GET OUT OF HERE!
Well SORRY, I don't get to play many games. I'm sorry if that's the only console RPG I've been able to play and able to base an opinion on.
Stupid dick
GET OUT OF HERE!
Well SORRY, I don't get to play many games. I'm sorry if that's the only console RPG I've been able to play and able to base an opinion on.
Stupid dick
Seriously?Stupid dick
Do you have a PC? The Witcher games are 66% off on Steam at the moment (though not on GOG, oddly enough). Even if you won't have time to play them in the near future, they're unlikely to get much cheaper.
I really hope I get to play this. If it's like final fantasy x and is open world with lots of side quests and stuff I bet I'll love it. Or do I wait for final fantasy xv?
I really hope I get to play this. If it's like final fantasy x and is open world with lots of side quests and stuff I bet I'll love it. Or do I wait for final fantasy xv?
Great video by gamermd83 @ YouTube about TW3. She talks about what she saw during the presentation and mentions few things that I think were not covered by the press yet (such as that they're hard at work to improve facial expressions).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCija78ls4I
Well if it's 80 significantly different monsters, then that really is a large number of enemies.
Also that quest sounds cool but not unlike most western RPG quests these days.
To be fair The Witcher saga is pretty much an exception in this sense; most of the RPGs I can think of usually have a way to do the quest "right" and few options to screw it up to various degrees.Yup, seems like every quest in a western RPG you try to do the "proper" way usually ends in making shit worse. Witcher 2 it was surprising when you were successful with a quest and you DIDN'T get backstabbed.
Yup, seems like every quest in a western RPG you try to do the "proper" way usually ends in making shit worse. Witcher 2 it was surprising when you were successful with a quest and you DIDN'T get backstabbed.
Keza McDonald from IGN said the game doesn't have quest markers right now, hopefully CDPR will keep it that way.
THIS JUST IN. BREAKING! The mermaid seen in the trailer wasn't actually a mermaid. Also, Vernon Roche will be back!
Source
THIS JUST IN. BREAKING! The mermaid seen in the trailer wasn't actually a mermaid. Also, Vernon Roche will be back!
Source
THIS JUST IN. BREAKING! The mermaid seen in the trailer wasn't actually a mermaid. Also, Vernon Roche will be back!
Source
I think it's pretty much guaranteed that any numbers spewed out by Witcher's 3 PR at the moment are overly inflated numbers. This is the same PR saying there are 36 different endings which actually just means 36 different combinations of game states.
I can believe the game taking up to 100 hours to complete if you're one for secondary content (side-quests and the like); I got a good ~75 out of the original game.
I can believe the game taking up to 100 hours to complete if you're one for secondary content (side-quests and the like); I got a good ~75 out of the original game.
80 distinct monsters (that is, not just recolors) is HUGE.
Which is pretty much standard practice, anyway.I have 57 hours played on Witcher 1 but I think I played through it twice for the 2 different factions/endings. I'm not saying that the numbers are completely false, but they're just spinning the numbers by telling the theoretical maximum and biggest numbers they can get.
35 times The Witcher 2 and roughly 20% bigger than Skyrim, they claim.
I honestly find that estimation/comparison about the landscape size completely uninteresting because it doesn't tell us absolutely nothing useful about the quality of the game.
I'm glad the game is going to be big, but you could easily have a map that is 10x TW2 and still destroys for amount of content, detail, quality and variety one that is 100X.
Case in point: Skyrim had a very sizable landscape and hundreds of caves and dungeons and yet it didn't feel "bigger" than games like Ocarina of Time or Twilight Princess, because even "just" with ten dungeons for each one, those games offered a lot more unique and actually enjoyable stuff.
I have 57 hours played on Witcher 1 but I think I played through it twice for the 2 different factions/endings. I'm not saying that the numbers are completely false, but they're just spinning the numbers by telling the theoretical maximum and biggest numbers they can get.