• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

New Horizons will flyby Pluto on July 14th

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kup

Member
Huge moment and I'm excited to see how this unfolds. Just imagining how far away Pluto is and the fact that we're so close to seeing it properly is just incredible.
 
There's two Pluto threads going, figured I'd post this here, too.

http://www.nasa.gov/feature/pluto-and-its-moon-charon-now-in-color

UfgoKqs.jpg


7Lflrjp.jpg
 

Cub3h

Banned
I can't wait for this, I remember NH launching and thinking 2015 was SO far away, I think there is / used to be a twitter account that would give occasional updates on how far NH had gotten that always fascinated me.

Next up, Europa!
 

diaspora

Member
Is the plan for New Horizons to just keep going or would they use a gravity slingshot to fire it back when it's done with Pluto?
 

GK86

Homeland Security Fail
Is the plan for New Horizons to just keep going or would they use a gravity slingshot to fire it back when it's done with Pluto?

Once it explores Pluto and it's moons, it will head towards the Kuiper belt. They have three objects in mind that they want to get a better look at. I don't know the names of those Kuiper belt objects off the top of my head.
 

Bear

Member
Does anyone know how close it will get at the nearest point? I hope we can finally get a reasonably clear view of the surface.
 
Does anyone know how close it will get at the nearest point? I hope we can finally get a reasonably clear view of the surface.

You're going to be happy then.

This is what you can expect when everything's going to plan. But beaming all this data back to Earth will take many months.

When New Horizons flies by Pluto on 14 July, Ralph will deliver colour images that show surface features as small as a few km across.
 

luso

Member
Does anyone know how close it will get at the nearest point? I hope we can finally get a reasonably clear view of the surface.

Wikipedia is your friend, 12,500 km. Pretty close!

Launched in 2006, and using tech older than that specific year. So we depend on stuff done 10+ ago.
 

Bear

Member
You're going to be happy then.

Wikipedia is your friend, 12,500 km. Pretty close!

Launched in 2006, and using tech older than that specific year. So we depend on stuff done 10+ ago.

Wow, that's awesome. I didn't realize we were going to get such close footage of Pluto so soon.

Those stand-in images are really enticing, I can't wait to get a look at the actual photos once they are available.
 

Future

Member
Ridiculous how that we can still communicate with that thing. How isn't all our money not going into just probing space constantly. Every year instead of a stupid iPhone conference I should be seeing the latest and greatest in space tech and what's flying out this year
 

Kysen

Member
Mind boggling how far they have traveled and just how big the solar system is. The Suns gravity must be something else to hold objects that far away.
 

Space Monster

Neo Member
Man, it would be cool if we could park a probe at the barycenter of the system. The probe would stay stationary, and Pluto and Charon would rotate around it. o_O
 
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/new-fro...ety-on-plutos-close-approach-hemisphere-and-a

In a long series of images obtained by New Horizons’ telescopic Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) May 29-June 19, Pluto and its largest moon, Charon, appear to more than double in size. From this rapidly improving imagery, scientists on the New Horizons team have found that the “close approach hemisphere” on Pluto that New Horizons will fly over has the greatest variety of terrain types seen on the planet so far. They have also discovered that Charon has a “dark pole” – a mysterious dark region that forms a kind of anti-polar cap.

"This system is just amazing," said Alan Stern, New Horizons Principal Investigator, from the Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado. "The science team is just ecstatic with what we see on Pluto’s close approach hemisphere: Every terrain type we see on the planet—including both the brightest and darkest surface areas —are represented there, it’s a wonderland!

"And about Charon—wow—I don’t think anyone expected Charon to reveal a mystery like dark terrains at its pole," he continued. "Who ordered that?"

New Horizons scientists use a technique called deconvolution to sharpen the raw, unprocessed pictures that the spacecraft beams back to Earth; the contrast in these latest images has also been stretched to bring out additional details. Deconvolution can occasionally produce artifacts, so the team will be carefully reviewing newer images taken from closer range to determine whether some of the tantalizing details seen in these images persist. Pluto’s non-spherical appearance in these images is not real; it results from a combination of the image-processing technique and Pluto’s large variations in surface brightness.

"The unambiguous detection of bright and dark terrain units on both Pluto and Charon indicates a wide range of diverse landscapes across the pair," said science team co-investigator and imaging lead Jeff Moore, of NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, California. “For example, the bright fringe we see on Pluto may represent frost deposited from an evaporating polar cap, which is now in summer sun.”

kV7t2FDh.jpg

1vLX96Wh.jpg
 

Higgy

Member
Sorry for this question, it's probably dumb. So if we point Hubble at Pluto what would we see? I always assumed that since Hubble can see deep into the universe that it could be used to examine something like Pluto.
 

Log4Girlz

Member
Sorry for this question, it's probably dumb. So if we point Hubble at Pluto what would we see? I always assumed that since Hubble can see deep into the universe that it could be used to examine something like Pluto.

I wish there was a way to search the internet to find the answer.


Seriously all it sees is an unresolved blob.
 

Xe4

Banned
Sorry for this question, it's probably dumb. So if we point Hubble at Pluto what would we see? I always assumed that since Hubble can see deep into the universe that it could be used to examine something like Pluto.


It used to be the highest resolution photo of pluto, until New Horizons a this month, I think.
 

Higgy

Member
I wish there was a way to search the internet to find the answer.


Seriously all it sees is an unresolved blob.

Or just ask about it a thread about Pluto from people who are passionate about it. Much more interesting.

Anyway thanks for the pic.
 

RiverBed

Banned
Why does the video state 2015 for when pluto is visited? Didn't either of the Voyagers visit it?

Also, I am sad that the years between the planets visited were relatively short, but then it takes a huge leap till Pluto's visit. As an Astrophysics nut, I would love to see space exploration be in the main stream media and a constant global focus/push.

Anyways, I think I'll shed tears of joy when I see the first clear images of Pluto. I feel like being on a ship exploring brave new worlds and my eyes would be among the first to ever witness them- and I am and we all will be. Such feats don't happen every day. I'll be telling the story of where I was when this happened in the far future- just like with every space milestone that happened in my lifetime.
What a time to be alive. :)
 
Why does the video state 2015 for when pluto is visited? Didn't either of the Voyagers visit it?

Voyager 1 could have but they didn't.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Voyager_1

Because Pioneer 11 had one year earlier detected a thick, gaseous atmosphere over Titan, the Voyager space probes' controllers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory elected for Voyager 1 to make a close approach of Titan. Its trajectory with a close flyby of Titan caused a gravitational deflection that sent Voyager 1 onto a trajectory that took it below the south pole of Saturn and out of the plane of the ecliptic, thus ending its planetary science mission. Voyager 1 could have been directed to visit Uranus and Neptune (later accomplished by Voyager 2). Also, Voyager 1 could have been commanded onto a different trajectory, whereby the gravitational slingshot effect of Saturn's mass would have steered and boosted it out to a flyby of Pluto. However, this Plutonian option was not exercised, because the close flyby of Titan was determined to have more scientific value and less risk

Voyager 2 went by Uranus and Neptune. There was no way it could get to Pluto, so they put it on a trajectory that could flyby both Neptune and it's moon Triton before it went out of the system.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Voyager_2

Because this was the last planet of the Solar System that Voyager 2 could visit, the Chief Project Scientist, his staff members, and the flight controllers decided to also perform a close fly-by of Triton, the larger of Neptune's two originally known moons, so as to gather as much information on Neptune and Triton as possible, regardless of Voyager 2's departure angle from the planet. This was just like the case of Voyager 1's encounters with Saturn and its massive moon Titan.

EDIT:
Sorry for this question, it's probably dumb. So if we point Hubble at Pluto what would we see? I always assumed that since Hubble can see deep into the universe that it could be used to examine something like Pluto.

Someone covered you on the image but if you want the "why" then read this.

http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2013/02141014-hubble-galaxy-pluto.html
 
Sorry for this question, it's probably dumb. So if we point Hubble at Pluto what would we see? I always assumed that since Hubble can see deep into the universe that it could be used to examine something like Pluto.
Maybe Pluto moves too fast for Hubble to get a clear image?

All of Hubble's deep space pictures are of relatively stationary objects, perhaps Hubble looking at Pluto is like trying to track a fly with binoculars?
 

Log4Girlz

Member
Maybe Pluto moves too fast for Hubble to get a clear image?

All of Hubble's deep space pictures are of relatively stationary objects, perhaps Hubble looking at Pluto is like trying to track a fly with binoculars?

No, it's simply too small of an object at that distance. Our moon is significantly larger than it and pluto is at the outer reaches of the solar system. That's why with the exception of like a handful of stars, no telescope, not even Hubble can resolve stars as anything but points of light.
 
Maybe Pluto moves too fast for Hubble to get a clear image?

All of Hubble's deep space pictures are of relatively stationary objects, perhaps Hubble looking at Pluto is like trying to track a fly with binoculars?

No, it has to do with scale. Like if the Pillars of Creation are 100K times as far from Earth as Pluto is, but it's 100MM times larger than Pluto, then we're going to be able to get a picture 1000 times clearer. Those aren't the right numbers, but you get the idea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom