Don't you need to double those specs for morpheus though?
Yeah it's not like we should expect NMS to hit some visual downgrade![]()
No, that's not what I said.
I think War Thunder was already confirmed to be getting Morpheus support.
Edit - it is.
https://warthunder.com/en/news/782-WAR-THUNDER-IN-DEVELOPMENT-FOR-PROJECT-MORPHEUS-en
But yeah, NMS in VR has the potential to be awesome.
Nope, also not what I'm saying. lolHe's saying that Hello Games and Sean Murray might be lying, because reasons.
You've done a poor job understanding what I've said. Probably because you're too eager to get defensive.Then you've done a poor job communicating your point?
Find me this quote where a developer of the game specifically says it is running on PS4 hardware and the in-game footage is a confirmed 60fps.
You've done a poor job understanding what I've said. Probably because you're too eager to get defensive.
I'm not gonna check over something for you, sorry. And no, you gave me no link.I have already pointed you at the video I believe contains that information from what I remember. I can't verify right now because I'm at work.
It sounds like you think I'm trying to argue its *not* 60fps and that isn't the case. I am just not going to automatically assume that without better evidence.I'm trying to have a conversation with you, not getting defensive at all.
I'm asking you, given your stance, to counter all of the evidence of 60fps, both spoken verbally by Sean Murray, shown on stage at PSX, and in Hello Games hiring pages, and you have not done so.
The fact that now that they've changed to a simultaneous PS4/PC release and have decided to show off a PC build is not evidence contrary to anything they've said before that they are targeting 60fps, and I'm not sure why you'd assume that.
I'm not gonna check over something for you
Yea, you're totally not being defensive. lolI think you have things confused. I'm not the one who needs evidence running to the contrary of what has been shown.
Yea, you're totally not being defensive. lol
Read my post above. You're still not understanding my 'position'.
I guess you don't understand what 'scepticism' means, then.Nope. No defensiveness here.
I read your post. I don't think there is a fundamental difference at this point between "caution to believe" and "disbelief". Either you believe what Sean/Hello have stated or you don't?
I guess you don't understand what 'scepticism' means, then.
Not an issue on my side, whatever it is.
About whether it definitively runs at 60fps on PS4. You ascertain this is true. I am asking for proof. You try and put the burden of proof on me to prove its not true, even though that's not my position(I even said its likely).And this entire conversation has been me trying to find out what there is to even be skeptical about. So far, nothing.
But it will. I mean, he's basically saying it will in a cryptic manner.
About whether it definitively runs at 60fps on PS4. You ascertain this is true.
You said it was 99% confirmed.No. That never happened.![]()
You said it was 99% confirmed.
Show me why you are 99% certain, though. What makes you think that? That isn't a world different than being completely certain, I'm sure you'll agree. You're basically saying, "This is what I believe is basically certain, but there may be some random chance I'm wrong.".Well that's not certain then, is it? That's only 99% certain. There's still a chance that both I and Sean Murray will be terribly disappointed by the lower than 60fps of this game.
lol seriously
Show me why you are 99% certain, though. What makes you think that?
Thanks a bunch.I think you two may be looking for this? Hopefully this helps?
Go to 49:40 in this podcast where they ask Sean about 60 FPS.
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/podcasts/archive/2014/12/29/special-edition-podcast-no-mans-sky.aspx
Not 100%, but It's the closest thing I've ever seen about the 60fps debate for NMS.
I'm asking for something other than, "I heard from" secondhand hearsay. You weren't giving me shit.Please go back and read my posts. I've already told you.
I'm asking for something other than, "I heard from" secondhand hearsay. You weren't giving me shit.
So you're 99% sure on blind faith?I have not given or referenced one piece of secondhand hearsay in this thread, what is going on here?
Pretty much.Sounds a lot to me like "we are experimenting with it in the studio and it's awesome, but we can't guarantee it will ultimately be fully compatible/releasable"
So you're 99% sure on blind faith?
You haven't given a single piece of actual evidence that wasn't hearsay. Not one.
![]()
DELICIOUS
LOL, best way to simplify this thread into one GIF.