• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Parents keep child’s gender under wraps

Status
Not open for further replies.
TL4E said:
See the first post of mine you quoted.

But do you have evidence? If you think you are onto something, you should apply for a research grant, I'm betting there are a ton of men in academia that would love nothing more than to prove that they are better than women at math and science, so you surely will have no trouble getting the funds.
 
At least they didn't botch a circumcision and try to turn him into a girl, that doesn't work out too well.


The kid will likely conform to the social norms like everyone else does in the end. I don't think much damage will happen to kid as long as the parents teach him morals and give him attention. Not sure what unisex clothing the kid will wear in the meantime though.
 
ivedoneyourmom said:
But do you have evidence? If you think you are onto something, you should apply for a research grant, I'm betting there are a ton of men in academia that would love nothing more than to prove that they are better than women at math and science, so you surely will have no trouble getting the funds.
I'm not saying men are better at science, I'm saying they're more inclined to enter scientific disciplines.
 
I can see where they are coming from, but chances are if anyone is going to have a fit over a boy wearing a dress or playing with dolls (because tomboys are much more accepted nowadays), then this person is going to have that fit if they can't tell whether the child's a boy or a girl.

There is always the option of completely fooling everyone about boy or girl when it comes to a young child, but being addressed e.g. as a girl and wanting to play with dolls are two very different things that don't necessarily go together. If someone has to be transgender to have toys/clothing preferences similar to those of the opposite sex, then that's a bigger gender roles/looks/behaviour bias than what we already have.
 
TL4E said:
I'm not saying men are better at science, I'm saying they're more inclined to enter scientific disciplines.
But you were arguing this from a biological point of view, which is what they are asking you to provide evidence for.
 
xelios said:
Also, a shame about the homeschooling thing. They probably won't get a proper education (I'm betting focused on the arts, lack of strong math/science).
I was raised by hippies (it was like being raised by wolves, but with less guidance). For third and fourth grades, I attended a "Free School," where students were allowed to set their own curriculum. If I wanted to read a science book, I was free to do so. If I wanted to study math, I was free to do so. So, I read comic books for two years (when I wasn't eavesdropping on the sixth graders reading Alive by Piers Paul Reid). I think the school eventually got kicked out of the Unitarian Church they used during the week and I had to go to public school for fifth grade. Suddenly, not knowing any math was kind of a bummer, man, and I had to cram two years of study into one summer. I had hair down to my ass, called my mother by her first name, wore overalls until I was a teenager, smoked weed and ate pot brownies, stayed up until I wanted to go to bed, and everyone walked around naked at some point. Fucking hippies. They were uniformly terrible at parenting, and these people might as well have come here in a time machine.
 
TL4E said:
I'm not saying men are better at science, I'm saying they're more inclined to enter scientific disciplines.

Fine, more inclined then - I'm sure they would like to find that out as well.

I am quite interested in how you will create the experiment though - I won't ask until you have conducted your research, cause I know can be a pretty competitive field of study.
 
mods, if you are ever going to lock a thread for something other than being inappropriate, lock this thread.

it's just going to turn into the worst most convoluted soap boxes for pretty much everyone.

EDIT: for everyone. these fucking assholes have hit every demographic
 
Gaborn said:
I'm not sure he'd fit in 100% comfortably with girls either.
Well that's just about everyone. The kid can't live in a bubble forever, and his peers will only become more opinionated and cruel as the years go by. His parents are doing him a great disservice by not forcing him to enroll in school - the sooner the better, really.
 
society is evil

no, society is open

NO

SOCIETY IS EVIL

these parents are fucking stupid attention whores and i hope they die and their kids are placed in the care of people who aren't so infatuated with making news.yahoo.com
 
blame space said:
society is evil

no, society is open

NO

SOCIETY IS EVIL

these parents are fucking stupid attention whores and i hope they die and their kids are placed in the care of people who aren't so infatuated with making news.yahoo.com

Oh wow.
 
blame space said:
these parents are fucking stupid attention whores and i hope they die and their kids are placed in the care of people who aren't so infatuated with making news.yahoo.com
Tell us how you really feel.
 
blame space said:
society is evil

no, society is open

NO

SOCIETY IS EVIL

these parents are fucking stupid attention whores and i hope they die and their kids are placed in the care of people who aren't so infatuated with making news.yahoo.com

Whatever they are doing I don't think it could be worse than the indoctrination that goes on with many of the religious. Probably not smart to experiment with your kids, but let's face it, who doesn't come out a little weird - and if these kids come out okay, or better than okay, maybe their parents are on to something. *shrug*
 
hey maybe becuase society accepts religion to a certain (unfortunate) point, yet someone doesn't accept the fact that your parents chose to use the internet to point out the fact that you are sexually ambiguous
 
From The Dust said:
at what point does a child decide they should start wearing clothes though? in the early years they don't give a shit about wearing anything

No clue why, but this makes me lol.
 
blame space said:
hey maybe becuase society accepts religion to a certain (unfortunate) point, yet someone doesn't accept the fact that your parents chose to use the internet to point out the fact that you are sexually ambiguous

It's not like they're the Westboro Baptist Church or something. geez, parents talk about their kids, shocking events!
 
Gaborn said:
It's not like they're the Westboro Baptist Church or something. geez, parents talk about their kids, shocking events!
i am having a really hard time understanding you

it's probably not your fault
 
blame space said:
i am having a really hard time understanding you

it's probably not your fault

Above you said:
these parents are fucking stupid attention whores and i hope they die and their kids are placed in the care of people who aren't so infatuated with making news.yahoo.com

Then you said

hey maybe becuase society accepts religion to a certain (unfortunate) point, yet someone doesn't accept the fact that your parents chose to use the internet to point out the fact that you are sexually ambiguous

I don't really see how the parents are "attention whores" in the first place. They're raising their kids. The media picked up on it but do you have any evidence that they contacted the media or encouraged them to cover this? It's their kids, and the media is picking up on it NOW, after their THIRD CHILD was born, if they were seeking attention they would have gotten it with their younger kids.

With your point about religion the parents didn't "choose to use the internet to point out that their kids are sexually ambiguous" because in the first place they're not. They may be raised as gender neutral but we have no evidence of them being intersex, in fact the parents said there is nothing wrong there. All they did is email friends and family with the news and not tell them the child's sex. Big fucking deal.

You're acting like they're completely extremists.
 
blame space said:
do you really think there is a person at a news website monitoring the sex of every baby born in canada

i mean, it's fun to think so..

What? I assume a family member or a friend thought it was unusual and told the local press. Most local stories aren't generated by the originator running to the press to show off. And then, because it's interesting the national press picked it up a bit.
 
Gaborn said:
What? I assume a family member or a friend thought it was unusual and told the local press. Most local stories aren't generated by the originator running to the press to show off. And then, because it's interesting the national press picked it up a bit.

i will not rest until i find the source of this wacky and off-beat news article!

EDIT: for the record, fuck everyone involved except the children.
 
they are forcing a counter-culture idea on a kid

its agist, extremist and self-righteous out the ass

you can't have your kid escape from indoctrination, this is just their beliefs transfered onto their children

You can't really raise a kid free of guidance. They will eventually seek it.

This only succeeds in a bubble-boy scenario, where their kids are continually kept out of the greater social context. They are being told how judgmental the world is without being able to witness it first hand.
 
etiolate said:
they are forcing a counter-culture idea on a kid

its agist, extremist and self-righteous out the ass

you can't have your kid escape from indoctrination, this is just their beliefs transfered onto their children

You can't really raise a kid free of guidance. They will eventually seek it.

This only succeeds in a bubble-boy scenario, where their kids are continually kept out of the greater social context. They are being told how judgmental the world is without being able to witness it first hand.

BOOM
 
etiolate said:
they are forcing a counter-culture idea on a kid

its agist, extremist and self-righteous out the ass

you can't have your kid escape from indoctrination, this is just their beliefs transfered onto their children

You can't really raise a kid free of guidance. They will eventually seek it.

This only succeeds in a bubble-boy scenario, where their kids are continually kept out of the greater social context. They are being told how judgmental the world is without being able to witness it first hand.

Not sure I understand: Parents have a right to raise their kids as they see fit within a certain extent of the law. These parents are not breaking the law, these parents are not abusing their children.

If you have no problem with teaching your kid that Santa comes once a year, that Jesus died for the child's sins, that pink is a color for weak people, that girls should be baking, or any other absurd thing parents teach their children, then you should have no problem with what these parents are doing.
 
Skiptastic said:
Don't worry: if the parents don't determine the gender of the child, the kids at school will in short time...

This.
Don't people realize how freaking cruel children are?
 
SmokyDave said:
Jazz doesn't sound very happy and I worry that none of their children will receive an adequate education.

I'm not sure public schooling is quite adequate education either, but at least they would likely get more socialization opportunities there.
 
ivedoneyourmom said:
I'm not sure public schooling is quite adequate education either, but at least they would likely get more socialization opportunities there.

Depends where you live, here it's pretty much the best you can get til you reach college then after graduation it's best in the public then too.

At least twas like that last I checked.
 
Mael said:
Depends where you live, here it's pretty much the best you can get til you reach college then after graduation it's best in the public then too.

At least twas like that last I checked.

True, I imagine Toronto's education isn't all that bad, but I must admit, I don't know much about public schools in Canada.
 
seriously... Who the fuck are you guys to say how a person should raise their children? how many of you even have kids?

I've met some really kick ass people that've been raised in a similar fashion(they were raised in a hippy colony/group farm thing), and they're some of the most well adapted and smartest people I know.

One in particular is doing her masters in architecture.
 
Who cares about the gender stuff, WTF is this:

Both boys are "unschooled," a version of homeschooling, which promotes putting a child's curiosity at the center of his or her education. As Witterick puts it, it's "not something that happens by rote from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. weekdays in a building with a group of same-age people, planned, implemented and assessed by someone else."

When I was a kid I was "curious" about video games, ninja turtles, action movies and softcore cable porn, I would have loved this. I'd also probably be living in a trailer and working a minimum wage job right about now.
 
Devolution said:
But not gender.

Way to miss the point.

They don't want their kids being told what they should like and instead want them to figure it out for themselves.
they'll probably turn out that way anyway, because a huge portion of gender is genetically determined.
see chimpanzee baby studies.
 
Letting your child form its own personal identity is something completely different from not letting it associate a gender or keep it and everyone else in the dark about its own sex.

Even worse is naming your kid something stupid like "Storm".
 
I don't see what not telling the grandparents about your kid's genitalia has to do with whether or not s/he wants to go transsexual later on in life.
 
Devolution said:
But not gender.

Way to miss the point.

They don't want their kids being told what they should like and instead want them to figure it out for themselves.
Kinda iffy since other kids exist. They'll assign a notion of roles regardless.
 
I have to say I agree with Devolution and Gaborn on this. Children are raised as fragile and "stupid" beings who are not able to make their own judgment on things. People don't encourage their kids to be able to learn things on their own. That hardly encourages growth in terms of intellect and personality.

This type of experiment is pretty risky and can go wrong due to how narrow minded society is. But I applaud parents for having the guts to try, as long as they don't keep doing this if it hurts their child in the long run. There is a lot of things we shouldn't have done 50 years ago, but became a norm these days. Things can still change, and some have to take the risk in order for things to improve.

Overall I don't have much faith in people becoming accepting of open gender definitions, but I like seeing that some people are trying to encourage it.

It is ridiculous how people are making fun of the name as if Storm is the most offensive name.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom