• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Official OS X 10.5 Leopard Launch Thread: Hopes, Fears, Botched Installs go here

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think I just finally figured out the reason Apple had to hack Time Machine to reject Airport Disk shares: if the connection is abruptly lost during backup, there's probably about a 33% chance that the backup DB itself becomes entirely corrupted. I had to wipe it out and start all over again on one of my three Macs when the Airport crashed after having unplugged my MacBook's ethernet cord.
 
Jasoco said:
I don't get this. It works FINE for me. I click the network item on the sidebar. Choose the drive or User folder to mount and BOOM! It's there on the desktop.

network.png
Entirely unrelated but where did you get the companion cube icon from?
 
Kung Fu Jedi said:
Web Clips are kind of cool, but I clearly don't have enough dashboard space for some of the things I would like to use that for. I'll have to see if I can set up different dashboards for different Spaces.

Quick Look is awesome by the way.


I'm trying to think of a cool use for web clips. Any ideas?
 
It might be good to know that a ton of the OS X-critical apps have been moved to /System/Library/CoreServices. In order to assign spaces for Screen Sharing Utility and Finder I had to browse out there. Pro-tip: manually set up Finder to appear on all spaces so that file-transfer progress doesn't disappear and trick you into thinking a transfer is done when it isn't.

Sullichin said:
I'm trying to think of a cool use for web clips. Any ideas?

Penny-arcade and the Big Ten College Football scoreboard at ESPN.com
 
Sullichin said:
I'm trying to think of a cool use for web clips. Any ideas?

I was creating one for a website that has great deals on outdoor gear, but only has one item at a time, and it changes rapidly. I thought it would be a great way to keep track of the latest deal, but it takes up a lot of space on my Dashboard, which already has several widgets running. So, I need to come up with a better way to approach it.

Edit: By the way, it might just be my imagination, but it seems like Safari is much faster. I've been running Safari 3 Beta, but this version with Leopard seems to be pretty fast.
 
Juice said:
Yeah, my terabyte isn't going to be enough for movies/TV shows + Time Machine. I'm going to need to go out and buy another external.

I'd recommend people who aren't spiritually invested in Apple to hold off until 10.5.1. There are so many little bugs I had to workaround to get my obscure services/apps back in order that I'm almost certain I'm going to have to unworkaround them once Apple fixes the underlying issues.

That said, everything is fucking out of this world fast. I don't know how, but even with a shitty connection web pages are loading unbelievably quickly in Safari. It's like the browser is predicting what I'm going to click and loads it in the background. I think it's just really clever caching and a complete overhaul of the Cocoa widgets, which are all way way snappier.

and

White Man said:
From scouring the message boards at Apple, it seems like there are enough scattered not-really-major issues that you should probably wait for the first round of patches, unless you absolutely must have the new shiny now.

Because Time Machine will actually make you want to dedicate hard drive space to backups. I have a dedicated file server that does my backup shiz for me, and I am still trying to find a use for Time Machine.


well that sums it up for me. I'll wait till maybe March of '08 or so when they announce some fixes for it. still looks cool but I'll hold off. :)
 
Alright. If you're using Time Machine over a network drive, Airport Disk or not, it's beginning to feel pretty much pre-alpha at this point. Any of the following situations have caused backups to become corrupted, disappear, or (worst!) trigger a second backup of the entire drive. I've got an iBook with 10GB of stuff on the drive whose Time Machine repo is like 80GB because Time Machine is failing to properly catalog differences in files and does a full backup every hour.

My brief experience with USB is fine. If you're planning on backing up over a network, don't even think of:
- Making the network disk unavailable during a backup
- Manually triggering a back-up of multiple machines on the same disk (the others will just hang forever while the first backs up, it seems)
- Hell: using the same disk for multiple machines at all.
- Doing it with an Airport
- Don't ever think of trying the "Browse other Time Machine disks..." feature, at least not if you're me. Not only does the UI make no sense (what directory am I looking at? etc.), but it's slow and choppy and managed to kill a third Mac in the middle of a backup on the same disk with a kernel panic

Apparently I'm just too much of a pro user for my own good.
 
ckohler said:
Are you comparing the speed to the Safari 3 Beta or Safari 2?

As I said in my post, which he was referring to, I was using Safari 3 Beta and now I'm using the version that ships with Leopard. Feels much faster. Of course, I used Safari 2 before all of that as well.
 
Thanks. That's great to hear it got even faster. The move from Safari 2 to the Safari 3 beta was already a big boost in speed.
 
For some reason my web clips aren't working. I can select something, and then when I click "Add" in Safari it brings up my dashboard and nothing happens.

Oh well, I guess it'll be ironed out eventually. I do like the idea of having the weather.com 36 hour forecast as a webclip though.
 
Installed it last night on my MBP, absolutely amazing.

The most polished, gorgeous and fastest operating system I've ever used. Using my mac is a pleasure, not an exercise in frustration like my old PC's.

My god I just looked at the new dictionary. Incredible. The wikipedia integration is phenomenal.
 
I really dig the "find" command within Safari webpages. The highlighting of each instance of the search terms as you scroll through the choices is REAL handy, makes it easier to find what you're looking for. Plus having them all shown at once (with the background page dimmed) is a VERY nice touch.
 
the androgyne said:
Has anyone tried out PathFinder on Leopard yet? I'm interested to see if it runs much faster? Is the faster window resize system wide?

The new Finder's speed boost and other improvements sound good but i'd have to be dragged kicking and screaming away from PathFinders tabs/tab sets and folders listed at the top features!

One question on the new Finder though, are the breadcrumbs right clickable to show hierarchy similar to Vista/PathFinder?

I've been an avid user of PF since I got my Mac and I'm going to try the Leopard finder to see if it meets my needs. The enhanced sidebar helps a lot as do the breadcrumbs feature which I use a ton.

PF always felt like it lagged my system a little bit. Plus I didn't like how it tried to coexist with the regular Finder, I wish there is a way to just disable Finder and use Path Finder.

As for how PF works in Leopard, I haven't really tried yet. I loaded it up once to see if it even worked and it does but then I closed it to wean myself away from it.
 
Speaking of honour system (honor, fine), my friend is a big Apple fiend but he wants to test out Leopard on his Macbook before he grabs a copy. If I lent him my purchased copy and install it on his rig, is it going to screw with my installation (like some invisible activation scheme)?
 
typo said:
Speaking of honour system (honor, fine), my friend is a big Apple fiend but he wants to test out Leopard on his Macbook before he grabs a copy. If I lent him my purchased copy and install it on his rig, is it going to screw with my installation (like some invisible activation scheme)?
nope. There is a registration screen that you're required to fill out during the install process, but apparently it doesn't send anything to apple until you click the 'send registration' shortcut after the install.. which isn't required.
 
anyone else seeing Time Machine hang right at the end if a backup? One machine has been at 17.6MB of 17.6MB for at least twenty minutes
 
Dez said:
nope. There is a registration screen that you're required to fill out during the install process, but apparently it doesn't send anything to apple until you click the 'send registration' shortcut after the install.. which isn't required.

Thanks. My friend is going to go batshit now.
 
Sullichin said:
Is there any benefit to doing an archive and install as opposed to an upgrade? I upgraded because I didn't see the option.

It creates a separate folder called Previous System with the original System folder contents, as well as having the option to preserve user accounts and network settings; thiss does take some extra HDD space though. Like I said on the previous page, it's under the Options button during the installation process (on the 2nd screen IIRC). You may have also missed the Customize option as well, which lets you scale back on some of the things that get installed (X11, Additional Language Support, Printer Drivers, etc), which can save a good chunk of space if you're sure you'll never use those features.

I just finally got Leopard myself and I'm stoked to run it through the paces.
 
Sullichin said:
You know, you can minimize a window in OSX too. Except with minimizing, I would have to minimize every other window *except* mail, and then click mail, to get the same effect as just clicking the Mail icon in my dock and having it on its own screen.
Actually, you could just hold the option key and click Mail to get the same effect. That will hide all other apps besides the one you are launching from the dock.
 
Teddman said:
Actually, you could just hold the option key and click Mail to get the same effect. That will hide all other apps besides the one you are launching from the dock.

That could work but what if you wanted to maximize everything that was open again after you were done with Mail?
 
yayaba said:
That could work but what if you wanted to maximize everything that was open again after you were done with Mail?
In the Application menu (the menu where Show/Hide is) there is a "Show All" option. If you hide multiple windows you can click that to bring them all back.
 
Juice said:
Did you try to check the preference in Finder "Show items on the desktop: Connected servers"?


Yeah, I did have that checked, it just took a while to show up. Indexing or something, maybe?

Still no dice on my Not Seeing Windows Machines issues. Going by the Apple support forums, this is apparently a somewhat common problem. Difficult to believe something so basic could slip by. The version of SMB this requires worked fine in 10.4, and it's not like SMB has changed at all. In like a decade.

But then again, all evidence shows this is likely not an SMB issue, but a problem with Finder (which means we may wait a while for a fix). I can still access my machines, I just can't see them.
 
Here's a neat Stacks tip:

Hold the option key down while clicking on a folder or file inside a Stack. It will launch it without closing the fan/grid view, so you can quickly launch five or six files/folders that way.
 
Since my sister's laptop is acting up, she wants to borrow my MBP to take her finals on it. The only problem is that her school strongly advises against using Leopard until they've gotten a chance to properly test it with their test-taking software. If I install Leopard now and use Time Machine to back my stuff up, can I just reformat my computer and install Tiger from the 2 disks that came with the computer so she can take her finals and then reinstall Leopard and copy the files back over using Time Machine?
 
Sullichin said:
Is there any benefit to doing an archive and install as opposed to an upgrade? I upgraded because I didn't see the option.
Yeah, are any of the "upgraders" having issues?

Ironically, it seems that clean install or archive & install folks are having the most problems. I was going to do an archive & install, but now I may just go for a simple upgrade. Probably waiting for 10.5.1 though...
 
Is Web Clip working for anyone else?

It shows the "add" part in Safari and lets me pick my selection, and then it activates Dashboard, but the widget it was supposed to create just doesn't appear at all. I've tried this one two Macs now both the same result.

edit: works fine on iMac G5, not my Intel Macs...weird.
 
Sean said:
Is Web Clip working for anyone else?

It shows the "add" part in Safari and lets me pick my selection, and then it activates Dashboard, but the widget it was supposed to create just doesn't appear at all. I've tried this one two Macs now both the same result.

edit: works fine on iMac G5, not my Intel Macs...weird.

Hmm... odd. Working fine on my MacBook.
 
Okay, is there any way I can set up a named server as a favorite or something, so it ALWAYS shows up in the lefthand pane of Finder, even if it OSX hasn't discovered it via its own volition? My other machines seem to be found find with the Go. . .command, so I can connect to them via that way. It's just a pain in the ass to do that every time I want to connect to them.
 
White Man said:
Okay, is there any way I can set up a named server as a favorite or something, so it ALWAYS shows up in the lefthand pane of Finder, even if it OSX hasn't discovered it via its own volition? My other machines seem to be found find with the Go. . .command, so I can connect to them via that way. It's just a pain in the ass to do that every time I want to connect to them.
Dude change your tag. It's much too long and I hate the huge blank spaces left in your messages.
 
White Man said:
Okay, is there any way I can set up a named server as a favorite or something, so it ALWAYS shows up in the lefthand pane of Finder, even if it OSX hasn't discovered it via its own volition? My other machines seem to be found find with the Go. . .command, so I can connect to them via that way. It's just a pain in the ass to do that every time I want to connect to them.

I made my three airport disks login items on the account pref pane. Two of them show up in the devices section of the left pane. Third one doesn't... *shrug*

This weekend has reminded me thoroughly how buggy Tiger was on day one.

Now I'm remembering that Tiger wasn't really stable until 10.4.6.

*sigh*
 
typo said:
It launches fairly quickly, but my GIF animation speeds seem to be slower. Anyone else have this issue?

That happens to me in Safari 3 Beta in Tiger. I just use Firefox anyway. Camino tends to crash too much. :-\
 
Juice said:
I made my three airport disks login items on the account pref pane. Two of them show up in the devices section of the left pane. Third one doesn't... *shrug*

This weekend has reminded me thoroughly how buggy Tiger was on day one.

Now I'm remembering that Tiger wasn't really stable until 10.4.6.

*sigh*

Awesome. That will get the job done until things are patched. If I couldn't find a convenient solution for that, I would have probably just ended up praying for fast patches. Now I could at least get things set up.

Oh, maybe you would know this--has anyone begun to compile a list of apps that have issues, or work differently in Leopard? Like I saw the Quicksilver thing mentioned before (is Butler working fine? Butler > Quicksilver anyway, as long as you don't mind the fiddly configurationprocess). I am mainly worried about all my precious precious video encoding stuff, since a lot of that is made by OSS people that put off fixing things until the last possible moment and then waiting another 6 months. My Apple and Adobe stuff and the like should all be working well, I guess.

Anyway, cool, I feel much better knowing that I can start setting things up without fear of being able to have the MacBook Pro integrated into my network, even if the solution is a workaround for a pretty blatant problem. I'm going to hold off on installing Leopard on the Mac Pro for now, which means, well, not booting into Tiger since I am sure it will tell me my Boot Camp is expired and I use Windows plenty on that. Patch quickly, Apple!

Also, general speed is much faster in most things, which kind of surprised me. I mean, I'd heard of that with past new versions of OSX, but I kinda thought people were talking out of their ass.

I guess this whole thang just irked me a weeeeee bit because I didn't jump on 10.4 until the Intel launch, so I bet most of the major software issues had long since been ironed out by then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom