brandonh83
Banned
They're whatever. Par for the course. It's about all you can expect really.
I just saw an article about that yesterday asking Kinberg about it and he had no idea where that was from until they pointed out that it came from the movie website. He said that the website people just do whatever they want and have no input from the actual writers. So it's probably not true.So tell me if this is true or not. Friend told me that Mr. Fantastic doesn't actually stretch in this movie, but his power is bending space time around him, so it just looks like he's stretching
HitFix spoke to Simon Kinberg, who says this all comes down to an effort to come up with a slightly different bit of pseudo-science to explain the character’s stretchy form.
The intent was to try to explain the power with some sort of scientific explanation, but as you pointed out, most of his powers defy what we know about physics. The upshot of it is that he stretches in his movie. That is his power. That’s the simplest explanation.
Kinberg claims he doesn’t even know exactly where the description came from, saying “There are so many materials on movies like this, and not all of it comes from the same source.”
Discussing the fact that we’ve already seen Richards stretching in footage from the film, which should have rendered most of this dust-up moot, the producer says,
And there will be more as more materials come out, certainly. I would say that it is among the harder visual effects to render in a way that feels real and visceral and physical, like we want the powers to feel. But, yeah. He stretches. That’s what he does.
Putting the best comic book movie from last year on there isn't a bad idea.
I think this movie will be the first time I cheer for the bad guys.
Well they did curiously omit Doom from the posters...
![]()
Saw this edit a while back adjusting the eyebrows a bit to be more comic accurate.
![]()
![]()
I wonder why...
![]()
![]()
If this franchise makes it that far, what would they call a potential 4th Fantastic Four movie?
Reed doesn't look like a scientist at all.
Gotta add that signature scientist glasses to identify him as such.Reed doesn't look like a scientist at all.
FANT 4 STIC
Really dislike how Mr. Fantastic looks...I mean, I just don't get "Mr. Fantastic" out of that at all. I guess it's difficult to show off his power without looking weird when freeze-framed, but still...
![]()
Saw this edit a while back adjusting the eyebrows a bit to be more comic accurate.
![]()
![]()
I wonder why...
![]()
![]()
Looks likeIf true, do you have a better design?his suit melted on to his skin. At least that's what it looks like
Thing doesn't look too bad but they picked the worst franchise to be embarrassed about being based on comics.
Yes, several.
![]()
![]()
![]()
You know- the design that reflects him as a brilliant genius and powerful dictator, not a melted GI Joe action figure.
That's the problem, that origin isn't Doom's real origin.When you're making a film, do you have the character look like that immediately after exposure to cosmic rays or towards the end of the movie or next one when they've figured themselves out?
Legendary fig is still the best exampleYou know- the design that reflects him as a brilliant and devious genius and powerful dictator, not a melted GI Joe action figure.
That's the problem, that origin isn't Doom's real origin.
Here's the thing about that- we have repeatedly done the song and dance now, in basically every failed hero franchise. Like Green Lantern. They did that the first time around too and while this is a reboot, it's just getting old to constantly have the first film "set up" future ones, especially with no guarantee that there won't be another reboot in a few years if the reboot itself flops.When you're making a film, do you have the character look like that immediately after exposure to cosmic rays or towards the end of the movie or next one when they've figured themselves out?
Am I supposed that this Reed is scientist supreme and the smartest guy in earth?
Hm...No? Why would you ever think that of reed richards?Am I supposed that this Reed is scientist supreme and the smartest guy in earth?
Here's the thing about that- we have repeatedly done the song and dance now, in basically every failed hero franchise. Like Green Lantern. They did that the first time around too and while this is a reboot, it's just getting old to constantly have the first film "set up" future ones, especially with no guarantee that there won't be another reboot in a few years if the reboot itself flops.
Why can't we have a movie that is already in progress, and has these characters somewhat established? Why do we need another retelling of Doom as something other than what he is? Maybe the whole computer hacker or blogger thing was just a ruse, but if it isn't, it's a ridiculous and pointless change to one of the best villains in Marvel.
Hm...No? Why would you ever think that of reed richards?
![]()
You mean those benefits that the guy going around in a levitating car for 60+ years never shared?This is about benefits to mankind not about 'accidentally' creating a bunch of killer robots.
Fair point. I'm going to assume that Hollywood assumes that the better story (easier?) for a first movie or reboot is one where you see the formation of a character until a certain point in time. They seem to prefer the challenge of showing the origin vs. presenting a character 5 years into his/her reign and getting you to buy in on whatever journey they happen to tell you for 2 hours.