Fallout-NL
Member
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:But plotholes and ontological paradoxes are not the same thing.
Bingo.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:But plotholes and ontological paradoxes are not the same thing.
reilo said:Here's an idea:
They managed to create a complex human-cyborg that was capable of infiltrating the resistance, but yet they did not bother to implement a GPS device into him? A piece of technology from the 90s?
Once they found out where the resistance hub was (they managed to find the sub marine!), they should have carpet bombed/nuked the shit out of it, killed John Connor, and then disposed of Kyle Reese because they had him in their concentration camp.
But no, instead they lured all three of them and let them walk into their base where the resistance had the greatest chance of destroying their building.
And why have human cyborgs if you aren't going to control them? They obviously implanted a chip into Marcus' brain, then why not flip the damn switch and take over his mind and make him a true Terminator? Marcus was in perfect position to kill both Connor and Reese. Instead they basically let him makes his own choices. Even HAL9000 was a smarter AI than fucking SkyNet.
reilo said:I also find it hard to believe that an advanced AI hellbent on killing the entire human population in the first three movies, suddenly wanted to coexist with humans by converting them into cyborgs. SkyNet has and always should be about the destruction of the human race. That's why this idea of SkyNet wanting to turn Reese and Connor into cyborgs is complete and utter shit.
Yes yes yes.Replicant said:The biggest crime that this film commit is the lack of unbearable tension that characterized the first two movies.
Worst cut: slow fade to black as connor turns to his wife to continue their conversation.
itxaka said:So a couple of questions guys.
1. How does skynet knows that Kyle reese is that important as to put it first on the list of "will be killed by end of the week"
2. Is the guy at the start really the one who becomes a semi-terminator or do skynet just uses his back story to create a new one? I didn't get that part, it was really confusing that the guy was looking the same after that many years.
Varna said:1. In the original script, they don't know. He just happens to get captured which makes them not killing him the moment they get there hands on him actually make sense. They don't bother explaining why in this one, they just do.
TheHeretic said:Just saw this. The whole movie is just fucked, nothing made sense. So you are sending Marcus in to kill John Conner as a sleeper agent. OK. So when Skynet is watching John Conner being killed by a seasnake Terminator it lets Marcus save him, as opposed to, I don't know, force his head into the water?
Skynets whole plan was just convoluted and idiotic, top to bottom. John Conners finally in the trap, which is a miracle to begin with, and instead of sending in like dozens of the older minigun wielding models to rain bullets into him, you send in one T 800 with NO weapon. For all the parts in which the plan could have failed, the scheme to kill John Conner falls apart when YOU DON'T ACTUALLY TRY TO KILL HIM.
That whole Skynet monologue was the worst thing i've seen in a long time. Firstly, it made no sense for Skynet (who shouldn't have a voice to begin with) to explain and taunt its sinister plan to one of its subordinate robots. Secondly, they put the control chip in the back of his neck which can be removed at any time. And as long as its in there couldn't Skynet STOP him from ripping it out? How about boring into his fucking brain, or booby trapping it. Better yet, when hes got John Conner in there SHUT HIM THE FUCK DOWN AND SKIP THE JAMES BOND VILLIAN MONOLOGUE SCENE.
They might as well stop calling these things Terminators as well, because they fucking suck at killing anything. The minigun has zero accuracy, and when engaged in melee combat all they do is throw people around instead of using their epic strength to strangle them, crush them or even punch them. Was there any point to the motorcycle robots that seemingly can't correct their own orientation when they fall down?
This doesn't even scratch the surface of the plot holes going on here. I honest to God have never seen a movie that made such little sense and took itself so seriously. I don't understand how people can actually make something like this and not identify the glaring holes the script is riddled with.
Templar Wizard said:i would say: refger to extended dvd at holiday season
gamergirly said:That's the thing that made me pause while watching the movie. There was no reason for John Connor to even survive. I fully expected him to be killed given all the Terminators, explosions(the one in the beginning could have easily taken him out), flying debris, and then multiple interactions with Marcus.
And it might just just be me....but there seems to be a circular dependency going on. I dont know who came first: Kyle Reese[Future-Back] or John Connor[Future]?? Kyle was sent back by John Connor to protect Sarah in the [Past] and essentially got conceived but how does John Connor exist before that???
charsace said:There were two points in this movie that made no damn sense to me. The first is when Marcus goes to save John. Can anyone explain why he changes his clothes? Its a life or death situation and Marcus is worried about his clothes!?!
The second thing that really bothered me is the ending. Why the hell did Marcus not get a funeral? It one of the few lines that stuck in my mind during the movie yet we don't get to see Marcus get buried. Can believe they missed the boat like that.
This was just a bad movie. A lot of good would have to be done to redeem the terminator franchise. One more like this and the franchise will be on life support like Robocop.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:Yes yes yes.
People forget how terrifying those movies were the first time you watched them. It really did feel like no matter what they did, they were fucked.
Varna said:Your talking about after? Yeah, that was a big what the fuck.Skynet patches him up right
As for the second question I believe that has to do with the last minute ending change and rewrite in general.
http://www.chud.com/articles/articl...NT-WRONG-WITH-TERMINATOR-SALVATION/Page1.html
In case some people have not read this, all of the glaring inconsistencies and plot holes are a direct result of Bale butchering the original script and tacking on the role he wanted John Connor to have.
Most of the big plot holes people have mentioned are given proper attention a closure in the original script... like what was the point in the cyborg project, why didn't Skynet just Kill Kyle and end the war forever, why did so many of the Connor scenes feel completely pointless, etc.
Scullibundo said:Yet the original script was even more retarded than the movie turned out to be.
Fixed.pswii60 said:No, not on the level of Terminator 1 or 2, but it blew
Varna said:Well of course most of these movies sound retarded when you are reading what they are about. But everything being played out on the big screen... I think it would have worked.
In my case all the plot holes made the movie shit, get rid of those and it's all good to me. I'm not going to be upset because they give Skynet a motive and future John Connor an interesting revelation.
charsace said:The best part of this movie is the acting. No one phones it in (not even Bale).
Akuun said:The more I think about this movie, the dumber it gets. I really regret seeing this in theatres, now.
itxaka said:So a couple of questions guys.
1. How does skynet knows that Kyle reese is that important as to put it first on the list of "will be killed by end of the week"
2. Is the guy at the start really the one who becomes a semi-terminator or do skynet just uses his back story to create a new one? I didn't get that part, it was really confusing that the guy was looking the same after that many years.
Surely the man in the center of things can't be as sure as we watching the film. Especially since in each film from 1-3 they threw some new time travel wrinkle so not even we all agree on what rules apply.charsace said:John wanting to save Kyle as badly as he did makes no sense to me because John will always exist just like judgement day will always happen, skynet will exist, and the machines will always lose.
I've only watched the first season of the show. But what you wrote in the earlier paragraph? Well, other than different actors that's kind of the direction it went: Due to further incursions from the future they learn that their T2 actions weren't enough, and make it their goal to figure out what else they need to do. Still a different feel than the movies because they didn't want the characters being constantly chased, though.Christopher said:I went in with a blank slate too just with basic T1/2 knowledge...man I wish Linda Hamilton, and Furlong would have continued where they left off trying to take down Skynet that would have been cool...
How was the television show did it take terminator in this direction or did it feel like T1/T2?
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:Yes yes yes.
People forget how terrifying those movies were the first time you watched them. It really did feel like no matter what they did, they were fucked.
omg rite said:bububububu it bombed no sequel no chance of that!
Haters be damned. Excited that they're plotting out T5 already.
Taking place in London in 2011 with a time traveling John.
Busty said:I can't help but feel that if McG were to get his hands on a really great action script that didn't have the obvious flaws that TS did then he'd totally knock it out of the park. I really think that McG has that sort of potential in him.
Roders5 said:Obviously there's all sorts of opinions on gaf different from mine but I am just completely shocked that anyone who likes Terminator 1 & 2 could enjoy this movie. I seen it last night and I thought it was the biggest pile of shit I've watched in a long time. Everything about it was just wrong, the writing, the characters, the plot, the terminators. I left the cinema angry to be honest, can't everyone see how much better this could have been?
Roders5 said:Obviously there's all sorts of opinions on gaf different from mine but I am just completely shocked that anyone who likes Terminator 1 & 2 could enjoy this movie. I seen it last night and I thought it was the biggest pile of shit I've watched in a long time. Everything about it was just wrong, the writing, the characters, the plot, the terminators. I left the cinema angry to be honest, can't everyone see how much better this could have been?
He also deleted a topless scene for Moon Bloodgood because "It was a soft moment between a man and a woman that was designed to echo the Kelly McGillis/Harrison Ford moment in Witness [but] in the end, it felt more like a gratuitous moment of a girl taking her top off in an action picture, and I didn't want that to convolute the story or the characters."
gantz85 said:Just about agree with most of your sentiment.
I watched it here in Beijing and the theatre was almost full, so I think Terminator will definitely continue to reap enough dollars from Asia to justify future sequels.
- NUMBER ONE problem for me was the whole Moon/Worthington arc, where the romance was forced right from the stupid vagrants trying to bang her and him saving her out of nowhere, and then her "loving the sound" of his apparently SUPER ROBOT HEART that beats a million times a minute. The girl has a nice pair of knockers but fuck, the whole saving-him arc was unnecessary and ridiculous -- why would a member of a resistance for humankind devastated by machine give SO MUCH up for something so suspicious? Terrible, I hope she gets canned in the next film or shows those knockers.