptation of some kind of SF novel where all the big ideas have been done for him, because his mastery of SF action is great, and it would be nice to see some actual cutting edge SF done by him. Not to mention him doing films where there isn't a message giving the audience blunt-force-truama injuries.
 
"Hollywood" cares mostly about two things.

1. Did the shoot come in on schedule and budget?

2. Did the movie make a profit?

This explains the careers, budgets, and choice of projects from Brett Ratner and Paul Anderson.

Blomkamp has yet to lose money.

Alien is a much bigger IP for Fox, than Chappie for Sony. A 50 mil budget is one thing, atleast 120 mil another. Mind you, I think Blomkamp will direct Alien. Its simply to late. But Fox will be more cautious, thats for sure.
 
Please dont. He'll just fuck it up :(

It'll be his S. Darko.

I hated Donnie Darko as well, but critics and people seemed to like it.
 
I wasn't even that big of a fan of District 9, but at least it was world class in comparison to Elysium and Chappie. I always found the first half of District 9 to be infinitely superior to its latter half, when it turned into a mindless action film. I used to think it would have been a better film had he maintained the social allegory of its first half, but having seen Elysium and Chappie, I'm not so sure that's the case anymore.
 
Alien is a much bigger IP for Fox, than Chappie for Sony. A 50 mil budget is one thing, atleast 120 mil another. Mind you, I think Blomkamp will direct Alien. Its simply to late. But Fox will be more cautious, thats for sure.

How is it "too late"? I doubt Fox has sunk a single penny into the production yet. Hell, I doubt they're even done with the first draft of the script.
 
I don't even think he's terrible at script writing overall, more like he needs some moderating influences and someone to tighten them up in a few places.

The ideal case would be that he films an adaptation of some kind of SF novel where all the big ideas have been done for him, because his mastery of SF action is great, and it would be nice to see some actual cutting edge SF done by him. Not to mention him doing films where there isn't a message giving the audience blunt-force-truama injuries.

Naw bruh, he's a terrible writer from top to bottom. His characters and their motivations are simplistic crap. His dialog is horse shit. He relies on hamfisting social commentary and underlying allegories into his films, and he's about as subtle as a punch to the face. His narratives are a disjointed mess. Honestly, from a writing standpoint, he's legitimately bad.
 
District 9 was incredible
Elysim was enjoyable
Chappie is ???(probably not the best)

I don't understand, one middling movie and out with Blomkamp? Do you people not like sci-fi movies? Because who else is really trying in this day and age?
 
District 9 was incredible
Elysim was enjoyable
Chappie is ???(probably not the best)

I don't understand, one middling movie and out with Blomkamp? Do you people not like sci-fi movies? Because who else is really trying in this day and age?

Everyone? It's not the mid 2000s anymore, the cycle has come full circle and Science Fiction isn't a criminally ignored genre anymore. If he were in the business of making Space Operas (or good Science Fiction films, which are definitely still a rarity), then you'd have a point - but your standard action/set piece heavy Sci Fi film? There's plenty of it out there.
 
Everyone? It's not the mid 2000s anymore, the cycle has come full circle and Science Fiction isn't a criminally ignored genre anymore. If he were in the business of making Space Operas (or good Science Fiction films, which are definitely still a rarity), then you'd have a point - but your standard action/set piece heavy Sci Fi film? There's plenty of it out there.

But very little in the vain of district 9. Yeah, I guess if we're painting scifi with a very wide brush but there's clearly a subset that Blomkamp works within that isn't getting much if any love.
 
District 9 was incredible
Elysim was enjoyable
Chappie is ???(probably not the best)

I don't understand, one middling movie and out with Blomkamp? Do you people not like sci-fi movies? Because who else is really trying in this day and age?

Danny Boyle, James Cameron, Christopher Nolan, Duncan Jones, Rian Johnson, Matt Reeves... some do. Many better.
 
It ended on a large cliffhanger so I don't see this.

I don't think it needs a sequel but that statement isn't true as it ended with many possibilities for a sequel and if I recall a cliffhanger.

That statement belongs to films like say Sixth Sense, Shutter Island, etc..

The ending was thought provoking, and I think would be greatly diminished by an answer to the Yes/No question posed. I saw the movie with a bunch of people who left the theater upset saying "Aw man! They're gonna make you wait until the sequel to find out what happens!" which misses the entire point of the ending.

The hint that the ending provides should be enough for most audiences, my dumbass friends excluded, I guess. It'd be like "Where's the Inception sequel? I need closure.".

I guess I'd be okay with a non-direct sequel that had nothing to do with Wilkus, but I don't think that's what they seem to be implying here. I just think anyone still looking for closure in District 9's ending is missing the point.
 
why district 10? there wasn't a district 8 unless he's gonna film that as his prequel to district 9 after district 10.
joEiXv9.gif


Maybe because the camp that was erected for the aliens in the first place was named district 9? And maybe because all movie long they were trying to move the aliens to a new camp? And maybe because at the end of the movie they said they sucessfully moved all the aliens to a new camp called district 10?

I mean, that's just my uneducated opinion. I wasn't paying any attention during the movie
 
Is it wrong that now I'm singing "whooooooooooa oooooooooooh here he comes! Watch out Alien he'll chew you up! Whooooooooooooooooa oooooooh here Neil comes! He's the franchise eater!"
 
It's the trajectory that's worrying. And Elysium is waay too high at 68%


I may be wrong here, but I think films that come from acclaimed directors get an initial rush of "Oh, well this isn't as good." that would not occur in the fourth or fifth failed movie.

It's like a buffer film. They walk into the theater thinking "This ought to be good." and feel a need to apologize to the director for having to review the shit film poorly. The good reviews are from people without the spine to say the film is poor
 
Maybe because the camp that was erected for the aliens in the first place was named district 9? And maybe because all movie long they were trying to move the aliens to a new camp? And maybe because at the end of the movie they said they sucessfully moved all the aliens to a new camp called district 10?

I mean, that's just my uneducated opinion. I wasn't paying any attention during the movie

Oh ok, guess I haven't been paying attention to the movie either.
 
I mean, District 9 couldn't even keep it's shit together for it's own runtime. The final act is embarrassing. Not sure why going back to that well would fix anything.

Why not just let someone else write your scritpts, cuz your are a very talented visual storyteller.
 
Please no. District 9 ist excellent and has a perfect ending for the story. District 10 will ruin it, since it never can be as good as D9 (regarding how Elysium and Chappie compares to it)
 
I don't even think he's terrible at script writing overall, more like he needs some moderating influences and someone to tighten them up in a few places.

The ideal case would be that he films an adaptation of some kind of SF novel where all the big ideas have been done for him, because his mastery of SF action is great, and it would be nice to see some actual cutting edge SF done by him. Not to mention him doing films where there isn't a message giving the audience blunt-force-truama injuries.

I will say this. After seeing Elysium, it strongly impressed me that from a purely visual standpoint, I'd actually like to see him take a shot at filming Iain M. Banks' Consider Phlebas. Paired with a good screenwriter to adapt the details well, and a sensible producer to keep things on track.
 
I re-watched District 9 a couple days ago and I thought they could probably do a sequel to it, maybe have the ship come back with reinforcements or something? Or set it after they had come back to the planet and conquered it, now the humans live in District 10?

I'm not sure, but there are a ton of ways to go with a sequel.

They ended District 9 with the words,
"4 years, I'll be back! (5?)"

I waited that long, saw no film.
I became worried.

It's a story that needs a proper finish. I felt like D9 was only part one of the story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom