icecold1983
Member
gta v has awful, awful character models for sure, but they animate much better. even without PBR i find the environment materials mostly better than witcher 3.
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Opinion : Witcher 3 is the most beautiful open world game on consoles
- Thread starter Game4life
- Start date
gta v has awful, awful character models for sure, but they animate much better. even without PBR i find the environment materials mostly better than witcher 3.
I must play the wrong xbx. I mean it's beautiful, but there is so much what hurts the eyes:
- character models
- resolution
- Main City hub
- Hyper aggressive pop in of everything
- Bland lighting
Considering it's running on the wiiu it's mighty impressive, but they had to cut a lot of corners obviously.
- character models
- resolution
- Main City hub
- Hyper aggressive pop in of everything
- Bland lighting
Considering it's running on the wiiu it's mighty impressive, but they had to cut a lot of corners obviously.
UnemployedVillain
Member
I always love when people lump the PS4 and XBO in with PC
Xaero Gravity
NEXT LEVEL lame™
Calm your britches. I was simply mentioning hardware beefier than the Wii U. Not once did I say they were as powerful as a high end PC.
Disaster Nebraska
Banned
I do love W3's world for the natural beauty, but I really have to give the nod to Xenoblade X. The world had tons of layering (cliffs hanging over valleys, tunnel systems high above pools of water fed by waterfalls) which gives it a very alien appearance.
UnemployedVillain
Member
I'm pretty sure I was the calm one
Xaero Gravity
NEXT LEVEL lame™
Whatever you say, man.
Filthy Casual
Member
I'd say this is a fact, CDPR did a great job on the PS4 version.
I very definitely and easily put TW3 and XCX as the best open-world games of the year (and for me personally in a long ass time in general, my two games of the year probably).
They provide me with different things (as well as very different takes on story, lore, and setting), though. I cannot fly in a giant robot in TW3, for one, which gives XCX a much larger sense of scale/scope by the simple act of giving me wings to go anywhere. But XCX cannot hope to compare with TW3 on a graphical level.
They provide me with different things (as well as very different takes on story, lore, and setting), though. I cannot fly in a giant robot in TW3, for one, which gives XCX a much larger sense of scale/scope by the simple act of giving me wings to go anywhere. But XCX cannot hope to compare with TW3 on a graphical level.
Water I can understand but which open world games on console from 2008 have that volume of foliage and looks as great?
I would agree, easily. I can't think of anything else that's even close. GTA5 has its moments, but overall I think TW3 is much better and more immersive. MGS5 has pretty graphics, but there is next to nothing noteworthy on the maps. Just big open spaces devoid of any form of life.
"On console", why would you limit it to console? It's not exactly like the 360 was as powerful as the Xbox One/PS4 is.
Cuz the thread is about that
I'm not talking about a game on console from 2008 that looks better than the Witcher 3, I'm saying the Witcher 3 is the best looking open world game on console, but it gets beaten by older games in both foliage and water, which is why I think the game could look a lot better.
Though you can find individual examples that are better done, there is no way that you can find an example that beats the foliage density.
Water I'll give ya, but the foliage is absolutely astonishing. I hope that in the inevitable Enhanced Edition they revise the water effects and add things like whitecaps, convincing shore waves and 3d ship wakes. It's the only noticeable blemish on the game's visuals.
The Baron Count
Member
of course X looks better, but the character models and shaders look very dated, and remind of something from that era.
Sorry, but no. If you think the game even remotely resembles a gen 6 title then you are simply wrong. The PS2 couldn't do programmable shaders the way we think of them period. There were work arounds created by several talented devs but they couldn't actually replicate what a system like the Xbox was able to do even.
There is no gen 6 game that even remotely approaches Xenoblade visually. It's literally a generation ahead because it's on hardware that is a generation ahead.There is really no debate to be had here.
Back on topic. The Witcher 3 is definitely up there, but I do think that AC at least gives it a run for it's money in terms of raw visuals. I would say what The Witcher is doing is far more impressive though.
Actually, yeah. I could see why someone would prefer the look of Vice City. Vanilla GTA IV is an ugly game.
I mean, it's a lot more likely than someone thinking GTA IV looks better than GTAV.
I can switch back and forth between The Witcher 3 and Xenoblade Chronicles X and they each feel really impressive to me because of different reasons. The Witcher 3 is such a high production value game with a focus on story and characters and has more variation in foliage, higher resolution textures and better lighting on characters, way better animation and of course great weather effects. On the other hand XBX with its focus on world exploration holds its own with the geometric detail of the world, draw distance, scale and world design (the characters and New Los Angeles look quite bad to be honest).
The Witcher 3 is technically the more polished experience. XBX's world is more immersive though.
The Witcher 3 is technically the more polished experience. XBX's world is more immersive though.
BruceLeeRoy
Banned
Dr. Black Jack
Member
Because when I think of the word "beautiful" the first thing that pops into my head is flat pixel foliage in a 3D game.
DragonGirl
Banned
I'm more impressed by the paint on the canvas than the quality of the brush. Games like Witcher, Fallout, Assassins Creed, they all impress technically but are visually boring to me. Vagrant Story on PS1 looks better to me, I'd also give votes to Shadow of the Colossus and ICO, the Sly Cooper and Ratched and Clank games (picking out PS games since there are some who like to dismiss opinions with the trite accusation of "console bias"). The choices of color, the art style, the settings and atmosphere gain my attention, not the technical achievements.
icecold1983
Member
I agree, art style looks way better.
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
Thornquist
Banned
The game sure is pretty, but it suffered too much from the Modern MMO trope - constantly looking at your minimap.
chekhonte
Member
The game suffers from all open world games unevenness. You can find yourself in a place, at a certain angle where it looks amazing. But most environments look terrible with bad textures, low polly models, abysmal water effects and bad arrangement. When it looks good, it sure looks good but no better than gta V on PC.
victreeb3l
Member
Its pretty incredible. I especially love how the trees and grass sway when its windy.
I absolutely agree and would go as far to say as I prefer it on console as well.
There are just some parts of the map or times of the day where the game just looks a little weird. The time of day in which everything is a weird red just makes the game look a little weird.
Bet it would look a lot better on PC though.
For what it's worth I played the ENTIRE game with the minimap off. Learned to navigate by landmarks and had no trouble doing any of the quests - in fact I enjoyed them more when I was not beholden to the minimap.
I was more immediately impressed by Batman AK, though that's not saying I think it's better than Witcher 3. They're so different that's it's almost an apples/oranges kind of comparison unless you want to break it down to a few very specific techniques and/or effects. Like, either game might have some effect that the other doesn't or can't do because of their respective environment or art design.
The best thing about Batman AK is the rain. I love the rain in Batman and how it reflects light.
And because it's perpetually raining in Gotham right from the get-go, it makes an incredible first impression when you step into the city for the first time and everything is wet, and the pavement reflects a smattering of neon signs and street lamps.
But then in Witcher 3 you get incredible swaying trees and grass (especially during storms!), which Batman AK doesn't have do to the lack of meaningful foliage in Gotham.
The best thing about Batman AK is the rain. I love the rain in Batman and how it reflects light.
And because it's perpetually raining in Gotham right from the get-go, it makes an incredible first impression when you step into the city for the first time and everything is wet, and the pavement reflects a smattering of neon signs and street lamps.
But then in Witcher 3 you get incredible swaying trees and grass (especially during storms!), which Batman AK doesn't have do to the lack of meaningful foliage in Gotham.
This thread makes want to buy this game. Especially knowing it's going on a nice sale at Bestbuy.
I own PS4 and Xbox One. From what I've read, the Xbone version runs smoother with more consistent frame rate, but the PS4 version runs 1080p (vs 900p) and is slightly sharper as a result. From watching vids on YouTube, they seem pretty similar but oddly the Xbone seems to have a slight edge in performance.
Has that changed with recent updates?
I own PS4 and Xbox One. From what I've read, the Xbone version runs smoother with more consistent frame rate, but the PS4 version runs 1080p (vs 900p) and is slightly sharper as a result. From watching vids on YouTube, they seem pretty similar but oddly the Xbone seems to have a slight edge in performance.
Has that changed with recent updates?
Get the PS4 version. It is the better one now.
Thornquist
Banned
icecold1983
Member
i was being sarcastic. witcher 3 is far from the best looking open world game IMO, but saying vagrant story looks better is beyond absurd.
sublimit
Banned
The density and graphic quality of TW3's world is really something unpreceded in open world games.Very often i just found myself to simply walk and take in the atmosphere of the environments.
What is even more amazing is that this was CDPR's first open world game,so i can't even imagine what they will do with the next one.
Xenoblade Chronicles X world is also amazing especially when you consider the limitations of WiiU's hardware when compared to the other consoles.I can't even imagine what Monolith could do if they had the power of PS4.
What is even more amazing is that this was CDPR's first open world game,so i can't even imagine what they will do with the next one.
Xenoblade Chronicles X world is also amazing especially when you consider the limitations of WiiU's hardware when compared to the other consoles.I can't even imagine what Monolith could do if they had the power of PS4.
jim2point0
Banned
White orchard? No. It's the least dense out of all of the game's areas.
Willy Wanka
my god this avatar owns
It really is best in class, especially when you get to Skellige. I played it on PC but I can't imagine the technical limitations of the consoles diluted the experience too much. One open world game that I did play on console and did wow me was Assassin's Creed Unity on PS4. I know the game had well documented technical issues at launch (and months after) but I played it post-patch and I thought the recreation of 18th century Paris was stunning.
That doesn't mean it's still not pretty dense.
Actually I played FF XV Episode Duscae right after Witcher 3 a few days ago and didn't realize how empty FF was in comparison.
DragonGirl
Banned
Do you understand what I'm saying?
Denton
Member
You would argue? Cool, so why don't you ?
Now this is a post I can get behind. With tiny minor modification there.