schwabdizzle
Banned
I am saying we don't know the hard facts. Maybe he was provoked to send those pictures. Maybe the women are lying or trying to get revenge on this person. There are litterlly no facts besides hearsay.
What evidence do you want? It sounds like you want the women who he harassing to post their logs of him harassing them? The whole reason this is anonymous as it is, is because of the systematic targeting of female victims on the net. Notice everybody referring to the situation are talking on behalf of their friends.
Some dude was going around telling people the sky is blue, when in fact the sky is blue.This whole burn at the stake is ridiculous. Some dude probably sent some pictures to some females whom all may or may not have been gaming journalists and probably fired on them hard and now people are saying he was sexually harassing them. Maybe this dude is a sex addict like Tiger Woods. I just feel until the facts are out there, then this is hardly a story. Fuck, even Bill O'Reily didn't get this much attention.
I am saying we don't know the hard facts. Maybe he was provoked to send those pictures. Maybe the women are lying or trying to get revenge on this person. There are litterlly no facts besides hearsay.
Have you ever heard of Occam's RazorI am saying we don't know the hard facts. Maybe he was provoked to send those pictures. Maybe the women are lying or trying to get revenge on this person. There are litterlly no facts besides hearsay.
I am saying we don't know the hard facts. Maybe he was provoked to send those pictures. Maybe the women are lying or trying to get revenge on this person. There are litterlly no facts besides hearsay.
I don't know the hard facts but maybe you're full of shit.
Yes. It's a conspiracy. These scheming women and their SJW white knight buddies got together and decided yesterday was the day to strike! And it's all so plausible too as every story reinforced the previous story.I am saying we don't know the hard facts. Maybe he was provoked to send those pictures. Maybe the women are lying or trying to get revenge on this person. There are litterlly no facts besides hearsay.
Ben has done nothing wrong so please revert your attention back to the person that has. Ben has the right to deal with his issues privately and him making a public statement saying that he does not condone Nicks actions and supports the victims is a positive thing and he's done all he needs to do.
shut up manI am saying we don't know the hard facts. Maybe he was provoked to send those pictures. Maybe the women are lying or trying to get revenge on this person. There are litterlly no facts besides hearsay.
Literally look at what you just typed....This whole burn at the stake is ridiculous. Some dude probably sent some pictures to some females whom all may or may not have been gaming journalists and probably fired on them hard and now people are saying he was sexually harassing them.
Games on this site barely get much feedback anymore, Yet threads like these trigger everyone, Even without the total facts.
Didn't take long for it turn around into blaming white males.
Games on this site barely get much feedback anymore, Yet threads like these trigger everyone, Even without the total facts.
Didn't take long for it turn around into blaming white males.
I am saying we don't know the hard facts. Maybe he was provoked to send those pictures. Maybe the women are lying or trying to get revenge on this person. There are litterlly no facts besides hearsay.
Games on this site barely get much feedback anymore, Yet threads like these trigger everyone, Even without the total facts.
Didn't take long for it turn around into blaming white males.
KiA or Voat. This shit always happens.Pretty sure the juniors complaining of white males being hunted like animals are coming from the KiA thread screaming the same.
Pretty sure the juniors complaining of white males being hunted like animals are coming from the KiA thread screaming the same.
Wait KiA is defending this guy? Hilarious since I would assume they'd hate this guy for being with Polygon.
I am done with this post. I will go post about video games on this video game forum instead of gasp about some dumb shit.
KiA or Voat. This shit always happens.
As long as we're in agreement that both parties can't prove guilt or innocence.
Purely from an analytical point of view in general providing evidence favors the acuser in the sense that something specific can be provided.
The acused can't just out of thin air prove that something intangible or many intangible things didn't happen.
--
In this case this wankery over proving guilt and shit is completely unimportant because it isn't one vs. one. It's a bunch of people vs. one. And a conspiracy to take down Nick is less likely than Nick just being not socially aware how to express his horniness with strangers.
Gaters are willing to work with the enemy if it means defending white males accused of sexual harassment.Wait KiA is defending this guy? Hilarious since I would assume they'd hate this guy for being with Polygon.
No one is saying that you need to blacklist him or you're complicit, but why do you need to see the severity? Is there a level of sexual harrassment you're comfortable with and you're waiting to see which side he falls on?Then scrub personal info from the logs, post them anonymously. This seems to be pretty credible so far, but I need to see the severity of it, some hard proof, before I'm ready to blacklist this guy who has, until this point, had a pretty clean track record.
I am saying we don't know the hard facts. Maybe he was provoked to send those pictures. Maybe the women are lying or trying to get revenge on this person. There are litterlly no facts besides hearsay.
those dumb motherfuckers will take literally any possible excuse to shitpost and harass women, any at all.
Not necessarily. While there are a lot of cases where people look back regretting that they downplayed warning signs or dismissed warning comments as not a big deal, there are a lot of cases where people are legitimately blindsided too. There's a lot of layers to how and to whom women choose to share information regarding people who have harassed them. It's not usually as simple as "if it was widely known among this group, that group probably knew too."The gaming industry, when even supposed progressive websites have people like this. You can defend Polygon all you want, but this was an "open secret" in the industry, so someone higher up in there knew about it and did nothing.
One less gaming website/channel to visit.
Wait KiA is defending this guy? Hilarious since I would assume they'd hate this guy for being with Polygon.
I feel terrible for giving this guy views. I was a huge fan of his in the past.
What is KiA?
Reddit's KotakuInAction subreddit, aka Gamergate HQ.What is KiA?
What is KiA?
Can we atleast see one message with the names blurred out.
I believe the women but arnt you guys curious?
Not necessarily. While there are a lot of cases where people look back regretting that they downplayed warning signs or dismissed warning comments as not a big deal, there are a lot of cases where people are legitimately blindsided too. There's a lot of layers to how and to whom women choose to share information regarding people who have harassed them. It's not usually as simple as "if it was widely known among this group, that group probably knew too."
Lot of serial abusers/harassers/creeps, sure, don't realize what they are doing is wrong, and are more likely to have their actions witnessed by someone close to them or who is willing to approach someone close to them, but many also realize that what they are doing is wrong and choose to do so secretly.
Oh totally. One would hope that this was indeed surprising to them and one would also hope that it forces them to take a real close look to see if there's anything they could have done to make it more accessible for people to feel comfortable coming forward. I think that what you have written here is an obvious first thing to look at.I understand that, but I'm not about to give the gaming industry the benefit of the doubt, Polygon is still being run by privileged white men.
Any curiosity you may have is irrelevant. This isn't a TV drama, this is real life. These women have a lot to risk by coming forward - professionally, socially, emotionally - even if they attempted to do so in an anonymous manner.I believe the women but arnt you guys curious?
What is KiA?
Then scrub personal info from the logs, post them anonymously. This seems to be pretty credible so far, but I need to see the severity of it, some hard proof, before I'm ready to blacklist this guy who has, until this point, had a pretty clean track record.
That sounds like literally hell...kotaku in action
it was one of the main subreddits for gamergate that's basically just a anti-sjw pro-trump celibate nightmare factory nowadays
What's the point. People will interpret it to fit their own view. It's easy to discredit basically anything if you want to. The only thing that would come of sharing anything like that is a person with a crosshair on their back, even if they're just relaying a screenshot.Can we atleast see one message with the names blurred out.
I believe the women but arnt you guys curious?
I'm going to wait on Vox Media, who has pledged to fight sexual harassment online, who surely will look at this because of their obligation as a company and their public stance on this topic.Can we atleast see one message with the names blurred out.
I believe the women but arnt you guys curious?
But dick pics would really add some levity and help me forget that he was making people feel very bad at their place of work.Any curiosity you may have is irrelevant. This isn't a TV drama, this is real life. These women have a lot to risk by coming forward - professionally, socially, emotionally - even if they attempted to do so in an anonymous manner.