If there were ever a time to be rooting for China to invade another country, it would be now.ConfusingJazz said:Dude, they aren't going to let us in. China will invade NK before they allow us to.
If there were ever a time to be rooting for China to invade another country, it would be now.ConfusingJazz said:Dude, they aren't going to let us in. China will invade NK before they allow us to.
Askia47 said:I wasn't really talking about the elite though (I know they have everything), i was thinking mostly about those who have basic tv sets and smuggled media. Most of the bootleg items from China arent really shared or talked about either, alot of that stuff is underground.
Carrier Has Arrived.nubbe said:Don't USA have like 3 carriers in range?
Washington is the closest. Truman and Eisenhower are both in the Arabian Sea. The rest are either prepping for deployment or just got back. Roosevelt and Stennis are undergoing maintenance right now as wellnubbe said:Don't USA have like 3 carriers in range?
Ignis Fatuus said:Carrier Has Arrived.
Tatsumaki Senpuukyaku! said:I'm thinking that the US isn't going to get involved and this won't escalate unless North Korea ever actively tries to cross the DMZ.
One of the analysts who linked the Norths action to food aid was Choi Jin-wook, a North Korea expert at the Korea Institute for National Unification, a research institute in Seoul. Its a sign of North Koreas increasing frustration, Mr. Choi said.
Washington has turned a deaf ear to Pyongyang and North Korea is saying, Look here. Were still alive. We can cause trouble. You cant ignore us.
Mr. Choi said North Korea had become frustrated over the Obama administrations refusal to remove a broad range of sanctions against the regime for its continuing nuclear efforts.
They see that they cant pressure Washington, he said, so theyve taken South Korea hostage again.
Theyre in a desperate situation, and they want food immediately, not next year, he said.
John Swenson-Wright, an expert with the Royal Institute for International Affairs, also known as Chatham House, a private policy organization in London, called the episode a serious escalation.
I cant think of recent event in the past 5 or 10 years that approaches this magnitude, he said in a telephone interview.
Guardian Bob said:1538: US defence department spokesman Col David Lapan says no additional US military assets would be moved into the region
OuterWorldVoice said:Lo Pan
Advance_Alarm said:Did anybody read that new article in Popular Mechanics about Chinese AntiShip Ballistic Missiles and what the US has to counter them. It mostly focuses on the ROC and PROC but it was pretty good.
Brannon said:I'd like to think that our counter is that any ship of ours they blow it suddenly cost trillions of dollars and BAM!
We even.
I mean, what if I lent you a bunch of money, and then one day some of your family drove in my neighborhood in a van and I blew them up with a rocket because I didn't want them there.
By the way, I still want my money back.
ConfusingJazz said:If you owe the bank $500,000, the bank owns you. If you owe the bank $5,000,000,000, you own the bank.
and autocast interceptors.MisterAnderson said:Let's hope they have 3/3 and Graviton Catapult.
I'm not in Economics but from what I understand the gist of it is that China owns an absurd amount of our treasury bonds. If they were to release them, the value of said bonds and therefore of the dollar currency would plummet. They could, with that one gesture, theoretically crash our economy and make the dollar dirt cheap.Advance_Alarm said:yea I always wondered how a country calls in a loan on another (more powerful) country. I mean if China wanted its money the US could just say "make me bitch". Inb4 Economics phd gaffer explains how
Advance_Alarm said:yea I always wondered how a country calls in a loan on another (more powerful) country. I mean if China wanted its money the US could just say "make me bitch". Inb4 Economics phd gaffer explains how
Ignis Fatuus said:I'm not in Economics but from what I understand the gist of it is that China owns an absurd amount of our treasury bonds. If they were to release them, the value of said bonds and therefore of the dollar currency would plummet. They could, with that one gesture, theoretically crash our economy and make the dollar dirt cheap.
.
.Ignis Fatuus said:Carrier Has Arrived.
Deku said:They can't do that as it would make their competitive position untenable.
LoLOuterWorldVoice said:
Sealda said:Well, if they did the whole world would be flipped in a couple of days anyways so it does not matter. USAs economy would crash and nothing would look like it does today. Maybe China would win doing it, maybe they wont. I do not think they feel like gambling. I am pretty sure USA rather start a world war III before a scenario where the Dollar crashed happened.
Tried that already.lethial said:All South Korea has to do is blast some K-Pop into the North.
Sealda said:Well, if they did the whole world would be flipped in a couple of days anyways so it does not matter. USAs economy would crash and nothing would look like it does today. Maybe China would win doing it, maybe they wont. I do not think they feel like gambling. I am pretty sure USA rather start a world war III before a scenario where the Dollar crashed happened.
How are they crazy? I have a friend living there for years and loves it. He is actually kind of crazy though.1stStrike said:Glad I'm not stationed in South Korea anymore (and out of the military). I departed that crazy place back in May and don't miss it at all.
Zzoram said:China could end this if the US/SK/UN promised to permit them to gun down NK refugees trying to enter China. China is the only country with enough access to sabotage missle launch sites during a US/SK simultaneous bombardment of artillery placements.
As stated, the main reason for not attacking is because NK could bombard SK and possibly Japan killing millions, the millions of refugees would flood out of NK and overwhelm China and SK causing integration problems for decades. Even if there was a way to first strike NK and prevent any retaliation, there needs to be a deal made about how best to keep the NK refugees in NK. The only way is to agree to a human rights atrocity of gunning down refugees as they try to cross but this is a tough sell for people who don't understand what's at risk.
:lolIgnis Fatuus said:Carrier Has Arrived.
Advance_Alarm said:yea I always wondered how a country calls in a loan on another (more powerful) country. I mean if China wanted its money the US could just say "make me bitch". Inb4 Economics phd gaffer explains how
Dice said:Tried that already.
The Lamonster said:How are they crazy? I have a friend living there for years and loves it. He is actually kind of crazy though.
Tacitus_ said:Don't they have loudspeakers blasting all kinds of stuff into the DMZ?
Jamesfrom818 said:They should have huge screens the size of the one in Cowboys Stadium showing South Korean television. If they can't be reasoned with, they will be seduced by Hyori Lee dancing in a soju commercial.
MiDNiGHTS said:I guess the question is were Bush/Clinton right in giving NK money to shut them up and keep them from escalating or is Obama right for taking a harder stance and trying to bleed the situation dry. Both paths have their own risks.
Tatsumaki Senpuukyaku! said:I'm thinking that the US isn't going to get involved and this won't escalate unless North Korea ever actively tries to cross the DMZ.
Norwegian Wood said:North Korea, China, Russia, Iran and APF
vs
South Korea, Japan, USA, Europe and GAF
WWIII
SolidusDave said:![]()
meh, only countries that still have nukes should participate, it's only fair.
perfectchaos007 said:I like how in all Matt and Tre productions, all Asians talk the same. Kim Jong Il talks the same as City Walk guy from South Park etc.
lol
fallagin said:WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF... I just saw this shit. HOLY CRAP