• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

new Over G screens...sabotage continues

bloke

Member
Doesn't look too good afterall if this is final build.
Oh and 8 players max for online play.

overg10.jpg

overg18.jpg

overg24.jpg

overg25.jpg

overg32.jpg

overg38.jpg

overg26.jpg

overg27.jpg

overg37.jpg

overg49.jpg

overg55.jpg

overg62.jpg

overg14.jpg

overg51.jpg

overg33.jpg


rest here http://watch.impress.co.jp/game/docs/20060307/overg.htm
 
Damn, PC flight sims circa 2000 looked on par with this (bar the pixel-shaded water).

Japanese devs should really stick to jRPGs and mech titles :|
 
Borys said:
Damn, PC flight sims circa 2000 looked on par with this (bar the pixel-shaded water).

Japanese devs should really stick to jRPGs and mech titles :|

Well, not that there have been many more since then.. :lol

LOMAC looks better, certainly. So does the IL-2 FB stuff.
 
Mr_Moogle said:
Ace Combat shits on your face.

Never played it... can't look better than this, right?

But I played many jRPGs and they are all pretty much flawless - that's where my comment comes from, stick to what you are doing best.
 
This game looks great in the new trailers. But gaf loves the screenshots.

Also, this is not an arcadey game like AC, much more of a sim in the flight model.
 
Hyoushi said:
This game looks great in the new trailers. But gaf loves the screenshots.

Also, this is not an arcadey game like AC, much more of a sim in the flight model.


Please, this game deserves the laughs. Look at the pic with the plane over the three-shitty-houses-city :lol
 
Vaandaviii said:
Please, this game deserves the laughs. Look at the pic with the plane over the three-shitty-houses-city :lol
Yeah, well, I've seen other media in which the city shots look better. Oh well, no use arguing here I guess. Game has volumetric clouds, great volumetric particle smoke for the vortex contrails, nice shaders for water and whatnot, great self shadowing and STOVL in the JSF. I'm happy. The only thing that looks weird in the trailer is the rudder response after the carrier launches.
 
Hyoushi said:
This game looks great in the new trailers. But gaf loves the screenshots.

Also, this is not an arcadey game like AC, much more of a sim in the flight model.

Judging from the playables (at least a bunch of US fighters, correct?) this looks like a survey sim, and there have been better looking survey sims even on not-so-powerful PCs. I'm not dissing the game, mind you, just pointing out the obvious.

I wish they did a console versione of IL-2!
 
PolyGone said:
tombstone4lm.jpg


:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

You are showing fewer and fewer redeeming features, your trolling is getting tiresome, and I think the forum could do with a 1 month holiday from you.

Luckily I can do something about that...
 
Borys said:
Damn, PC flight sims circa 2000 looked on par with this (bar the pixel-shaded water).

Japanese devs should really stick to jRPGs and mech titles :|

Frighteningly ignorant?

Edit: They should stick with... PS3 and Revolution, which they actually give a shit about. Obviously MS isn't paying them quite well enough.
 
Hyoushi said:
No it doesn't. But thanks for the nice touched up screens. :)

yes it does! even without the high resolution / anti-aliasing, the actual PS2 graphics of AC5 takes a massive shit on Over G :)
 
Man, what's up with the Japanese devs and the Xbox 360? I realize that most of them probably don't take the console seriously, but wouldn't it be in their own interest to make impressive games regardless? Especially given the fact that this is likely to be the first next-gen appearance of a game in this particular genre.
 
Somethingblah Cock said:
Non-touched up AC5 shots:

ace-combat-5-the-unsung-war-20041025095621127.jpg


ace-combat-5-the-unsung-war-20041025095619955.jpg


ace-combat-5-the-unsung-war-20041021021455907.jpg


ace-combat-5-the-unsung-war-20041021021420580.jpg


If it had anti-aliasing, it would indeed blow Over G away.

You really have to see it in motion to appreciate it but that being said all AC PS2 games would benefit from 2X AA! But still its not jaggy.
 
I'd sacrifice graphic quality ANYTIME if it was because all the buildings and land object where truly there even when i'm flying very high but right now it's again JUST A FUCKIN CITY TEXTURE.
 
Wyzdom said:
I'd sacrifice graphic quality ANYTIME if it was because all the buildings and land object where truly there even when i'm flying very high but right now it's again JUST A FUCKIN CITY TEXTURE.

Yeah if it had the city landscape of GRAW I would like that.
 
U K Narayan said:
Give me a break, it isn't Microsoft's fault that 97% of the Japanese developers out there are completely lazy.

Don't they want their games to sell? :\
Apparently not their Xbox games....
 
PhatSaqs said:
Apparently not their Xbox games....
Then why make any games at all? Only the Japanese would do something so illogical. But I reckon it's rather obvious that this is mere sabotage.

(Sigh) What a waste.
 
Top Bottom