plagiarize
Banned
ah yes, the classic GAF 'Who cares what people who have actually played the game think, I SAW A VIDEO' defense.jonnybryce said:While it's great that Gamespot is your "go-to" review destination, feel free to watch the gameplay happen before you on Gametrailers, where they join the admission parade of this game not being for everyone, that it is very easy and is not as developed as one would hope. A question was asked, I answered it and now the answer isn't liked. Oh well. I honestly don't give a fuck what Game$pot says, especially on an Ubisoft game.
A game can get high review scores without being the amazing game everyone needs to play. It simply means the game does what it set out to do in a fun manner, but what it sets out to do isn't for everyone. It's no secret this is a game made for everyone to be able to play and it's no secret that a lot of the challenge is just gone from previous Prince games. One of the reviews said if you put your skills aside and just come along for the ride, you'll have a great time. I'm not looking to spend $60 on a super easy "great time" without my need to master combat b/c doing a combo with Elika will "win every time."
P.S. IGN saying the platforming isn't "automated" is just false. If you watch Gametrailers, it is shown and explained that the Prince will jump off an object safely to the next object for you, for example. This, added with the fact that despite being an "open world" the platforming is extremely linear with 1 way to make it through just doesn't seem interesting enough for $60.
I never said I'm done with this game, and I doubt the others canceling their preorders did, either. It's just not ontop of the list anymore, it can wait.
i love how you accuse him of having a 'go to review source' when he quotes four different reviews and you only cite one.