fluffydelusions
Member
fucking middle age nintendo
get off my lawn
fucking middle age nintendo
Most likely due to the same reason as the stream, it was a public performance.
Oh and the free advertising aspect doesn't magically make things right. You still have to seek permission to use a song for a production even if it is "free advertising" for the artist.
I thought it made sense. It's not a competetive game. Sakurai agrees.
For one reason people deserve to know that this is what Nintendo is, and that the blame is right where it needs to be.
This is what they have become.
Attempt to punish the only people who care about Smash Bros. Good work, Nintendo.
I'm not familiar with Nintendo's policies, but why are they like this? I mean a reasonable answer, not just "lol because Nintendo".
What do they gain by blocking this?
Of course they reversed course. Someone in Nintendo probably realized that they did not need any more bad press lol.
Wasn´t this all based in the inability from some people to fill out a form?
lol. they've been this way since the n64.
If that were the case, the post game screen would say "You are all winners".I thought it made sense. It's not a competetive game. Sakurai agrees.
I care about Smash Bros and I don't really give a shit about the tournament scene.Attempt to punish the only people who care about Smash Bros. Good work, Nintendo.
In the eyes of the laws they are more like movies than sports.Games, especially MP games, don't work like musik. It's more like watching a sport than watching a movie/listening to music.
Nintendo's decision was stupid, but... "Only people who care about Smash Bros"? I care about Smash Bros, but i don't follow EVO at all. And i suppose a good % of Smash Bros fans dont either.
Source?IIn the eyes of the laws they are more like movies than sports.
[thread=620946]There was a thread earlier about it.[/thread]Source?
Piecing this together with other remarks by people at Nintendo over time, I kind of get the idea Nintendo really doesn't understand anything other than fans in Japan, their home base.
In the eyes of the laws they are more like movies than sports.
Source?
...board games, which have corporate owners and legally protectable components, can't be restricted in this way. While board game makers can copyright things like the board design and actual printed rules, they can't copyright the "heart" of the game; that is, its overall design and general method of play.
Furthermore, in a 1996 case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that "playing of a [board] game is not a ‘performance’ within the meaning of the Copyright Act.”
.....
Video games are treated differently, though, primarily because they exist on a screen rather than a board. "A video game under copyright law is an audiovisual work, which gives a public performance right of the copyright holder," Dallas attorney and Law of the Game blog author Mark Methenitis explained in an interview with Ars. "Under the public performance right, the copyright holder is allowed to say when, where, or whether something is publicly performed, meaning displayed in front of a group of people larger than, say, at your house."
I'm not familiar with Nintendo's policies, but why are they like this? I mean a reasonable answer, not just "lol because Nintendo".
What do they gain by blocking this?
Sony and MS are actively encouraging new models with the share button and the gaming DVR while Nintendo are trying to stamp it out. WTF Ninty?!?
[thread=620946]There was a thread earlier about it.[/thread]
Thank you.
Piecing this together with other remarks by people at Nintendo over time, I kind of get the idea Nintendo really doesn't understand anything other than fans in Japan, their home base. Remember that Nintendo has made comments to the effect that they're still deeply worried about people becoming upset, scared, and discouraged when playing video games. People keep saying they don't "get" stuff like Internet, but I think that's not quite right. They get the internet - they are just afraid of it, because it's beyond a certain measure of control.
Combine with Nintendo of America doing nothing normally to listen to users and fans,or generally giving a shit. In this regard, that could really be a symptom of Reggie's regime. NOA could be taking the opportunity to communicate to NCL what the landscape is like in the west, not just in terms of market demands, but gaming culture. What fans want and who they are.
Instead they still don't even grasp what esports are, or that they've got people playing their games at events besides Pokemon CCG kids.
Pretty sure that was speculation, and given that Ravidrath speculated EVO actually reached Nintendo about doing it whereas the other competitions that streamed it didn't, I think it's safe to say it was a bit more than filling a form.
I'm not familiar with Nintendo's policies, but why are they like this? I mean a reasonable answer, not just "lol because Nintendo".
What do they gain by blocking this?
Melee sold like 7 million copies. "Only people who care about Smash", lol.I would reckon that these EVO fans are a bit more passionate than your average Smash Bros fan.
What an out-of-touch company.
A. They don't have a Smash game on the market at the moment, so the "free advertising" is useless(& I very much doubt that anyone watching EVO wouldn't already be aware of the Smash series).
I'm not familiar with Nintendo's policies, but why are they like this? I mean a reasonable answer, not just "lol because Nintendo".
What do they gain by blocking this?
If that were the case, the post game screen would say "You are all winners".
Melee sold like 7 million copies. "Only people who care about Smash", lol.
I'm not familiar with Nintendo's policies, but why are they like this? I mean a reasonable answer, not just "lol because Nintendo".
What do they gain by blocking this?
The fighting game community isn't necessarily the crowd you want associated with your family friendly beat down game.
But hey, people throw literal shit at each other at Pokemon tournaments, so it can't be that much worse!
Nope. Competition is never fun when you lose. Too much salt :-(Competition cant be fun though!!!
Eh? Do you argue this same point for music and movies? Even if just two people are watching if it is not at home it's a public performance. Numbers mean nothing.At what point does a company say, "The number of people in the same room who are watching a game being played is too many." they shouldn't even be able to dictate what people do with the copies they buy.
It's over, Nintendo lost. FGC wins. Hold that shit. Hold that L to ya chest, Nintendo.
A. They don't have a Smash game on the market at the moment, so the "free advertising" is useless(& I very much doubt that anyone watching EVO wouldn't already be aware of the Smash series).
Nope. Competition is never fun when you lose. Too much salt :-(
True, but they could have used it for advertising for Wii U and Smash 4; they really need sales for that. Though considering how late people who actually matter at Nintendo apparently found out about this I doubt they'll even have ads.