http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfEfvPrU8bMGuessWho said:can anybody upload it? I think they took it down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfEfvPrU8bMGuessWho said:can anybody upload it? I think they took it down.
Even worse the second time.Lebron said:
thx but i'm talking about the higher res one.Lebron said:
whoops, my bad.GuessWho said:thx but i'm talking about the higher res one.
Lebron said:
yeah, it was a bad quality link. My bad. Try the one I added above your postbob_arctor said:wtf is this shit??
I know. Massive facepalms were had.bob_arctor said:wtf is this shit??
He's not talking about the quality of the video.:lolLebron said:yeah, it was a bad quality link. My bad. Try the one I added above your post
Lebron said:yeah, it was a bad quality link. My bad
Heh, I kind of figured that's what you meant after I posted. No problem anyway. And yeah, I agree the kid part should have been cut out.bob_arctor said:Nah, it was fine and I thank you for the link--but that young Kirk shit is retarded. Amazingly retarded--like how the hell did anyone think that would be good? levels of incredulity.
This whole movie needs to be "cut out."Lebron said:Heh, I kind of figured that's what you meant after I posted. No problem anyway. And yeah, I agree the kid part should have been cut out.
Lebron said:Heh, I kind of figured that's what you meant after I posted. No problem anyway. And yeah, I agree the kid part should have been cut out.
isn't that the typical response to anything Star Trek related though? I kidMason said:because the only reaction is got was a few laughs and giggles when the words "Star Trek" came up at the end.
Cheebs said:BTW that isn't the only scene of kid kirk. He is raised by his uncle who is a drunk because his father died before he was born (He was on the USS Kelvin with Pike). So I am guessing there will be a scene with the drunk uncle since they cast the role.
Dax01 said:This whole movie needs to be "cut out."
What? This movie seems like a bunch of hormonal teenagers flying around in space, not about exploring it.Seth C said:No, just every part that doesn't directly involve flying in a spaceship, away missions, or fighting aliens. Which I have a feeling is most of this movie, considering what that video chose to focus on.
Dax01 said:What? This movie seems like a bunch of hormonal teenagers flying around in space, not about exploring it.
Oh, okay. Sorry about the misunderstanding.Seth C said:Sorry, that's what I meant. I will clean up that sentence, but suffice to say I think "most of the movie" is what needs to be cut, sadly.
radioheadrule83 said:I think it looks great. And my current feeling is that this is just what was needed.
This could bring the franchise back into mainstream popularity...
For every legacy fan that feels offended there are probably two or three people who abandoned the tv-show and the movies who are sitting there eyebrows raised and feel as though they want to see more.
Outcast2004 said:I like this response.
I'm somewhat a fan of Trek, but I agree it's time to go a different direction with it. I really like what I saw there.
If anything, it's going to be a feast for the eyes.
Cheebs said:Why do people still think actor's in their late 20's and early 30's are teenagers?
Did people call Zachary Quinto a teenager in Heroes? Karl Urban a teenager in Lord of the Rings?...etc
Because they sometimes play high school students, and the people bitching in this thread only see other human beings on screen, not counting their moms.Cheebs said:Why do people still think actor's in their late 20's and early 30's are teenagers?
It wasn't amazing in the least bit. If you like overly done, and have a lot of senseless action in it, then yeah, it guess it's "amazing."Fatalah said:I think people are getting hung up on the clean and colorful look of it. But that trailer was DAMN amazing. I feel like the franchise is getting rebooted like Batman was. AMAZING.
Dax01 said:It wasn't amazing in the least bit. If you like overly done, and have a lot of senseless action in it, then yeah, it guess it's "amazing."
Why do you keep posting in this thread? You are a cool guy but it seems all you do is this:Dax01 said:It wasn't amazing in the least bit. If you like overly done, and have a lot of senseless action in it, then yeah, it guess it's "amazing."
Cheebs said:Why do you keep posting in this thread?
Uncle said:Never give up, never surrender!
There are a good number of trekkies in here willing to give the film a chance, most of them. Dax is just being the loudest. Dax PLEASE if you can't stop just leave star trek threads alone. All you do is troll them now, it isn't at all offering any sort of discussion. Come on, man.Calcaneus said:So it seems that a lot of people who only had a passing interest in Star Trek are interested in this movie, and the Trekkies......are being Trekkies.
Dax01 said:It wasn't amazing in the least bit. If you like overly done, and have a lot of senseless action in it, then yeah, it guess it's "amazing."
Cheebs said:Also I gotta say I LOVED the giant monster shot. I can't wait to see what that scene is and the context of it. It gets so boring to have 99.9% of the aliens on Trek be humans with slightly different foreheads. A monster alien who wants to eat people, classic sci-fi stuff is really nice to see for once in Trek.
The movie still has Romulans (and going by all the Klingon extras on the imdb page) and Klingons, no worries.JayDubya said:You need a little bit of both, but don't be maligning the bumpy headed: Klingon-centric episodes and films didn't exactly skimp on the action.
Um, what? I only saw the trailer until the *last* page. What are you talking about? Oh, and that was the *only* post I quoted saying that he is wrong about it. Go look over the thread and see for yourself. Talk about a gross over-exaggeration.Cheebs said:Why do you keep posting in this thread? You are a cool guy but it seems all you do is this:
Someone: "Woah, that trailer was awesome."
Dax: "No it wasn't, it looked horrible. It will be a terrible movie."
Repeated about 50 times over the last few pages..
You say that like it's an insult.Ryck said:You didn't like the trailer
we get it
I know we are supposed to discuss these things but how many times do you really need to say it?
Go watch some Deep Space Nine or something...
I just meant there is plenty of ST as we knew it, around.Dax01 said:You say that like it's an insult.
Paramount knows every single Trekkie will be there no matter what, Dax's claim he'll go despite hating the movie more than anyone in this thread proves that lol. There is no need to market at people who like Trek, they'll be there day one even without a penny spent on marketing.JayDubya said:Put simply, that marketing wasn't for us.
JayDubya said:Put simply, that marketing wasn't for us.
Cheebs said:Paramount knows every single Trekkie will be there no matter what, Dax's claim he'll go despite hating the movie more than anyone in this thread proves that lol. There is no need to market at people who like Trek, they'll be there day one even without a penny spent on marketing.
Okay.Ryck said:I just meant there is plenty of ST as we knew it, around.
Yeah it's going in a completely different direction, that is harder for some than others I realize but I suggest at least giving it a shot.
I was the same way when I saw the direction the Bond franchise was going with Casino Royale, but I ended up enjoying it quite a bit in the end.
Besides like I said we have tons of shows and movies that are pre reboot.
Abrams has directed a decent amount of action, he has never been a quick cutter/shakey cam/etc type of guy.Stoney Mason said:Pretty much. I assume the real movie obviously won't be that frenetic which is the impression the trailer gives off.