Not to mention that the phantom cross check by Daniel could have easily been diving (unsportsmanlike) by Heatley instead. I'm sure Dan Boyle gave him a stern talking to on the bench.bardia said:Officiating was shit all game. There were missed high sticks by the canucks in the 1st right in front of the ref :lol, phantom cross check by sedin, 2 min minor for the eager hit (although it ended up working to our favor), etc. etc.
I laughed way too hard at this!Manics said:Manics has an itch to cross out the Sharks in the off season thread. Once Manics eliminates a team they never return.
No, he doesn't cry about stuff like that remember?Socreges said:Not to mention that the phantom cross check by Daniel could have easily been diving (unsportsmanlike) by Heatley instead. I'm sure Dan Boyle gave him a stern talking to on the bench.
Manics said:Manics has an itch to cross out the Sharks in the off season thread. Once Manics eliminates a team they never return.
Well that explains your wife's lack of self-esteem.Manics said:Manics has an itch to cross out the Sharks in the off season thread. Once Manics eliminates a team they never return.
Yes. Unless something happened to her nipples after midnight.Lone_Prodigy said:Seems like every media outlet wants to talk to the flasher. Kinda like looking for Cinderella, except instead of a glass slipper you have pierced nips. Wouldn't you like that job?
Socreges said:Yes. Unless something happened to her nipples after midnight.
Pretty outstanding rack. That little corner in Rogers Arena never ceases to entertain.
Good points otherwise - but we're pulling from two games here. And one was a freak blowout. Like you said, Sharks will bounce back. As for the PPs, Canucks have been really disciplined and haven't really gotten away with anything (besides the high stick on Thornton that was missed, not overlooked). It'll be on the Sharks to tighten their game.
JWong said:"BIEKSA-LLENT"
I think they're running out of ideas.
I think Sharks are playing like their scared to lose.bardia said:How many WCF games in a row have the Sharks lost now? I think they are going to come out with an extremely strong push tomorrow and the Canucks better be ready. Biggest problems I've seen with the Sharks is that they haven't been playing the full 60 minutes, but if they manage to I can see them giving the Nucks a hard time. If the Sharks lose tomorrow I don't see them coming back from 0-3 deficit.
The Sharks have lost 8 consecutive WCF games in a row by my count. The last time they won a WCF game was Game 4 of their 2004 series against the Flames. They also lost the first two games of that series on the road.bardia said:How many WCF games in a row have the Sharks lost now? I think they are going to come out with an extremely strong push tomorrow and the Canucks better be ready. Biggest problems I've seen with the Sharks is that they haven't been playing the full 60 minutes, but if they manage to I can see them giving the Nucks a hard time. If the Sharks lose tomorrow I don't see them coming back from 0-3 deficit.
8 in a row.bardia said:How many WCF games in a row have the Sharks lost now? I think they are going to come out with an extremely strong push tomorrow and the Canucks better be ready. Biggest problems I've seen with the Sharks is that they haven't been playing the full 60 minutes, but if they manage to I can see them giving the Nucks a hard time. If the Sharks lose tomorrow I don't see them coming back from 0-3 deficit.
Lone_Prodigy said:Either way, the series is far from over. Niemi will bounce back (hard to fault him for all of those 7 goals), San Jose is a tough arena to play in, and they should get more power plays.
SpectreFire said:Niemi wasn't bad at all during the game, but you have to think the complete lack of confidence he must have with the team in front of him.
.
6 fucking penalties in the 3rd. 6 of them. 12 minutes of PP time, it's no wonder they couldn't get shit going. It's a snowball effect, every time a penalty would end there would be another one. No opportunity to get going and I feel like it probably weighed on them a lot and took any wind they might have had out of their sails.Lone_Prodigy said:Sharks have two even-strength goals in the series. One was a gift by Luongo and one was by Eager in garbage time.
Canucks have 6 third-period goals in the series, the Sharks have 1.
Canucks scored 7 goals last night. In the first 3 games against Nashville they scored 5.
Seems like every media outlet wants to talk to the flasher. Kinda like looking for Cinderella, except instead of a glass slipper you have pierced nips. Wouldn't you like that job?
Power plays were 7-2 in favour of the Canucks. Sharks are a perfect 3-3 through two games. That's a cause for concern.
Either way, the series is far from over. Niemi will bounce back (hard to fault him for all of those 7 goals), San Jose is a tough arena to play in, and they should get more power plays.
bardia said:How many WCF games in a row have the Sharks lost now? I think they are going to come out with an extremely strong push tomorrow and the Canucks better be ready. Biggest problems I've seen with the Sharks is that they haven't been playing the full 60 minutes, but if they manage to I can see them giving the Nucks a hard time. If the Sharks lose tomorrow I don't see them coming back from 0-3 deficit.
CCF23 said:
SpectreFire said:Niemi wasn't bad at all during the game, but you have to think the complete lack of confidence he must have with the team in front of him.
I wouldn't be surprised if the reason he didn't shut his legs in time was because the man was absolutely baffled by the fact that he was facing a defenseman on a clean breakaway to his net.
I suspect the 5-2 score had more of an effect on them. At that point the PPOs were only 3-2 for the Canucks (thank you, Ben Eager). Sharks took three consecutive penalties after the game was basically out of hand.Acid08 said:6 fucking penalties in the 3rd. 6 of them. 12 minutes of PP time, it's no wonder they couldn't get shit going. It's a snowball effect, every time a penalty would end there would be another one. No opportunity to get going and I feel like it probably weighed on them a lot and took any wind they might have had out of their sails.
Revenant said:EDIT: Corey Crawford Resigned as well for the next 3 years at a 2.66 cap hit it seems.
http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=366247
Revenant said:EDIT: Corey Crawford Resigned as well for the next 3 years at a 2.66 cap hit it seems.
http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=366247
Acid08 said:I can't stress enough how huge Demers loss is for us. He is our quickest d-man, maybe slightly behind Boyle, and quickness is one thing we need this round. Nucks have us beat there no doubt but Demers brings a really fast and physical game and he's more than capable of helping out offensively. Get Huskins the fuck out of there, he isn't really a bad defender but he hasn't played in 3 months and is nothing special to begin with.
I know he had his problems when he played with you guys but he has been a really good pick up for the Sharks. I'm sure you haven't seen him play at all this year besides the last 2 games though.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:Everyone should call up the Tampa organization and demand they change their offensive name. People die from lightning strikes every year. Call up and use the c-word and the f-word, anything to scare and threaten them to change their name.
Bears are not a thread. Stephen is just jealous he doesn't have nearly as good of a talk show.JWong said:![]()
A threat to America's National Treasure, Stephen Colbert.
What a smart and classy lady.Lone_Prodigy said:
Revenant said:EDIT: Corey Crawford Resigned as well for the next 3 years at a 2.66 cap hit it seems.
http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=366247
TAMPA -- Boston Bruins forward Patrice Bergeron has been medically cleared to play, and barring a last-minute setback, will be in the lineup for Game 3 of the Eastern Conference finals against the Tampa Bay Lightning Thursday night at St. Pete Times Forum, according to two team sources.
Yay! Thrilled that they're likely going to keep the Seguin-Kelly-Ryder line intact in addition to bringing Bergeron back. Smart moves are being made.Julien also had announced Wednesday that rookie Tyler Seguin will remain in the lineup, which means someone else will have to sit.
Julien said he liked the Seguin-Chris Kelly-Michael Ryder line and that combination will likely stay intact for Game 3.
That means Rich Peverley could move to the team's fourth line with Gregory Campbell and Daniel Paille.
In that scenario, Shawn Thornton could be the healthy scratch.
Lone_Prodigy said:
CCF23 said:Pretty good contract for the Hawks if he can play like he did this year.
brucewaynegretzky said:Perfect contract! I'll give you Carter for it!
NiceUberTag said:Sources: Patrice Bergeron will play
Yay! Thrilled that they're likely going to keep the Seguin-Kelly-Ryder line intact in addition to bringing Bergeron back. Smart moves are being made.
Haha guy behind her taking video.Lone_Prodigy said:
It's sad that I don't even really think about Savard anymore, knowing that it'll take a miracle to see him again any time soon. With Bergeron back the team feels 100% healthy to me, and that's really a bummer. Remarkable that the Bruins managed to be one of the best offensive teams in the league without the guy just a testament to the depth of the roster.MacAttack said:Damn, I know its stupid to play the "what if..." game, but if Savard was healthy, what a fucking beastly set of forward lines the Bruins would have this post season.
Lucic - Savard - Horton
Marchand - Bergeron - Recchi
Seguin - Krejci - Ryder
Peverley - Kelly - Thorton/Campbell/Paille
Thanks again Matt Cooke, you monster.
Yeah, uh, you couldn't afford it. Peverley/Kelly would probably not be there.MacAttack said:Damn, I know its stupid to play the "what if..." game, but if Savard was healthy, what a fucking beastly set of forward lines the Bruins would have this post season.
Lucic - Savard - Horton
Marchand - Bergeron - Recchi
Seguin - Krejci - Ryder
Peverley - Kelly - Thorton/Campbell/Paille
Thanks again Matt Cooke, you monster.
Just looked and it seems like they'd be OK.Foreign Jackass said:Yeah, uh, you couldn't afford it. Peverley/Kelly would probably not be there.
It's nice, but I still miss a healthy Savard. Still hoping he can salvage his career.vatstep said:It's sad that I don't even really think about Savard anymore, knowing that it'll take a miracle to see him again any time soon. With Bergeron back the team feels 100% healthy to me, and that's really a bummer. Remarkable that the Bruins managed to be one of the best offensive teams in the league without the guy just a testament to the depth of the roster.
Foreign Jackass said:Yeah, uh, you couldn't afford it. Peverley/Kelly would probably not be there.
Hockey was getting pretty boring in the no-salary-cap years. All the good players were in Detroit and New York. I'm happy there's a salary cap even if Montreal would currently be in pretty good position without a salary cap.Sanjuro Tsubaki said:It's nice, but I still miss a healthy Savard. Still hoping he can salvage his career.
Speaking of the salary cap...just remove it. Would love to see these "beloved" southern teams stick around then.
For as much shit as Kaberle gets, look where are team is regardless. He played a pretty decent game three. I have a soft spot for the guy maybe, I think once he clears his head in the offseason and has a complete pre-season with the Bruins should set him straight.MacAttack said:Like I said, its a futile exercise to try and figure out what could have been.
For shits and giggles though, what if we hadn't made the Kaberle trade? I could live without that one.
I agree with you. I've just been on the anti-south binge pretty heavily lately. I'm the kind of person who wants the wheels to fall off asap than keep putting on spares and going forward.Foreign Jackass said:Hockey was getting pretty boring in the no-salary-cap years. All the good players were in Detroit and New York. I'm happy there's a salary cap even if Montreal would currently be in pretty good position without a salary cap.
I'm still scratching my head over that one. Everyone in Canada knew full well the Bruins got hosed in that deal as soon as it was announced. It's somewhat offset by what a steal we landed when dealing Kessel but I don't recall future considerations being included in that deal to take on the dead weight of the Maple Leaf at a later date.MacAttack said:Like I said, its a futile exercise to try and figure out what could have been.
For shits and giggles though, what if we hadn't made the Kaberle trade? I could live without that one.
You feel better when your season ends in a week. Sun Belt teams for life!Sanjuro Tsubaki said:For as much shit as Kaberle gets, look where are team is regardless. He played a pretty decent game three. I have a soft spot for the guy maybe, I think once he clears his head in the offseason and has a complete pre-season with the Bruins should set him straight.
I agree with you. I've just been on the anti-south binge pretty heavily lately. I'm the kind of person who wants the wheels to fall off asap than keep putting on spares and going forward.
At least I didn't use the four letter c-word and f-word to describe you!Rafa=FedKilla said:You feel better when your season ends in a week. Sun Belt teams for life!
I like to look at football to justify salary caps.Foreign Jackass said:Hockey was getting pretty boring in the no-salary-cap years. All the good players were in Detroit and New York. I'm happy there's a salary cap even if Montreal would currently be in pretty good position without a salary cap.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:For as much shit as Kaberle gets, look where are team is regardless. He played a pretty decent game three. I have a soft spot for the guy maybe, I think once he clears his head in the offseason and has a complete pre-season with the Bruins should set him straight.