• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Overrated albums?

Status
Not open for further replies.
came here to post this. Decent, gets kinda masturbatory.

What the fuck does that even mean?
I would say The Wall is more overrated (still absolutely amazing though), DSOTM is just so unique I don't see how it's "masturbatory."

Master of Puppets I would agree with. I think it's an excellent album, but I still place Ride the Lightning above it.

And who the hell actually thinks Illmatic is overrated? smh
 
Overrated? My vote would go for the following:
ACDC_Back_in_Black.png

AC/DC's Back in Black. I love the 3 songs that define the album (Hell's Bells, You Shook Me All Night Long, Back in Black) but Bon Scott AC/DC had better albums imo.

If Angus Young couldn't solo the band would be dead from chord repetition after 25 years.
 
i deffo agree that non of these albums are bad, in fact, they're good, they''re too good and that's the problem. the albums are very enjoyable. i like them a lot. more than most other albums. but that's working against them.

i'm sort of into misery and disappointment. it's just a little too good and i need be upset with just okay. or good, but good that's bordering on average. simple, but simple enough. that's how i like it, the albums vis a vis music discs.

but actually i have some really good troll posts about big albums to ruffle some feathers. i might post those later and live up to who i am as a troll. i hope i get some of you in those traps. they'll be just okay owns. haha, we'll laugh.
 
Mumford is awful as well. They're on Nickleback's level.

That is absolutely... my god. Wow.


AC/DC Back in Black seconded. Technically, every album they ever released. Their drummer doesn't know how to drum and limits their ability to create music, like Lars Ulrich and Metallica. One bad musician brings down the entire group.
 
If Nickleback is a 0, Mumford is a 1.



011010100110 gives you Puddle of Mudd




Anyway, I find MPP by Animal Collective a little loose and less creep-interesting than Strawberry Jam.
 
There are plenty of highly rated artists I think are terrible, Queen and Michael Jackson for example, but I think that's kind of missing the point, so I'm going to say:

It's a good album, I can understand why people like it, I like it too, but their third album is such a colossally better record, and it doesn't have close to the recognition of their first one, it always seems strange to me.
 
In Rainbows. That people call this dull, limp effort a masterpiece equal to the brilliant OK Computer astounds me. It's not just overrated, I think it's actively bad.
 
Animal Collective sounds like four blokes doing completely random stuff IMO. I don't get how anyone can actually like the band, let alone praise them. I would say their only worthwile album is Strawberry Jam, because at least that one has some semblance of a good record, although I will never consider it as more than merely 'okay'.
 

No, I mean I understood your explanation it's just...

it just seems like a totally dumb/pretentious answer to "what kind of stuff you like?"

I think I'm just old. All these sub sub sub genres seem exceptionally dumb to me.

Basically: Calling something you listen to "shoegaze" because of what the guitarist does on stage reminds me of calling certain bands "crabcore" because they crouch while playing. So dumb.
 
babel.

I was on the public bus one the way back from college.

these kinds trying to be 'hipster' and so talking about how "mumfords new album is amazing" and i am listening to this conversation go down.

its so bad. the band is bad. their music is bad.
I fucking hate his voice so much, the fake breaking, as if he's so overcome with emotion, urgh.

And every song sounds really similar, fast banjo strumming, harmonious singing in unison, they are just so fucking boring man.
 
Ride - Nowhere

It's not a particularly bad album, but it's widely considered one of the best shoegaze albums along with Loveless and Souvlaki, and I just don't think it deserves that title. One of the most influential, perhaps, but in terms of quality I consider a lot of other shoegaze albums to be better.

i am now dedicating the rest of my evening to listening to this album on repeat.

I'm pretty sure this thread was designed to kill me though so I should probably stay out while people spout their bad opinions.
 
Jeff Buckly - Grace. So overrated. I do understand why so many people love it though.
Crazy talk. It contains the greatest cover of all time, Hallelujah. Cohen's original is trash, Buckley's version is utterly divine.

Man, that guy could sing.
 
Overrated? My vote would go for the following:
ACDC_Back_in_Black.png

AC/DC's Back in Black. I love the 3 songs that define the album (Hell's Bells, You Shook Me All Night Long, Back in Black) but Bon Scott AC/DC had better albums imo.

If Angus Young couldn't solo the band would be dead from chord repetition after 25 years.


I have no fucking clue how this sold over 40m albums.
 
good kid, m.A.A.d city by Kendrick Lamar. So dull.

Yeah, yeah, it's a concept album. I get it.
Yeah, it's better than I initially gave it credit for, but I still don't get what's so amazing about it. Kendrick's voice is irritating as hell, and some of the production is atrocious too.

You want a good hip hop record? Listen to one of these:

 
Revolver is entirely fucking flawless.

I really could not pick out a weak song in the bunch.
"Doctor Robert", "Tomorrow never knows", "Love you to" and "I'm only sleeping". It's a fine album, but to me they have some which are much better.

Oh look, it's one of the typical Neogaf threads where people will just post popular/famous things and say how awful they are.

The fact people even mention Pink Floyd shows what this thread is about. Either you don't understand music, or you are just doing it for attention. Even if you are not a fan of Pink Floyd, the fact is, the musicianship and style they used was mind blowing.

The guitar solo in Comfortably Numb alone has more emotion than 90 percent of music ever will.
And that is compensated with stupid filler such as "Vera" or "Bring the boys back home", ugly songs like "Don't leave me now" and "The trial", and boring/mediocre songs ("Outside the wall", "One of my turns" "Run like hell").

"Comfortably numb" being one of their best songs in no way makes The Wall a great album. I really like "The narrow way, pt. 3" for example, yet I think Ummagumma is a steaming pile of shit, with only one track I like listening to.
 
Animal Collective sounds like four blokes doing completely random stuff IMO. I don't get how anyone can actually like the band, let alone praise them. I would say their only worthwile album is Strawberry Jam, because at least that one has some semblance of a good record, although I will never consider it as more than merely 'okay'.

When they make some songs with actual proper melodies, I enjoy them quite a bit. But their albums are basically all over the place imo. Stuff like "who could win a rabbit" and "winter's love" are fantastic as well as some of strawberry jam like you said.

Their new one for instance is utterly atrocious sounding and I dont know how people claim to like that experimental stuff (yes ive heard people say they like dense manatee). Different strokes i guess.

I basically disagree with 75% of this thread though. Pink floyd gets my thumbs up as long as we arent talking about animals.
 
It's a good album, I can understand why people like it, I like it too, but their third album is such a colossally better record, and it doesn't have close to the recognition of their first one, it always seems strange to me.
I cannot agree that post-Cale VU is the best VU, sorry. Beyond that, it was first. There hadn't been anything like it in the mainstream before. It made a huge impression, both on young musicians, but also young music writers. The perennial problem for artists that make seminal works is trying to get out of their shadow.
 
Also:

The+Lonesome+Crowded+West+modest+mouse.png


A poor transition album between This Is a Long Drive and Moon & Antarctica with less soul than the former and much less refinement than the latter.
oh my gawwwwwwwwwd

lonesome crowded west is probably the most underrated album of the past 15 years. this post made me a little upset.


also, smh at whoever said animal collective sounds like 4 guys doing random shit. their music is slow burning, but once you wrap your head around it, nothing will compare. i honestly hated everything outside of mpp when i first heard them, but i kept listening to their vast discography and realized just how great their stuff is.
 
I cannot agree that post-Cale VU is the best VU, sorry. Beyond that, it was first. There hadn't been anything like it in the mainstream before. It made a huge impression, both on young musicians, but also young music writers. The perennial problem for artists that make seminal works is trying to get out of their shadow.
Self-titled VU could have been just as good as the Cale-era VU albums if not for one man: Doug Yule. His vocal presence on the self-titled album and on Loaded will annoy the hell out of me until the end of time. Lou Reed was such an interesting vocalist in his prime back then, Doug Yule in comparison puts me to sleep.

Also I just appreciate the ruggedness that the Cale albums had.
 
Channel_ORANGE.jpg


This piece of trash had every bandwagoner on its sack like there was no tomorrow. Glad this filth had been pushed into the farthest corners of irrelevance now. Not a single classic song came from this fecal matter.
 
Controversial opinion maybe, but I don't think being over the age of 30 is a point of pride on a video game message board. Just a thought.

I'm just saying that I've seen plenty of passionate music fans turn into cynical, bitter 30 year olds. It's inspiring to see people so passionate about music but its also depressing to see the same arrogant elitism that kept so many people I knew isolated.
 
Channel_ORANGE.jpg


This piece of trash had every bandwagoner on its sack like there was no tomorrow. Glad this filth had been pushed into the farthest corners of irrelevance now. Not a single classic song came from this fecal matter.

I wouldn't go to that extreme, but it does pale in comparison to Miguel's Kaleidoscope Dream. But I completely agree about the bandwagoner bit.

miguel-kaleidoscope-dream-cover-400x400.jpg



Let me throw this one out there. I was SO disappointed by it, it really did nothing for me. Had such high hopes, especially after seeing them live.

x.jpg
 
how

its like to the point where if anyone listens to Nirvana, threye're automatically dipped into a bucket that contains people who know absolutely nothing about music or are seen as fanatics of the band. I can listen to Nirvana's mtv unplugged for hours on end

I didn't get that one either. I've never really heard anyone say anything about Nirvana's first album that isn't basically "It's OK, not as good as their later stuff."
 
In Rainbows is way better then Kid A.
I really enjoy In Rainbows. It might be my favorite Radiohead album, but has stiff competition.

That said, those two albums are very different so a direct "A > B" comparison doesn't do them justice. I do think they're both far from overrated, regardless.

If anything, Kid A is rated exactly as it should be. When it first came out, people were really harsh in their criticisms because they wanted another OK Computer. Years later, upon reflection, Kid A was seen as brilliant and rightfully so; it showed that a band could change their sound while still keeping the music high quality. In the end it's the audience that's the problem. Being open-minded about music is way more rewarding in the end, because you can more easily appreciate the transformations over time of even your favorite artists.

So yeah, there's praise now but the praise wasn't always there. I think that's fair; Kid A had its journey and now it can rest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom