FoxHimself said:P = U x I
P = W
U = V
I = A
120V x 3.2A = 384W
PS3 uses 384 Watts at most.
PS3 consumes more than double the power of 360
Playing on your PS3 for an average of 4 hours a day wcould add approx $80 to your yearly electricity bill in comparison to the 360. The PS3 consumes around 380 watts of power more than double that of the 360, which uses 160 watts and 8 times more than the PS2s 45 watts. Today Tony Blair proposed a programme of crippling taxes to fight global warming. Lets hope he doesnt get any crazy ideas for a PS3 energy tax.
clearacell said:What would be the point? PS3's would sell out completely no matter where they launch so I don't think it matters if they allocate more to a certain territory. This isn't like the 360 where Japan had a whole bunch of units sitting on shelves where they COULD have been sold in NA.
A paper launch is good for PR, and we know Sony uses PR spin for everything its worth.
Mark Gonzales said:Without a PS3 ever tested..they come up with this :lol
FoxHimself said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm's_law
This is ohm's law, not some random shit I took from the air.
In Europe you'll have these values: 1.7A and 230V, to get a similar W output.
Mark Gonzales said:I didn't say you were wrong. I was laughing at them for comparing the max value of the PS3 to a number that isn't the max value of the 360 console
PantherLotus said:I would be willing to wait until March.
It is - the market hasn't been this wide open since the mid-90s. Very interesting times. I agree with you about the wisdom of delaying the PS3, btw. Unless by some miracle they actually do get 1m+ units out there by the end of the year, this launch is not doing much for them. :/ However, it won't be as squandered an opportunity as the 360, which was far more reliant on the "jump start" strategy and, I think, lost a really key feature in order to launch early (HD-DVD and upscaled DVD playback).PantherLotus said:No doubt. What I didn't make clear was that they should have delayed it before E3. Imagine what the difference would be if the E3 disaster never happened and instead they only had to deal with a delay. All they would have had to do is justify the delay (brue ray) and the bad press might have actually gone in their favor. Also, they would've allowed a HUGE Christmas season for BR to take hold here in the states. I'm only now seeing ads for HDDDVDs and BRDVDs.
If they had a bit more foresight they might have thought of that. Then again, I'm not paid millions of dollars to control that behemoth of a company. Maybe they know something I don't.
I still don't think a 6-month lead from Nintendo would have translated to that big of a lead. Now, though..Nintendo seems like they're gaining momentum and that they'll have millions of Wii available for launch. They're going to get a huge jump on Sony, moreso than if Sony would have delayed, because now...people will be going to the store LOOKING for a PS3 (rather than staying home waiting because they know its not out until next year), and instead will buy the cheaper alternative to satiate their children (or themselves) until they can secure a PS3 for themselves.
Honestly, we're seeing two very smart companies compete for Japan. I love the idea that each of these move have tactical precision and will have future impacts for their consoles. Interesting shit.
Speevy said:In Japan? No, the 360 is already dead there. MS' only hope is that 360 numbers are higher than the other two here in the US, and to gain some more lead in Europe before Sony launches (though that's pretty much futile).
Hyjinx said:I don't see a reason why they would reduce Japan's numbers before reducing the NA numbers. Dropping to like 360k from 400k for launch isn't as bad as going from 100k to 80 k (admittedly those numbers are pathetic already). So I guarantee that the NA launch numbers will also be reduced... how come GAF doesn't have a sad face to use?
The only reason they screwed themselves is because they didn't have the forethought to start fabricating these intricate parts for the PS3 further in advance to the launch. Had they had a shred of forethought, this all could have been avoided.Dr. Kitty Muffins said:Sony should have just commited to doing a traditonal launch (one territroy at a time). They tried to copy Microsoft (who botched theirs ) and screwed themselves.
krypt0nian said:Well the re-launch is inevitable.
But what about the re-re-launch?
*credit to ZipIt @ e-mpire for the news.
Dr. Kitty Muffins said:Next gen starts when we say so. :lol
False start!
We're not ready yet! j/k
Seriously though, is this all blu-ray related or Cell?
FoxHimself said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm's_law
This is ohm's law, not some random shit I took from the air.
In Europe you'll have these values: 1.7A and 230V, to get a similar W output.
Bad_Boy said:Supposedly PS3's Taiwan & HK have been announced by Sony. Some are suggesting the missing 20k units could be going to these two locations.
*credit to ZipIt @ e-mpire for the news.
Insane Metal said:That indeed is ohm´s law, but it doesn´t seem to be so accurate at times. The XBox 360 PSU indicates 100-127V ~5A... so using the same formula u get this:
P = U*i - P = 127*5 = ~635W... and that´s not even close to what the 360 really consumes.