Femmeworth
Banned
As long as IntSys isn't touched Nintendo can do whatever.
Meh, Miyamoto could've made Halo if he wanted to.-WindYoshi- said:YES!
Halo for Wii confirmed!
Forgotten Ancient said:Yup. The Wii has been nothing but a depressing disappointment for me. More first party software isn't the answer I'm looking for to correct that either.
so far, nintendo isn't making new ip for core players. if you want that, third parties seem like a more likely place of hope.beef3483 said:Christ, does it really matter where the games come from?
birdchili said:so far, nintendo isn't making new ip for core players. if you want that, third parties seem like a more likely place of hope.
BishopLamont said:Meh, Miyamoto could've made Halo if he wanted to.
they're not abandoning them, but they're giving them a lot of gamecube sequels so far. even mario didn't seem as "designed for wii control" as it should have - new ip lets you design for the controller with more freedom.beef3483 said:We'll see how much they do, but the acquisition of Monolith leads me to believe that Nintendo isn't abandoning the core gamer. I can guarantee Monolith Soft won't be making any casual games any time soon.
birdchili said:they're not abandoning them, but they're giving them a lot of gamecube sequels so far. even mario didn't seem as "designed for wii control" as it should have - new ip lets you design for the controller with more freedom.
drohne said:if this means that wii will get the kind of robust first-party software that ds has enjoyed, i'm sure i can look forward to freeing up a component video input for my ps2
It's drohne.super funk said:Are you saying that the DS has not had good first party support or do I need GAF Troll Interpreting Training (launch TBA 2008)?
i'm *potentially* happy. lets see what they've actually got under construction first.KittenMaster said:Am I the only one happy to hear this?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9513475&postcount=178KittenMaster said:Am I the only one happy to hear this?
i'm *potentially* happy. lets see what they've actually got under construction first.
I still feel like the only one happy with this decision.
kiruyama said:This is for the inevitable Golden Sun 3right?action console RPG
KittenMaster said:I still feel like the only one happy with this decision.
Nintendo already shifted the focus on the Wii in second half of 2006, most of the EAD teams are working on Wii titles. Basically Nintendo has reached the point of shifting now (hence the announcement), means that several teams have finished their projects on the DS and are now concentrating on the Wii.DiatribeEQ said:Perhaps Nintendo is slowing development on NDS games because they're getting close to a point in which they (Nintendo) need to focus on the Wii for awhile, before going back to the NEW handheld the NDS2 (or whatever it's called) by the time the new Wii teams (old NDS teams) were working on, would be finished, then back to the new handheld. The timing for it all WOULD make sense, as it still is another 1-2 years off from anything.
I think they had two console teams and one handheld team. There might be four teams these days.Stumpokapow said:They're making two DS games and one Wii game that we know of right now. Do you think they're big enough to have four distinct games in the announcement-ready production stage?
Truth.ethelred said:I don't understand why anyone would be happy about this. It's ridiculous that the company should need to decrease teams on one or the other. They've got billions of dollars lying around; they should be able to maintain and increase adequate levels of support on both of their platforms; that they can't seem to grasp this indicates that the company has not evolved beyond the sad shell it was a few years back when it moved from one aborted machine to the next.
Money can't solve every problem. Capable developers don't grow on trees.ethelred said:I don't understand why anyone would be happy about this. It's ridiculous that the company should need to decrease teams on one or the other. They've got billions of dollars lying around; they should be able to maintain and increase adequate levels of support on both of their platforms; that they can't seem to grasp this indicates that the company has not evolved beyond the sad shell it was a few years back when it moved from one aborted machine to the next.
It might be bad news for Nintendo fans who buy mostly first party stuff. For the rest of us? Third party stuff will be awesome this year.ethelred said:I don't understand why anyone would be happy about this. It's ridiculous that the company should need to decrease teams on one or the other. They've got billions of dollars lying around; they should be able to maintain and increase adequate levels of support on both of their platforms; that they can't seem to grasp this indicates that the company has not evolved beyond the sad shell it was a few years back when it moved from one aborted machine to the next.
wsippel said:Money can't solve every problem. Capable developers don't grow on trees.
Teknoman said:Seriously. I'm really looking forward to this.
ethelred said:I don't understand why anyone would be happy about this. It's ridiculous that the company should need to decrease teams on one or the other. They've got billions of dollars lying around; they should be able to maintain and increase adequate levels of support on both of their platforms; that they can't seem to grasp this indicates that the company has not evolved beyond the sad shell it was a few years back when it moved from one aborted machine to the next.
ethelred said:I don't understand why anyone would be happy about this. It's ridiculous that the company should need to decrease teams on one or the other. They've got billions of dollars lying around; they should be able to maintain and increase adequate levels of support on both of their platforms; that they can't seem to grasp this indicates that the company has not evolved beyond the sad shell it was a few years back when it moved from one aborted machine to the next.
The awesome games from Nintendo for DS are actually only published by them..
ethelred said:I don't understand why anyone would be happy about this. It's ridiculous that the company should need to decrease teams on one or the other. They've got billions of dollars lying around; they should be able to maintain and increase adequate levels of support on both of their platforms; that they can't seem to grasp this indicates that the company has not evolved beyond the sad shell it was a few years back when it moved from one aborted machine to the next.
AntMurda said:Mario Kart DS was the greatest Mario Kart. A work of art that really revived the strength of the franchise in my eyes.
Lobster said:Yeah and look at Nintendo now??
Nintendo made the DS a success and let third parties take control after. They haven't put out anything worthwhile in the meantime.
HK-47 said:Advance Wars 2 says hi
Advance Wars: Days of Ruin, Fire Emblem DS and Kirby Ultimate Super Star is just as much Nintendo as Zelda: Phantom Hourglass is.Lobster said:Read my first post..
Intelligent Systems is not affected by this.
Nintendo didn't even make AW2..
Even if developers grew on trees, Nintendo is already dominating the software sales immensly. Increasing their capacity would hurt the 3rd parties even more.wsippel said:Money can't solve every problem. Capable developers don't grow on trees.
Shift happens. Levels of resources going towards various projects don't remain static or on constant upswings.ethelred said:I don't understand why anyone would be happy about this. It's ridiculous that the company should need to decrease teams on one or the other. They've got billions of dollars lying around; they should be able to maintain and increase adequate levels of support on both of their platforms; that they can't seem to grasp this indicates that the company has not evolved beyond the sad shell it was a few years back when it moved from one aborted machine to the next.
How long i will have to keep posting this?JoshuaJSlone said:Shift happens. Levels of resources going towards various projects don't remain static or on constant upswings.
I don't get the freaking out over this, even if one strongly prefers DS over Wii. We don't have any context for what this means, or even a confirming source.
Q Looking handouts and their lineup of software titles scheduled for release are weak, or less impressed. In the past few concrete development to publish the title, but I do not update it.
A The number of the development team still has not changed much in many developing software. DS software development team is currently declining, Wii software developers are increasing.