• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

New Ghost Recon AW PC Screens with Minimum Specs Requirement

Borys said:
You're one annoying prick lately.



thoa048.jpg
 
truffleshuffle83 said:
:lol :lol these look better than the 360 shots borys

dont stop believing

hold on to that feeeeeiilin

I never said they do. Find it and quote me.

don't stop trolling

11 trolls on the first page and already 2 on the second one. You're quite good at it!

13 trolls in a thread about a PC version of a game and you don't give two shits about PC games.

Impressive!
 
tahrikmili said:
This man is full of wisdom!

I won't EVER EVER EVER touch the XBOX version with even a 6' pole. Ghost Recon 1 owned. The PC version plays like GR1 and for that, I'm glad.

I hope you're right. Ubi Soft has butchered the Tom Clancy games with their transition to consoles.
 
This thread is gonna cause more civilian collateral damage than the US military services if you all don't calm the fuck down. [/hint]
 
oh cmon borys i play pc games as well. but the comments were aimed directly at lukkas
and there has only been three replies that were comparing 360 to pc

and yesterday i really just read the thread title and ran to the marketplace. sorry for the confusion in that thread
 
I don't get the arguement, even Ubi agrees 360 = definitive version

"During the presentation it was once again re-iterated that the PC version of the game would be more focused on tactics as it better suited the platform, but with their strategy of only presenting a majority of Xbox360 gameplay and CGI, Ubisoft made it clear which version they considered as the definitive Advanced Warfighter."
 
Borys said:
I never said they do. Find it and quote me.

don't stop trolling

11 trolls on the first page and already 2 on the second one. You're quite good at it!

13 trolls in a thread about a PC version of a game and you don't give two shits about PC games.

Impressive!




:lol

Man, stop making lame attempts to get people banned with your name calling. You seem a little too worked up over some ugly game screens.
 
truffleshuffle83 said:
oh cmon borys i play pc games as well. but the comments were aimed directly at lukkas
and there has only been three replies that were comparing 360 to pc

and yesterday i really just read the thread title and ran to the marketplace. sorry for the confusion in that thread

...

Truce.
 
Who cares if the graphics look poorer compared to the 360, the gameplay will be 10x more immersive if it's anything like GR1. *shrug*
 
OK, I re-read this thread once more:

- Lukkas is a retard
- I'm a dick
- truffleshuffle83 is a cool guy after all

My sincerest apologies ts83, I'm too paranoid when it comes to PC threads on GAF and I pretty much attack every one who mentions the word "Xbox" in them.

This is the last time I acted like I acted, I swear.
 
So will the Ageia Phys X Chip make the game look different, or will it just make the game run faster?
 
pj325is said:
So will the Ageia Phys X Chip make the game look different, or will it just make the game run faster?

I doubt the game will "look" much different. You might see more particles and objects flying around after explosions.

Oh, I guess I'm in the minority....I love the new screens. Glad to hear that UBI is going back to its GR1 roots. Tatctical map FTW.
 
think both versions are using the same basic assets, major difference is the PC game seems to have dropped most of post-prossing effects that the 360 excels at.
 
DSN2K said:
credit to Ubi for attempting to make the game better suited for each platform.

How are worse graphics suited to the PC platform, and dumbed-down gameplay suited to the Xbox 360 platform?
 
Chairman Yang said:
How are worse graphics suited to the PC platform, and dumbed-down gameplay suited to the Xbox 360 platform?

Xbox 360 >> average gamer PC today.

I would like to see a 6800 take on GRAW 360... direct port would not scale well at all, remember this game needs to run somewhat well on a 2+ year old PC. What you are seeing in the 360 version is closed platform pushing its strengths, on the other hand a PC game designed to meet the required level of todays PC's.

and on the gameplay front a gamepad limits input, meaning the controls(what are directly linked to the gameplay, specially in a tactical shooter) are "dumbed-down" like you put it.
 
DSN2K said:
Xbox 360 >> average gamer PC today.

I would like to see a 6800 take on GRAW 360... direct port would not scale well at all, remember this game needs to run somewhat well on a 2+ year old PC. What you are seeing in the 360 version is closed platform pushing its strengths, on the other hand a PC game designed to meet the required level of todays PC's.

and on the gameplay front a gamepad limits input, meaning the controls(what are directly linked to the gameplay, specially in a tactical shooter) are "dumbed-down" like you put it.

Plenty of PC games are scaleable, though--while the Xbox 360 is definitely more powerful than the average PC, it would have been better if Ubi allowed both average and monster PCs to run the game, with the latter platform having 360-level graphics.

And I'm not remotely convinced that a gamepad disallows complex, tactical gameplay. For example, why would the advanced ballistics be in the PC version but not in the 360 version? I know why Ubisoft did it (they think console gamers aren't as interested in complexity) but I think they're dead wrong.
 
Top Bottom