yes, the world is going to be destroyed by anal beads. oh no.
Anyone who thought this movie had a sense of humor doesn't deserve to experience actual wit and comedy in my opinion, because apparently defecation of this quality is "good enough".
They don't feel like brooding joyless worlds, yet they don't feel like cartoon worlds with the sharp edges rounded off, where people aren't allowed to be guileless (If you want to see how this works ideally, watch In Bruges).
Damn The Rock is a monster nowadays.
Oh puhlease...
In Bruges spends a good scene or two laughing at a dwarf because he's a dwarf, and another scene or two making its comedy off Ralph Fiennes being a bit sweary. Check your humour thermometer before telling people theirs is off.
You found Pain and Gain funny?
Oh puhlease...
In Bruges spends a good scene or two laughing at a dwarf because he's a dwarf, and another scene or two making its comedy off Ralph Fiennes being a bit sweary. Check your humour thermometer before telling people theirs is off.
Some parts sure, some parts I found stupid and other parts just made me smile and feel content. It is definitely a comedy, and when it gets the tone right it can be very funny indeed.
It doesn't want the viewer to laugh at a dwarf because he's a dwarf. I can see how a person who genuinely finds humour in a Michael Bay movie would think that's where the joke lies though.
Good to know.
"you don't know how much shit I've had to take off of black midgets"
then Colin Farrell slaps his hand like a child
the jokes are obviously around how short he is and how the other characters react to his height around him
The jokes is that he's a racist asshole when he's high on cocaine, and instead of treating him with indifference because he's a dwarf they treat him like any other asshole who acts like a dick when high. No matter how bad you have it in life there's still room to be an asshole.
eh? they call him "shorty" and pinpoint that he is a "racist dwarf", not exactly treating him like any other dickhead
The only thing I was really confused about was Marky Mark's love life.
Like, you see him at the beginning and he feels sorry for himself and doesn't get to hook up with this one really attractive client at the gym. Okay, I guess that's a bummer. But then midway through the story, you find out he actually has this hot stripper girlfriend who's convinced he's a CIA operative? And she's... even hotter than the attractive client. So why was he depressed again? Seems like he's got a good thing going.
And then he just hands his stripper gf over to The Rock. And that confused me as well. That doesn't seem like something a normal person would do.
The stripper wasn't his girlfriend, she was a mark.
Lots of good jokes, it was a funny movie. Marky Mark is funny, The Rock is funny, Tony Shaloub is funny, Bar Paly is funny, Peter Stormare is funny, the dismissive cops are funny. It's even kinda funny that Kurt Angle has a cameo.You found Pain and Gain funny?
Saw it yesterday, loved it, was hilarious.
Yeah, sucks it made a terrible thing into a dark comedy but it made for a pretty great movie.
In Bruges spends a good scene or two laughing at a dwarf because he's a dwarf, and another scene or two making its comedy off Ralph Fiennes being a bit sweary. Check your humour thermometer before telling people theirs is off.
You mean the karate chop scene? The movie isn't laughing at a dwarf being a dwarf, because there's nothing inherently funny about that. The movie is putting a spotlight on the character's juvenility, which is the joke.
Edit: I see other people have properly addressed this.
If you think Pain & Gain is glamorizing or idealizing the real-life killers, you're failing to understand the film. The entire cinematic tone is that of lavish exaggeration and decadence. By watching the film, you participate in the mutated American Dream that the killers tried to obtain. It's a character study, and intentionally or not - Micheal Bay perfectly captured the juvenile, stupid motivations of murderous thugs. The resulting film is like a waking nightmare,
To be fair, I do also wonder if Bay's ability to portray the world of these characters through their inherently warped sensibility was a conscious choice - or if it was just a natural fit. But IMO, it really doesn't matter. I'm not saying Bay deserved the Oscar for this film - but I think as a whole, the piece is a really interesting watch that deserves more credit than it is afforded. It's also an easier watch than something like WoWS or Spring Breakers, since Bay's not faking it when he stages the world in the main character's view. That's how he's been making films for his entire career, and it results in a seamless fit.Considering that the wide audience Bay targeted with the rest of his filmography just seemed to think this movie was a racous caper with Wahlberg and Johnson being wacky and jacked, I think ascribing him with that level of sophisticated intent is far beyond generous. Let alone mentioning this in the same sentence as The Wolf of Wall Street.
I can't look at Wolf and P&G without thinking about authorial intent. I just can't, and Michael Bay is not Martin fucking Scorsese. Occam's Razor doesn't tell me that Bay stumbled into a masterpiece of commentary on greedy murderers, it just tells me that he's tone deaf.
While Bay may have no ear for irony, it's pretty obvious in the script and dialogue that Markus and McFreely do. Maybe it's at odds with Bay's presentation and stigma.
http://arts.nationalpost.com/2013/0...re-fascinated-with-the-train-wrecks-of-crime/Considering that the wide audience Bay targeted with the rest of his filmography just seemed to think this movie was a racous caper with Wahlberg and Johnson being wacky and jacked, I think ascribing him with that level of sophisticated intent is far beyond generous. Let alone mentioning this in the same sentence as The Wolf of Wall Street.
I can't look at Wolf and P&G without thinking about authorial intent. I just can't, and Michael Bay is not Martin fucking Scorsese. Occam's Razor doesn't tell me that Bay stumbled into a masterpiece of commentary on greedy murderers, it just tells me that he's tone deaf.
Between this, Spring Breakers, and Wolf of Wall Street, we got three cultural satires so well done that swaths of critics mistook them for praising their subject matter. If you think Pain & Gain is glamorizing or idealizing the real-life killers, you're failing to understand the film. The entire cinematic tone is that of lavish exaggeration and decadence. By watching the film, you participate in the mutated American Dream that the killers tried to obtain. It's a character study, and intentionally or not - Micheal Bay perfectly captured the juvenile, stupid motivations of murderous thugs. The resulting film is like a waking nightmare, where every crime becomes wickedly just - and victims deserve their fate just by nature of their existence.
One of the best movies of last year. Made my top 10.
That's obviously the problem, those of us that disliked this movie (WoWS too, for that matter) just didn't get them. It couldn't possibly be that they were both turds.
I agree with you 100% here.
Subtle direction of the actors is what would've tempered the parade of violence, and made this movie remotely resemble a satire.
Considering that the wide audience Bay targeted with the rest of his filmography just seemed to think this movie was a racous caper with Wahlberg and Johnson being wacky and jacked, I think ascribing him with that level of sophisticated intent is far beyond generous. Let alone mentioning this in the same sentence as The Wolf of Wall Street.
I can't look at Wolf and P&G without thinking about authorial intent. I just can't, and Michael Bay is not Martin fucking Scorsese. Occam's Razor doesn't tell me that Bay stumbled into a masterpiece of commentary on greedy murderers, it just tells me that he's tone deaf.
Between this, Spring Breakers, and Wolf of Wall Street, we got three cultural satires so well done that swaths of critics mistook them for praising their subject matter.
Did you just seriously compare a Michael Bay movie to Harmony Korine and Martin Scorcese movies? Because Bay has nowhere near the talent of those two. Bay makes cool looking movies with big action scenes, but has almost no tact.
Also, there is a real difference between the critics that didn't like WoWS and Spring Breakers and those that didn't like Pain & Gain. Where WoWS and Spring Breakers were generally liked by most renowned film critics (even ending on many 'best of'-lists), Pain & Gain was panned by almost every big reviewer.