Foil said:
truffleshuffle83 said::lol :lol these look better than the 360 shots borys
dont stop believing
hold on to that feeeeeiilin
tahrikmili said:This man is full of wisdom!
I won't EVER EVER EVER touch the XBOX version with even a 6' pole. Ghost Recon 1 owned. The PC version plays like GR1 and for that, I'm glad.
Borys said:I never said they do. Find it and quote me.
don't stop trolling
11 trolls on the first page and already 2 on the second one. You're quite good at it!
13 trolls in a thread about a PC version of a game and you don't give two shits about PC games.
Impressive!
truffleshuffle83 said:oh cmon borys i play pc games as well. but the comments were aimed directly at lukkas
and there has only been three replies that were comparing 360 to pc
and yesterday i really just read the thread title and ran to the marketplace. sorry for the confusion in that thread
Borys said:...
Truce.
best post in this thread.DSN2K said:credit to Ubi for attempting to make the game better suited for each platform.
pj325is said:So will the Ageia Phys X Chip make the game look different, or will it just make the game run faster?
DSN2K said:credit to Ubi for attempting to make the game better suited for each platform.
Chairman Yang said:How are worse graphics suited to the PC platform, and dumbed-down gameplay suited to the Xbox 360 platform?
DSN2K said:Xbox 360 >> average gamer PC today.
I would like to see a 6800 take on GRAW 360... direct port would not scale well at all, remember this game needs to run somewhat well on a 2+ year old PC. What you are seeing in the 360 version is closed platform pushing its strengths, on the other hand a PC game designed to meet the required level of todays PC's.
and on the gameplay front a gamepad limits input, meaning the controls(what are directly linked to the gameplay, specially in a tactical shooter) are "dumbed-down" like you put it.