BenjaminBirdie
Banned
gdt5016 said:But Gaiman's Sandman isn't the original Wesley Dodd-Sandman. They are totally different.
The Sandman grew out of a proposal by Neil Gaiman to revive the 1970s Sandman series illustrated by Jack Kirby. Gaiman had considered including characters from DC Comics' "Dream Stream" (including the Kirby Sandman, Brute, Glob, and the brothers Cain and Abel) in a scene for the first issue of his 1988 miniseries Black Orchid. While the scene did not make it into later drafts, Gaiman soon began constructing a treatment for a new series. Gaiman mentioned his treatment in passing to DC editor Karen Berger. While months later Berger offered Gaiman a comic title to work on, he was unsure his Sandman pitch would be accepted. However, weeks later Berger asked Gaiman if he was interested in doing a Sandman series. Gaiman recalled, "I said, 'Um...yes. Yes, definitely. What's the catch?' [Berger said] 'There's only one. We'd like a new Sandman. Keep the name. But the rest is up to you.'"[4]
.
All those characters show up in Sandman. That's my point. Yes, it grew beyond that, just like Swamp Thing and Doom Patrol.
They're still superhero comics, as they feature superheroes.
Like I said, there's only one sensible way to categorize comics: GOOD and BAD.
To dismiss Umbrella Academy because it's a Superhero comic is like dismissing Eternal Sunshine of The Spotless Mind because it's Science Fiction.
