• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Nintendo Switch doesn't support Optical Audio out....

"lmao why do you need ethernet cord, wireless is fine"

"lmao why do you need optical audio out? I don't use it"

I'm seeing a trend here.
 
I just noticed my tv has an optical out. Does that mean I could have been playing my Wii U in surround/5.1 all these years?

I've had the PS3/4 hooked directly to my Logitech 5.1.
 
just buy a dongle

it's not a macbook, you don't have to carry a dongle around everywhere and unplug it and plug it in
 
I asked in another thread but got no answer, does anyone know if the Joy-Con has a headphone jack? Because when its docked how will we get audio if we want to use headphones? I mean, even the WiiU had a headphone jack on the gamepad.
 
It wasn't on the Wii not on the Wii U. Why would you ever expect it to be supported now? Are you also expecting a Ethernet port?
It doesn't have an Ethernet port???

That is stupid if so.
It wasn't on the Wii or the Wii U, are you expecting an optical out port too? Why would you ever expect it to be supported now? ;-)

I don't like the lack of ethernet, but Nintendo has been fairly consistent in their push to have that serviced via an adapter.
 
I think Pikmin 3 does.

Regardless, if I hook a switch or Wii U to my tv via hdmi and then run the optical cable from my tv to the surround system does that mean I can get 5.1 on games that support it?

No. It would work if the Switch would support Dolby Digital 5.1 sound. But nintendo is too cheap to pay licensing fees.
The switch (and WiiU) is outputting uncompressed 5.1 sound, which doesn't fit the optical cable bandwidth. All your TV can pass on via the optical cable is stereo.

So in your scenario, you'd get stereo sound only.
 
No. It would work if the Switch would support Dolby Digital 5.1 sound. But nintendo is too cheap to pay licensing fees.
The switch (and WiiU) is outputting uncompressed 5.1 sound, which doesn't fit the optical cable bandwidth. All your TV can pass on via the optical cable is stereo.

So in your scenario, you'd get stereo sound only.

Thank you! the stereo through my 5.1 is undoubtably better than through the shitty speakers on my Samsung tv so I'll take it.
 
I currently run my consoles via hdmi into the tv then use the optical out on the TV to the sound system. Am I doing it wrong?

The only reason I don't do that will all of my consoles is that I noticed the Xbox 360 in particular had an issue with the sound being out of sync when I was running sound from the TV. Running the 360 optical audio directly to my amp solved the issue, so I just went with that for all consoles whenever possible. As it happens, the Wii and the Wii U are the only ones where I have no choice but to run optical from the TV.
 
That's cool. I think Wii only did dolby prologic.

edit: I still remember the first time I used the optical out on the Original Xbox for 5.1 It was pretty amazing!
GameCube also did Pro logic iirc. I was shocked that the Wii U did support actually surround sound lol
 
Can confirm betamax tapes are NOT suported.
And judging by the size of the console
Laser discs are a no GO.So NO space quest or dragons lair..

Wtf nintendo.

It's been ported to just about everything else.

And the definitive home port is actually the Wii version.

So I wouldn't count Dragon's Lair out just yet. ;)
 
No. Cables don't matter. It's the output of the system. The whole cable thing is a lie.

Also you could update your Bluray players with new profiles, which I did a lot back then with my Pioneer.

Only if your player had the necessary hardware to support the profile...those $900+ initial players? Nope...stuck on profile 1.0 forever...

Blu-ray profiles are one of the things that actually allowed the PS3 to remain the defacto "best" Blu-ray player on the market for a very long time...because as profiles were updated from 1.0, to 1.1, and so on...The PS3 was one of the only players that already had the necessary hardware (additional storage, secondary audio/video hardware, and eventually network capability for 2.0) and it only had this stuff because it was an online game console...

This came out of an ars Technica article from 9 years ago...

The 2.0 profile actually changes the minimum requirements for full compatibility. In other words, there is only one player currently on the market that will be 2.0 compatible: the PlayStation 3, which, with its upgradeable hard drive, Ethernet port, and powerful graphics capabilities, will be able to adapt to any and all future updates. This is quite the slap in the face to consumers who paid several hundred dollars for players that won't able to be updated to take advantage of the 1.1 profile, much less the upcoming 2.0



I currently run my consoles via hdmi into the tv then use the optical out on the TV to the sound system. Am I doing it wrong?
Probably...Most TV's won't pass surround through their optical out...So you're likely only getting stereo sound
 
wow it even does digital coax out! why doesn't nintendo include that? my dad's ancient 5.1 Sony HTIB from 2004 still uses digital coax, it is a needed feature and definitely not 'outdated' by any means

it's not a needed feature. It's 2017. Electronics don't cater to receivers from 10 years ago. They match with current displays due to HDCP. My receiver only has 4 HDMI inputs, so I have an HDMI input hub.
 
It's a legit gripe guys. A lot of people have high end headphone amps that work with optical input only. This isn't uncommon. Sure you can get a converter but it just adds to the cost.
 
It's a legit gripe guys. A lot of people have high end headphone amps that work with optical input only. This isn't uncommon. Sure you can get a converter but it just adds to the cost.

You cannot. There are no converters available that encode into any 5.1 format that can be transmitted over optical.
 
"lmao why do you need ethernet cord, wireless is fine"

"lmao why do you need optical audio out? I don't use it"

I'm seeing a trend here.

Optical does not inherently offer any advantages over HDMI for audio transmission. These are not even remotely comparable. Wireless LAN, as much as it has improved, simply does not offer the same consistent packet throughput and speed when compared to wired ethernet.

Optical is outdated and if your A/V equipment is from the past 5 years, unnecessary. Nintendo doesn't need to account for extreme edge cases of people who have very particular "5.1 headphone" setups, or people stuck on really old A/V equipment. Not to mention I've yet to see a single USB-C dock with Optical, so why would anyone expect Nintendo to include it in theirs?
 
Optical is outdated and if your A/V equipment is from the past 5 years, unnecessary. Nintendo doesn't need to account for extreme edge cases of people who have very particular "5.1 headphone" setups, or people stuck on really old A/V equipment. Not to mention I've yet to see a single USB-C dock with Optical, so why would anyone expect Nintendo to include it in theirs?

It's not about optical, it's about no Dolby Support. If the Switch had that, there'd be ways to work around not having optical. Converters would actually work.
 
It's a bit exaggerated of course but Receivers have had HDMI for 10 years, optical is an old, obsolete, legacy method which doesn't even have the bandwidth for uncompressed 5 channel sound IIRC.

It is still be used on technology released in 2017. For example astro mixamps.
 
Agreed.

I use optical still. People are talking as if it is the Kempston interface....

I had to look up what that is. Too funny.

I still use optical, as well. I was going to pre-order, but between the price being $300, the overpriced accessories, the nickel and diming such as no USB port on the included grip, I already decided not to. And I'm certainly not going to throw down an additional $400 on a new receiver to get surround sound.
 
it's not a needed feature. It's 2017. Electronics don't cater to receivers from 10 years ago. They match with current displays due to HDCP. My receiver only has 4 HDMI inputs, so I have an HDMI input hub.
Lol look at my other posts in this thread I was just making a joke about the subject at hand. Digital coax is more dead than optical lol
 
Is there a receivedthat can output virtual surround sound on any format? Kinda like the mixamp but with HDMI In? it would be a great device to have.

Also, what are your options if you want virtual surround sound headphones on the WiiU/Switch? or are there none?
 
I live in a tiny apartment and it's not exactly conducive to having an optimal surround sound set up. That and when I would use it, it's late at night, and would wake up my neighbors. So headphones have been serving me fine.

But for those that say use a DAC, which would you recommend and would it offer simulated surround? I find it useful for directionality purposes in games with a X-Fi Titanium HD on my PC and a DSS2 for consoles. Using a pair of Philips X2s.

It's been awhile, about a year, since I looked around, but there aren't any headphone DAC/AMPs that take HDMI. They all take optical. If you're using it in your apartment, you could just get a receiver which is technically a DAC; a headphone DAC/AMP is basically just a portable DAC/AMP.

Otherwise, you'd have to buy a converter, I'd think. Headphone setups are really one of the main uses of optical nowadays because they can't use the surround sound systems, so optical works much better than HDMI because, I'd assume because it has a much smaller cord and socket, and doesn't require power. (No 5V+ lines.) . If you want to hook up a pair of headphones to a console, chances are you are going to need to use Optical.

For everyone saying that Optical is obsolete or outdated: Audio Equipment manufacturers are still making good devices with Optical Connections. All because you don't like it doesn't mean that they're going to stop doing it.
 
Reading the rest of the responses it firms up what I said last night. I find it interesting people mock those of us with older receivers but don't get on Nintendo for barely supporting 5.1 in general. I mean its been a standard in gaming since the early 2000s and barely any of the Wii U games support it.

As outlined in some posts on here current hardware supports this standard. Higher end consoles such as the PS4 Pro, Xbox One S, and just about every new sound card on PC or onboard on motherboards support this format. Many high end gaming headphones that are new today use this format.

I have a preorder for the Switch and will get it at launch. You guys can stop mocking people in an effort to defend Nintendo.
 
I don't think you even know what an audiophile is because they sure as hell don't care about this.

You're absolutely right? Unless you just mean audiophiles don't care about money, so buying another external device is nothing to them.

Most tvs have optical outs still so

That's true, but not all of them actually output from HDMI to 5.1. Often they only output 5.1 if the content is coming directly from the TV (such as with a streaming service), not an external device. If the source is uncompressed audio, it will also be output as stereo. I actually ended up having to buy another pair of wireless, HDMI headphones just to get more than 2ch stereo from the Wii U, because my plasma's audio out would not send 5.1 due to it being LPCM. Haven't bothered with any consoles yet on my newer TV to see if things have changed, but I guess I can hook up the Wii U to see if it's still the same as before. I doubt Nintendo decided to use a different audio format either.

edit: absolutely nothing has changed. The Wii U outputs in 7.1 LPCM, it doesn't carry any Dolby Digital or DTS streams, and the HDMI extractors are just that. They extract what is already there, they don't "convert" anything. If a game has a Dolby Digital track, then that will be passed through HDMI, and most modern TVs will be able to send that out the back. If it doesn't, and it only outputs uncompressed audio, you won't get more than 2ch stereo, because toslink doesn't support anything higher.

This personally doesn't affect my current situation, as I'll not be having issues getting 5.1 - 7.1 even from LPCM, but it did matter for a long while for me, it still matters with some friends that I have, and so I can totally relate.

wow it even does digital coax out! why doesn't nintendo include that? my dad's ancient 5.1 Sony HTIB from 2004 still uses digital coax, it is a needed feature and definitely not 'outdated' by any means

Unless the Switch actually offers more than LPCM output, that won't work.
 
The slim doesn't have one anymore. Both the original ps4 and pro have it.

Still relevant to point out that because of that move optical audio really isn't a "standard" feature anymore.

The Switch is pretty much riding on having the bare minimum as far as features go so not really earth shattering that it doesn't support optical audio.

I think it's pretty safe to say if you're upset about not having optical audio you're probably not the consumer their targeting.
 
Still relevant to point out that because of that move optical audio really isn't a "standard" feature anymore.

The Switch is pretty much riding on having the bare minimum as far as features go so not really earth shattering that it doesn't support optical audio.

I think it's pretty safe to say if you're upset about not having optical audio you're probably not the consumer their targeting.

Although having no optical doesn't affect me, optical out is still fairly standard.

I looked at a slew of 4k 55"+ TV's from Sony/Samsung/LG, ALL still have optical out. Many soundbars available today use optical.

Every major console since the PS2 era offers optical out EXCEPT: the PS4 Slim, and guess what, ALL Nintendo consoles.

Nintendo didn't care at all when optical was standard in the 2000's because they never offered it. It's not shocking at all that The Switch doesn't have optical, none of Nintendo's consoles ever have.

Nintendo is trying to cut all costs and/or make as much profit as possible on all their consoles. If HDMI wasn't the gold standard now they'd still be using RCA jacks.
 
So flash media is obsolete? Are microSD obsolete? A faster physical media that doesn't require installation is obsolete and slow discs aren't? What's your point?

My point is it's something related to cost and not because "cutting edge" or "superior standards" "lol op what year it is"

Blu-ray discs are supported by the two other big competitors in their home console, Nintendo is calling this a home console and it's using an old standard. yes it make sense for a home console-portable hybrid but the company is calling it a "home console".

my english is bad but I think my point was clear.
 
Top Bottom