Tobor said:He'll take Wisconsin in the meantime as well.
Bulla564 said:A few legislations and political promises amount to little when the ties are there... once again, Obama is preaching what is working for him.
Bulla564 said:A few legislations and political promises amount to little when the ties are there... once again, Obama is preaching what is working for him.
thefro said:Obama won 55% of Latinos in VA![]()
reilo said:So let me get this straight... He outlines his policy, his political agenda, and what he wants to change in Washington...
Your reply is: Oh, he can't do it.
Bravo sir. You are what we call a hater.
Tamanon said:Yeah that's another huge number, all the demographics that were his weakness seem to be turning to him.
Prepare for MSNBC to spend the next hour and a half killing time dissecting VA and DC numbers waiting on Maryland.:lol
reilo said:So let me get this straight... He outlines his policy, his political agenda, and what he wants to change in Washington...
Your reply is: Oh, he can't do it.
Bravo sir. You are what we call a pessimist.
ConfusingJazz said:Dude, they are already dissecting the predictions about Maryland waiting for the results, I don't know what they are going to do with another half hour!
https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia....2-472E-8051-CF1B1C3786A4\Unofficial\1_s.shtmlGhaleonEB said:Is there a more direct link to results other than CNN.
RiskyChris said:If he gets more than 85% does he get all the delegates? 15% rule?
Again, back that up. Preferably with the same level of detail that benjaminbirdie melted my face with on the last page.Bulla564 said:That's what happens when you follow politics closely...
P.S. my actual answer is that he is NOT the innocent puppy he claims to be when it comes to lobbyists. He is pandering to the post-Bush change crowd.
thefro said:Obama won 55% of Latinos in VA![]()
RiZ III said:I really thought Obama was kinda over after NH.. can't believe he made such a huge comeback. Actually, I never even thought he had any chance against Clinton so all this is pretty darn amazing.
Bulla564 said:That's what happens when you follow politics closely...
P.S. my actual answer is that he is NOT the innocent puppy he claims to be when it comes to lobbyists. He is pandering to the post-Bush change crowd.
RiZ III said:I really thought Obama was kinda over after NH.. can't believe he made such a huge comeback. Actually, I never even thought he had any chance against Clinton so all this is pretty darn amazing.
BenjaminBirdie said:These wins are so definitive in terms of stats that there's no way Hillary will be able to survive a month of this kind of scrutiny, and there's NO way this won't have a gargantuan impact on the votes of Ohioans and Texans.
Thanks.Qwerty710710 said:
reilo said:Basically, you have nothing to back-up your resentment towards Obama except some off-the-cuff belief that he is lying? Mmmkay.
Then again, you are okay with supporting someone [in this case, Hillary] that has no qualms to pander to lobbyists?
Bravo, you are now a hypocrite.
Bulla564 said:Will try to get the source for you, but Hillary is preferred in Europe, Latin America, and many other parts of the world. Obama has a nice buzz going, but Hillary is better suited with established relations all over the world. On the economy, it DOES count that she was the wife of Bill Clinton. On November, people will remember the Clinton years, and you can look at Wiki if you want a definition for the policies of that period.
Bulla564 said:My girlfriend (has never voted or cared for politics in her life was the one that noted how vague and amateurish Obama was in debates (a.k.a in unscripted situations). I agree with her.
Bulla564 said:How will Obama start ending it? will he reform campaign financing? will he get rid of lobbyists? what policy statements has he made in order to change Washington? or are you just THAT gullible that you fall for his "hopemongering" as you call it?
VALIS said:I wouldn't go that far. Obama's momentum is staggering right now, but I still wouldn't be surprised to see Hillary pull out Ohio, Penn and Texas. Remember, even though our man Barry has been defying all odds, she's been winning most of the mega-states like Cali and NY and NJ and Massachusetts.
Then again, those are all traditional blue states while PA, TX and OH aren't.
I dunno. I wouldn't be surprised, though.
Bulla564 said:That's what happens when you follow politics closely...
P.S. my actual answer is that he is NOT the innocent puppy he claims to be when it comes to lobbyists. He is pandering to the post-Bush change crowd.
Amir0x said:1. So your lone belief of her holding "superior international support" (which would evaporate as well if Obama got the nomination and ultimately mean nothing) is polls that you can't even substantiate with evidence?
2. Do you have any hard-policy beliefs that make you feel she'd be better? It's true that Obama wins one of the most advertised foreign policy judgment calls (on IRAQ), so that's a point for him... but I'm sure you have more reasons. So keep elaborating.
3. It matters what Bill Clinton's economic strategy was in voting for Hillary based on her economic plan? I thought we were voting for Hilldawg? Any how does that matter, do you believe she's going to be a Bill Clinton economist? Many of her voting decisions do not echo his policies at all.
What does that have to do with you being vague?
The real meat of your post.
a. How will Obama start ending [Washington Corruption]? The biggest way is how much his is for governmental transparency. He is for building a database that allows the public to browse through government budget in full, and for disclosing how much federal contractors spend on lobbyists. He is even for not signing any bill that he did not first allow five days for American people to complete review each one, even to comment on them! This is a bit idealistic, of course, it'll have very little sway on the politics one way or another... but it extends the TRANSPARENCY of government, which is a billion times better than what we have now.
b. Will he reform campaign financing? Yes! He supported Feingold's Presidential Public Funding/Financing System, which was a HUGE step toward this goal, and consistently talks about the need for reform. He has already outlined many steps to get this down. Please read.
c. what policy statements has he made in order to change Washington? I have no freaking idea but maybe you do some research?
Amir0x said:Obamanation!
Tobor said:First he said Obama had no real agenda, BB schooled him, so now Obama is a panderer. Classic.
reilo said:Basically, you have nothing to back-up your resentment towards Obama except some off-the-cuff belief that he is lying? Mmmkay.
Then again, you are okay with supporting someone [in this case, Hillary] that has no qualms to pander to lobbyists?
Bravo, you are now a hypocrite.
Bulla564 said:I don't need an idealist, I need a leader, and Obama is not IT at this point. Maybe in 2016.
Bulla564 said:Because I am not casting my vote based on FANTASY (as Edwards called it) promises about lobbyists, when the country is facing an incredibly tough time in its history. It is not an issue that I feel the need to call out candidates on, when there are inmensely more important things that the next President needs to take care of.
I don't need an idealist, I need a leader, and Obama is not IT at this point. Maybe in 2016.
Speevy said:I haven't been following this.
If Obama keeps winning everything, but Hillary wins Ohio and Texas, does Hillary win?
Speevy said:I haven't been following this.
If Obama keeps winning everything, but Hillary wins Ohio and Texas, does Hillary win?
Bulla564 said:Because I am not casting my vote based on FANTASY (as Edwards called it) promises about lobbyists, when the country is facing an incredibly tough time in its history. It is not an issue that I feel the need to call out candidates on, when there are inmensely more important things that the next President needs to take care of.
I don't need an idealist, I need a leader, and Obama is not IT at this point. Maybe in 2016.
Speevy said:I haven't been following this.
If Obama keeps winning everything, but Hillary wins Ohio and Texas, does Hillary win?
Not if he takes Pennsylvania.Speevy said:I haven't been following this.
If Obama keeps winning everything, but Hillary wins Ohio and Texas, does Hillary win?
Speevy said:I haven't been following this.
If Obama keeps winning everything, but Hillary wins Ohio and Texas, does Hillary win?