• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Nintendo: Switch is a home gaming system 'first and foremost'

I will more than likely barely ever use this as a portable, probably never split off the rinkydink side controllers for any reason.

Hoping it's a kick ass, competitive home console.
 
Yeah, the trailer told me:

1. This plays current gen looking games (Skyrim, Splatoon, Zelda, Mario) Literally two of the games shown are current gen ports!
2. But you can pick up and play on the go.


I don't know if you're being sarcastic or not but the trailer inarguably expressed a portable machine that also works at home. I'm not saying that is good or bad, just expressing surprise at the nature of the trailer. Same as most people who watched it.

The games looked great for mobile or home but I just watched the reveal of a new portable.


The distinction may be moot.


I know people who play 80% of their ds on the couch.
 
On the bright side, this means that every videogame on this console has off TV play. And that's awesome. Seriously, one of the best features on the Wii U taken to its logical extreme is a great concept.
 
Sounds like they have a back up plan in case this fails and they'll release another portable...

Also I'm hoping the side controllers have good batteries to additionally power this thing
 
I don't know if you're being sarcastic or not but the trailer inarguably expressed a portable machine that also works at home. I'm not saying that is good or bad, just expressing surprise at the nature of the trailer. Same as most people who watched it.

The games looked great for mobile or home but I just watched the reveal of a new portable.


The distinction may be moot.


I know people who play 80% of their ds on the couch.
I think I'm agreeing with you.

The primary appeal here is: mobile

I can already play Skyrim on my PC or Xbox One or PS4, so why show me that? I'll be able to play Zelda on my Wii U. The difference is, with a Switch these games are now mobile.
 
I will more than likely barely ever use this as a portable, probably never split off the rinkydink side controllers for any reason.

Hoping it's a kick ass, competitive home console.

In terms of strength, it likely won't usurp the current consoles on the market, but well, given how it's gonna have a unified Nintendo backing it....
 
Yeah, I figured they'd want people to consider it home console first. The console can play the same games than PS4/Xbone without too much of a downgrade, and the technology likely isn't inexpensive. They don't want to deal with the stigma of cheaper prices that comes along with handheld gaming.
 
Hmm , if that was true then why so many compromises to make this portable? Game cards, underpowered hardware (compared to peers), including snappable controllers and a reveal that boasts it's mobility over traditional home entertainment. Seems like a portable that allows you to connect to you TV. Not the other way round.
 
Would anyone as a switch owner end up with two portable devices? the fact that theyre still considering handhelds with this is bizarre

Eh I don't think they'd really market it towards regular Switch owners. I think it would be for people that just want a handheld, and a cheaper system.

They could try and differentiate it though. Maybe add phone functionality, or simply just LTE data or something.
 
A good gaming device is defined by teraflops to you?

Was the DS a bad handheld because the psp existed?
Any console can be saved by a great line up, but as long as the games are a complete mystery? Yeah, it's a pretty big deal.
People love to pretend HW power doesn't matter, yet it impacts how good a game can be.

Otherwise i don't see the point why i should be excited to be moving on from the WiiU, if all those games could've come out on that system just as well.

Even the jump from Ps3 to Ps4 wasn't as great as i hoped it would be, tbh.

Also, and maybe you missed this, DS was a great handheld, because it was designed to be that, it had a shell enclosing and was small, easy to carry around (the Lite, especially), and games were design to be portable.
I don't want to play Skyrim on the bus, like i don't want to watch Thin Red Line on my phone, and that Switch portable thing looks pretty massive to fit in a pocket..
What's hard to grasp about that? A hybrid can easily end up being a jack of all trades, master of none, and it seems to be that way to me, for now.
 
I'm literally baffled. The trailer did not express anything of the kind.
It's the same thing they did with the DS, which they said was not a successor to the GBA even though it clearly was. This lets them save face if the console fails and they have to pivot and push out a 3rd generation DS.
 
That PR fear the west does not want portables anymore.

The truth is, Nintendo announced their exit from the dedicated home console market today.
 
This feels like the opposite of the 'third pillar' talk back in the day.

In that, if the Switch bombs, they can pretend it was always just a Wii U successor and crank out a handheld with 'DS' in the title.

This makes sense for shareholders as well. I don't think it would look good if Switch were to bomb and make it look like Nintendo failed in the portable and home market simultaneously.

If it's a rampant success they'll totally kill off the 3DS.
 
Hmm , if that was true then why so many compromises to make this portable? Game cards, underpowered hardware (compared to peers), including snappable controllers and a reveal that boasts it's mobility over traditional home entertainment. Seems like a portable that allows you to connect to you TV. Not the other way round.

I agree, this may be another confusing hardware launch for Nintendo.
 
You guys do realize why Nintendo says it's a console first? It's Nintendo for, it'll cost the same as a new console, not handheld.

I'm in love with the concept, but this is going to be 90% handheld for me so I'm dreading buying two of these (wife and I) at what I'm assuming will be new console price. $299-$399
 
Switch gonna be a bitch to design games for.Which path to take?Handheld or console design?
Drastically different types of games.Not just in terms of graphics either.

Nintendo is risking it yet again ,but maybe it will pay off unlike Wii U.
 
Switch gonna be a bitch to design games for.Which path to take?Handheld or console design?
Drastically different types of games.Not just in terms of graphics either.

Nintendo is risking it yet again ,but maybe it will pay off unlike Wii U.

It's one device. There are no "paths"
 
Compromised? How is it possibly compromised?

From software partners and Nvidia confirmation, it seems the tech is there and quite possibly the 3rd party support.

Nintendo will of course have all of its games, portable and home.

It has "normal" controls.

This seems like a great Nintendo console to me.


Mobile Hardware
 
I will more than likely barely ever use this as a portable, probably never split off the rinkydink side controllers for any reason.

Hoping it's a kick ass, competitive home console.

Then i'm sorry, because it won't be competitive...it will be much more competitive then we are used to seeing from nintendo...but won't reach the ps4 or xbox one

But with an expanded thermal and power envelope on the charger it should be able to do some impressive work
 
If nintendo plans to release a dedicated handheld system they better tell me before this comes out then because I'll be hella piss if they dont. The idea of a universal nintendo console thats also portable is very appealing to me, a person that hasn't bought a nintendo home console since the GCN because I couldn't justify buying a system for just a few games.
 
This is just odd messaging. The interesting thing about this system is that it is a handheld, as a home console it looks underwhelming. The appeal for me is the unified games library between their handheld and console IP.
 
Well... yeah. Portability is obviously a major feature as it was the focal point of the trailer, but the tablet portion is still too large to be pocketable. I couldn't imagine actually taking it with me anywhere on a regular basis.
 
Of course their not going to start chiseling the 3DS' tombstone, the biggest Pokemon Game in recent history, is coming out, not just in hype but in people interested Pokemon Go has given them a huge avalanche of interest. Can't cut the head off the snake too soon.
 
I think this pretty much answers my question on the NX speculation thread earlier this year and locks the price to north of $299. I'm willing to bet money on that.
 
You have to design your game to be fully playable as a handheld game and as a traditional console game as well.

That sounds pretty difficult to balance.Both technically and in terms of game design.

Or you could not care and design how you normally do? Handheld "design" is based on hardware limitations that now no longer exist. Now design should be wants to be.
 
Remember how Breath of the Wild looked like it was running at 10 fps in the reveal video? What if they're saying this because the portable experience is shit compared to the console experience?
 
I'm fully expected a 'PocketSwitch' released in 2017/2018 (tied with a new Pokémon probably) that will be marketed as their portable. It will just play the same games but looks like a traditional handheld.

Seems like an obvious thing to do. Matches Iwata's comments about a family of systems too. The first Switch is the all rounder version.
 
Hmm , if that was true then why so many compromises to make this portable? Game cards, underpowered hardware (compared to peers), including snappable controllers and a reveal that boasts it's mobility over traditional home entertainment. Seems like a portable that allows you to connect to you TV. Not the other way round.

Game cards = smaller form factor, no disc drive costs, lower internal storage needed due to games running so fast from cards that they don't need to be installed to a hdd, saves on shipping/storage due to smaller form factor, less chance of the machine going wrong due to less moving parts..and card prices (the size needed for modern games) have come down massively.

We've no firm evidence it's underpowered compared to XB1 or PS4 (we know it's getting ports of PS4 games at least).

Although it has yet to be revealed, it's highly likely those controllers also have motion controls...so it likely allows them to have both standard core controls as well as Wii Sports/Just Dance controls in a single split apart form factor..so appeases both the core and casual markets.
 
So are they going for a three-pillar approach like they initially set with the DS or a one-pillar approach, with the Switch being the one Nintendo system?
 
I would imagine the battery life for the thing is probably horrible. Remember how bad the PSP battery life was? The Game Gear? The more technology you push onto a device the smaller the battery gets. Now those two devices were designed as portibles from the ground up, not meant to push boundaries, imagine what a console that's competing with the X1 and PS4 batteries life would be.
 
I can see a "Switch mini" a couple of years later that is DS XL sized and has improvements in battery, more efficient etc. Same exact library as the Switch ofcourse.
This to cater to people that game on the move exclusively.
 
Reveal trailer was all based around mobility. I see no reason to believe this is a home console first and foremost, really.

If seems to be a portable system able to connect to your TV if you desire so.

Thing I fear the most is the battery life and build quality. It's basically a tablet with controllers attached to it, and hopefully Nintendo won't take the cheap route and make it feel like a Chinese cloned Android tablet.

On the other hand, it the built quality matches that of in iPad or Samsung , price is gonna skyrocket.

I'm thorn.
 
If it sells well it will replace the 3DS, if it bombs there will be a "4DS" down the road.

Same with the original DS. Had it bombed we would have had "GameBoy Advance 2", but it didn't so that line was dropped pretty quick.
 
Yeah, with how Iwata was pitching this idea back in the day, I'm assuming this is a market positioning thing, especially since this is looking likely to be a $300+ device with $60 games.

Bingo. We talked about this before months ago.

Since it has a dock and there is no home console version its a hybrid. To me the handheld is the main feature. Thats why it has a dock.
 
Top Bottom