• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

PC gaming will never be taken seriously until it fixes the bs

I used to love tinkering with the settings in games just to gain the most of my system, but these days that is not an option anymore. No time and it's a bit cumbersome when I have media center pc's and file servers that require my attention a lot more. Now those are pretty unstable for the average user.
 
I just don't think this kind of thing should be tolerated.

well, imo it should be tolerated, that's the nature of an open platform.
what do you want to do? close and standardize the pc?
you'll get consoles then.

we need an open platform in gaming to drive innovation and ideas,
what do we have left when pc is closed?
android? heh
 
OP is right. It's just the nature of things though. I enjoy PC gaming but there are a lot of little issues that need babysitting. It doesn't benefit anyone to deny this but obviously the industry will continue to try to improve it.
 
I find it funny that some of you guys can write pages of text every day on a gaming forum and yet you aren't willing to put up with slightly more complex set ups and tinkering in order to play those games. If you really can't put down that kind of time, then guess what, it's time to stop being a hardcore gamer altogether. Maybe stick to mobile gaming or something. After all, all games are just time wasters in the end.

Not to mention you have to put up with the same shit with consoles too these days. Regular updates, patches, and mandatory installs are all common features of console gaming these days. How many people remember when PSN was totally down for a month and you had to change your passwords because Sony stored all confidential information in the clear? That was worse than just about any PC gaming problem I ever experienced. Console gaming aren't immune to outright disasters either.
 
The premise of this thread is insane. Does a platform have to be considered 'serious' only when the CoD crowd endorses it? Are consoles not taken seriously because the Moba crowd ignores them? I'm going out on a limb here and saying the last truly 'hardcore' focused games are on PC (and 3DS to an extent), cerebral games that reward creative thinking and have deep mechanics. As a gamer on an enthusiast forum, that shit should be taken seriously, not the latest CoD or cinematic movie game iteration.

Everything you're describing is pretty much a small issue to me, especially what you get in return. And there's benefits like when my 360 red ringed I had no option but to send it back to Microsoft alongside a two week wait, while when my GPU died I swapped it out later that day.
 
The truth is that if publishers took pc gaming seriously, they would be releasing their games on day 1, they wouldn't afford releasing a debug version of Dead Island, putting out a broken version of Rage, or a whole multitude of other games that get treated like shit on pc. Some of you seem to think I'm attacking you guys or something, when I'm in fact a pc gamer first and foremost. I just don't think this kind of thing should be tolerated.

There are big game companies that only release their games on PC. Why the fuck do i have to keep mentioning Blizzard. Holy shit this whole thing is ridiculous.
 
I imagine this has been said several times already, but when you have people of all kinds of different hardware and software setups, some are bound to have issues that others don't. For this reason, PC gaming will never be quite as simple as console gaming. At least not in the foreseeable future.
 
Been there , done that.

Yup, not worth it. I still play some stuff on my PC from time to time, but if i can play it on console i almost always do it that way.
 
Has anyone harped back to the good old days of trying to force the mouse driver into extended memory just so you could have all 640k available to get a game running ?

PC gaming today is a breeze compared to what it used to be. I haven't had to fiddle with ini files or disable a keyboard driver (WTF ?) to get a game running. I have found 90% of the time it is just a case of buy game from steam, download game from steam and play game.

Now having said that there are always going to be some problems with some games on some hardware. The PC platform is a an amazingly complicated ecosystem there is no other platform like it. There are hundreds of companies all supply thousands of PC parts for people to choose from. If you actually think for a second it is nigh on a bloody miracle that you can slap a CPU from Intel onto a motherboard from Asus using RAM from Kingston and use a GPU from Gigabyte to run games from a harddisc made by Seagate. As such there will always be some "teething" troubles with some games on the PC platform, it is unavoidable.
 
I've been gaming on pc for almost two decades now, and it's a lot - a lot - better than it once was. Memory management in DOS was something you could legitimately state as scaring people away for being too daunting. Compare that to, say, installing a new driver to make a new game work properly, and you see how far we've come. IRQ interrupts? Man, you don't even want to know. Sound card standards, ISA ports, VESA, blargh... when people complain of pc gaming being too difficult these days I can't help but scoff.

You don't know what difficult is.

Things have gotten so much better and will continue to do so. There will always be that element of tinkering to get things going or making a game look better, and some people see that as a strength of the platform, not a weakness. If you can't handle it, there are always the consoles.
 
Has anyone harped back to the good old days of trying to force the mouse driver into extended memory just so you could have all 640k available to get a game running ?

PC gaming today is a breeze compared to what it used to be. I haven't had to fiddle with ini files or disable a keyboard driver (WTF ?) to get a game running. I have found 90% of the time it is just a case of buy game from steam, download game from steam and play game.

Too true I remember having to use bootdisk to make dos based games easier. What we do now is nothing in comparison to what old pcs or what pc like consoles required to play things right.
 
It's been such a struggle to be a PC gamer. First, I had to connect my computer to my TV with a HDMI cable. Then I had to plug in a controller. Totally unlike the console experience where I had to plug in a HDMI cable and then plug in a controller.
 
Core 2 quad with a 5850. I can't remember the last time I spent more than a couple of min tweaking settings on initial load up. The subsequent faster load ups(delete those unskippable adverts that start console versions) and better performance more than makes up for the min I spent dictating settings initially. Do I get the absolute most out of my hardware? No..but I get magnitudes better than console performance for minimal effort. Heck, I haven't even updated my graphics drivers since last year.
 
I love threads like these.. console gamers love to over exaggerate shit so much its insane. Price, upgrading and tinkering.. top things they blow way out of proportion. Yet I spend less money on PC thanks to great deals, I rarely upgrade (maybe every 4 years) and tinkering is mostly a choice rather than a need. I love tinkering but its usually when I want to customize something. Its great I have the damn choice unlike console gaming.

Wtf when did you have to download a .dll file btw?! lol
 
Thank you, I'm getting kind of tired of this misconception that not wanting to spend time fixing issues means we're somehow computer illiterate. It's not about the issues being hard to fix, it's about me not wanting to spend time fixing issues, when I'd rather spend time playing games.

And lets just give a generous number that only 5-10% of games we'll ever have issues, why is that still acceptable? And even if a game doesn't have a specific issue, you still have windows to deal with. It's why until the promise of a steam os comes to fruition, pc gaming will never be the money grabbing mainstream success of consoles. Games like Dota and LoL does not put pc gaming in the same mainstream awareness spotlight of consoles, it just doesn't. My dude bro friends will never be interested in getting themselves gaming pc's, and it's not because they are more expensive. They know about using controllers and are perfectly capable of connecting a pc to their hdtv just like they would a console. It's the back end to pc gaming that keeps them away, I don't understand why some of you don't see this.

The truth is that if publishers took pc gaming seriously, they would be releasing their games on day 1, they wouldn't afford releasing a debug version of Dead Island, putting out a broken version of Rage, or a whole multitude of other games that get treated like shit on pc. Some of you seem to think I'm attacking you guys or something, when I'm in fact a pc gamer first and foremost. I just don't think this kind of thing should be tolerated.

Dudebros wouldn't get a PC, period. Because a. It's not a cool system to them and b. The games are too complicated.

All they need is Madden and COD and they're set.
 
I love threads like these.. console gamers love to over exaggerate shit so much its insane. Price, upgrading and tinkering.. top things they blow way out of proportion. Yet I spend less money on PC thanks to great deals, I rarely upgrade (maybe every 4 years) and tinkering is mostly a choice rather than a need. I love tinkering but its usually when I want to customize something. Its great I have the damn choice unlike console gaming.

Wtf when did you have to download a .dll file btw?! lol

It was 2003. I was a young man, more a boy, truth be told. It was autumn, with all that season implies. The game? Its name is lost to to the ether. But I remember the search well.
 
I love threads like these.. console gamers love to over exaggerate shit so much its insane. Price, upgrading and tinkering.. top things they blow way out of proportion. Yet I spend less money on PC thanks to great deals, I rarely upgrade (maybe every 4 years) and tinkering is mostly a choice rather than a need. I love tinkering but its usually when I want to customize something. Its great I have the damn choice unlike console gaming.

Wtf when did you have to download a .dll file btw?! lol

That's the same case for me. Meanwhile I see console users asking for v-sync toggles and frame-rate locks for their games in others threads. More options are better than less options.
 
I'm with you mate. I'm still living with it 'coz I want good frame rates and stuff, but the moment I have to get my keyboard out when I'm already in bed holding a controller just sucks.

Valve can only do so much to bring the benefits of consoles to PC. Devs have to make their games properly.

I don't think The Walking Dead ever ran for me without bug fixing it myself. Hotline Miami was terrible at launch and even the newer build now still required me to run a certain buried file.

It disgusted me that Walking Dead won all these awards despite never working. Around GOTY time it wasn't even released in Australia for 360 and I believe that version sucked too. Even the disc version was busted!
 
Dudebros wouldn't get a PC, period. Because a. It's not a cool system to them and b. The games are too complicated.

All they need is Madden and COD and they're set.

If turning a PC into a console means mainly shootang games like CoD, Killzone and Halo saturate the market and force out other genres, then fuck that.

Give me stuff with actual depth, like the trend is now.

It disgusted me that Walking Dead won all these awards despite never working. Around GOTY time it wasn't even released in Australia for 360 and I believe that version sucked too. Even the disc version was busted!

All versions sucked technically, with stuttering issues, freezes and deleted game saves. At least you had the option to fix it on PC.
 
No... Its a different audience. See: Diablo 3 sales on PC vs, console, or Left 4 Dead's success on console... So I guess you're just another poster claiming that if GTA sells less on PC then the whole platform is smaller than a given console?

Come on. Usse your head. There are regions where consoles have no presence. Zero.
Call Of Duty
 
If turning a PC into a console means mainly shootang games like CoD, Killzone and Halo saturate the market and force out other genres, then fuck that.

Give me stuff with actual depth, like the trend is now.
Actually I'd love more dudebros buying PCs because it might make playing Counter-Strike GO, Call Of Duty Ghosts and Battlefield 4 with a controller a little more even.
 
It's why until the promise of a steam os comes to fruition, pc gaming will never be the money grabbing mainstream success of consoles.
I am so hopeful for SteamOS. It seems like it could really be a nice way for self-assembled hardware to become *nice* for PC gaming.

A kernel, and a standard set of libraries included. Stick to a single kernel version and a specific set of options, and only upgrade that every 2-3 years.

All games should statically compile past this. They shouldn't have a complex dependency chain.

Let it be an easily breakable walled garden, but make it possible to work without doing so. Make "desktop" a downloadable title and have that set up a launchable XFCE. Include a browser (Chrome and Firefox?) and Libreoffice or similar with that. That and a Terminal are all I need to work 99% of the time. I guess add VLC on top of that for those that like to work from their desks.

Add XBMC as an installable (I bet the XBMC people would even make an official version), and all that plus the other Steam bits and pieces, and you really can end up with a very simple OS (2gig maybe?) that supports just enough to get games up and running.

ChromeOS almost had it, but it's still just a little bit too walled for the likes of me.
 
OP is exactly how I feel about PC gaming. Its a pain to use a PC as your main platform because it doesn't "just work". There's always fiddling to do...and certain games refuse to play or have one off issues with your gpu and stuff like that. It's just annoying as hell.
 
I've been primarily a pc gamer for about three years now, and while it was awesome in the beginning to be able to play games at 1080p/60 frames a second. My tolerance for the level of bullshit I have to put up with has about run its course. It's not the price of entry, the mouse and keyboard, or playing games at a desk; those issues have already been addressed and largely fixed. It's the constant pc tinkering and general clunkyness that keeps people from pc gaming.

Disabling a keyboard driver to get a game to work, editing ini files and replacing .dll files on a regular basis, certain settings like DX11 or physx breaking a game, windows updates interfering with your game in the middle of a session, limiting certain games to two cores so they don't crash every 10 minutes, poor optimization, games being broken at launch, shitty 3rd party drm, and a whole bunch of other crap that is still common place and shouldn't be tolerated.

I love this post so much. It's exactly why I don't play games on the PC unless there is an enormous, experience-changing difference between it and the console version (etc. Dark Souls DSfix).
 
No. It's not even advertised as such. As someone else pointed out, its niche in the same way a mod chip for a console is. It isn't considered at all by many developers. It isn't really supposed to be, although that would be nice if it was. It's not plugging in a peripheral, it's a mod you can but maybe shouldn't do, much like overclocking or any other unorthodox techniques that have software support from vendors like AMD but only with an AT YOUR OWN RISK asterisk.

If you're running crossfire, or overclocking like the OP, yet expressing frustration over things not "just working", problems with crashing, etc. I don't know what to say. I'm sorry you hit the nitrous button and blew off a chunk of your car. Maybe don't put that in in the first place?
Where are all these warnings and asterisks and AT YOUR OWN RISK signs and portends you're talking about? Crossfire has always been sold as a performance enhancement for games.

From day one it was a way for me to get 3 HDMI connections and a performance boost in supported games.

And yes, it should just work.

Edit: Also, looking back in time it was exactly that crossfire setup that was recommended to me from PC GAF, who I asked in advance of buying my rig. There were no warnings or tales of woe in that thread either.
 
It was 2003. I was a young man, more a boy, truth be told. It was autumn, with all that season implies. The game? Its name is lost to to the ether. But I remember the search well.

I love how he says he has to do these things regularly?!?

Seriously I cannot think of any of things things he mentioned where I had to do it regularly.

Disabling a keyboard driver to get a game to work

Ive never had to do this ever..

editing ini files and replacing .dll files
I feel like the only game Ive done this in the past 10 years was Dark Souls which was the developers fault not PC gaming.. plus its great I had that option. You dont "have" to use that fix. It still runs and looks better than the console version.

DX11 or physx breaking a game
I swear this shit is always off by default and usually is a single button in the options of most games..

limiting certain games to two cores so they don't crash every 10 minutes
Honestly cant think of this ever happening to me..

poor optimization,games being broken at launch
This isnt just a PC problem.. and honestly is the number one thing I check for in reviews. You cant handle developers being lazy no matter what the platform is. Just dont buy their damn games.

shitty 3rd party drm

Probably the only thing I agree with yet.. it almost never ever effects me. Usually its just the idea that its there that bugs me, yet I never notice it. Even GFWL, never gave me an issue but yeah I am glad its gone still.

Anyways yeah I just feel like you and many others are over exaggerating with this stuff..
 
OP is exactly how I feel about PC gaming. Its a pain to use a PC as your main platform because it doesn't "just work". There's always fiddling to do...and certain games refuse to play or have one off issues with your gpu and stuff like that. It's just annoying as hell.

I've never run into any of those issues and my PC is my main platform. I'm not saying they don't exist (especially if you're using a shitty laptop or prebuilt Dell), but it's not always the case. As in stands now PC gaming is more convenient than gaming on my consoles.

Steam box is never happening. Steam machines are NOT the same.

It's a big step in that direction, it's down to how Valve handles their software and what partners they get.
 
I love this post so much. It's exactly why I don't play games on the PC unless there is an enormous, experience-changing difference between it and the console version (etc. Dark Souls DSfix).

What are you saying? That's pretty much the typical difference between multiplatform games on consoles and on PC: higher frame-rate and higher resolution. Dark Souls is far from the only PC version of a game to do this. That's a terrible example of "experience-changing" unless you value image quality and fps to a great degree, in which case you would be playing lots of games on PC... I'm really confused lol
 
Steam box is never happening. Steam machines are NOT the same.

What does this even mean? Steam box is Steam Machines.. its just a better name due to obviously not being a single device. Which honestly is exactly what they said from day one people just kept acting like it was some console when really it is a PC with a unique console like OS.
 
This thread reminds me of my own experiences of hunting for game fixes on google.

"anyone else getting error 0x01234?"
"nvm i fixed it"

There are few things in this world more infuriating.
 
This thread reminds me of my own experiences of hunting for game fixes on google.

"anyone else getting error 0x01234?"
"nvm i fixed it"

There are few things in this world more infuriating.
wisdom_of_the_ancients.png
 
Agreed with you Crafty, PC gaming is becoming a joke for me for the very reasons you listed in the OP.

Barely any Rockstar game works for me the way i want it unless i am downloading cracks to fix my legitimate purchases, editing .ini files or having to gimp my game or system to run said game.

What pisses me off Valve actually still allows games to be sold in broken states all the time. It makes me wish they took on Sonys and Microsofts level of console QC and approval process when putting games on their service.
 
I am so hopeful for SteamOS. It seems like it could really be a nice way for self-assembled hardware to become *nice* for PC gaming.

A kernel, and a standard set of libraries included. Stick to a single kernel version and a specific set of options, and only upgrade that every 2-3 years.

The Linux kernel has a policy of not breaking userspace, no reason not to keep it pretty up to date.
 
This thread reminds me of my own experiences of hunting for game fixes on google.

"anyone else getting error 0x01234?"
"nvm i fixed it"

There are few things in this world more infuriating.

wisdom_of_the_ancients.png


We all know this pain.

Edit - Dammit to all hell!
 
It makes me wish they took on Sonys and Microsofts level of console QC and approval process when putting games on their service.

Fuck that. The best things about PC games is that they're extremely ambitious, even at the expense of polish and bugs. We never would have gotten Stalker, ArmA, Europa Universalis III or X3 etc if we had that rigid system on the platform. It'll just be another step towards homogenizing games like what the consoles are striving towards.
 
I agree with OP. I had to hack into the GUI interface using a Linux shell that I routed through the network server hosted in Nicaragua just to get Doom 3 to run.
 
The advantages and customization of PC gaming comes at a price. It's up to you whether it's worth it to lose some simplicity to gain a far improved and tailored experience.

The idea that they are not 'taken seriously' is laughable though. Some of the biggest games today are PC only.
 
I got horrible hitching and freeze-ups on walking dead PS3 version. There's nothing I can do about it. I should start making generalizations too... (console gaming will never be taken seriously until it fixes this closed system bs.)
 
I agree with OP. I had to hack into the GUI interface using a Linux shell that I routed through the network server hosted in Nicaragua just to get Doom 3 to run.

Funny and all that, but looking at the types of replies here I'm sure those people will miss the sarcasm.

I got horrible hitching and freeze-ups on walking dead PS3 version. There's nothing I can do about it. I should start making generalizations too... (console gaming will never be taken seriously until it fixes this closed system bs.)

It's like when my 360 started freezing and acting up I had to wait a few weeks for the Microsoft 'engineers' to fix it, meanwhile my dieing GPU was fixed by me in an hour. Closed platforms also come with a price.
 
Like people have already said, tinkering is a choice and not a need. I hate it when people put down pc gaming because it "requires a lot of tinkering".
 
Like people have already said, tinkering is a choice and not a need. I hate it when people put down pc gaming because it "requires a lot of tinkering".

Okay, please get my copy of Tiny and Big to work on my new PC by hitting the "Play" button. I must be doing it wrong.
 
I've had some problems in the past; however, nothing game breaking.

I enjoy tinkering from time to time it's a freedom console users don't have. I'm mainly a console user btw, steam is starting to make me move though.
 
Fuck that. The best things about PC games is that they're extremely ambitious, even at the expense of polish and bugs. We never would have gotten Stalker, ArmA, Europa Universalis III or X3 etc if we had that rigid system on the platform. It'll just be another step towards homogenizing games like what the consoles are striving towards.

yeah, this!
why do people want to close the system?
as I've said, we need an open platform,
you kill an open platform and you end up losing a ton of innovation and ideas.
 
We can only hope that one day Valve will take PC gaming seriously enough to make that Steam service they have been talking about.
 
PC gaming is bigger than console gaming. Has been for years. Get over it. Why are people so afraid to admit that PC gaming is amazing? It really is a total blast and fixes a lot of the downsides of console gaming.

I enjoy them both immensely. Why can't you?

I can also ask the same about consoles. Is a closed system so bad? I'm pretty tired of the shitting on both sides, as someone who games on both PC and consoles like you. Also the elitism and defensive insults brought out by some people in this thread is fucking sad.

I have no stake in whether it's taken seriously or becomes mainstream. I'd be happy if it never did :) Those people can have consoles lol.

console gen is stagnating, people get on the pc bandwagon, because "60 fps + HD". next gen is around the corner, same people who didn't learn a thing about pc gaming get off the bandwagon and start making these threads. Good riddance.

This sums up my thoughts exactly. Console gaming is there for those that don't want to have to think.

One of the downsides of the proliferation of technology is it results in generations of people who don't even know how the things they use work. Don't blame the device.

I for one at least got what the OP was trying to convey, if haphazardly and not without overexaggerating and causing a lot of people to put up their guard.

So because I don't look the other way and pretend pc's don't have issues, than I'm not a real pc gamer? That's as bad as saying someone who criticizes the government is unpatriotic.

Here's my steam profile
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198026917599/

And I hardly touch my consoles any more. If that doesn't make me a pc gamer first and foremost, than I don't know what does. Just because I think pc gaming has a lot of issues to fix doesn't mean I don't enjoy pc gaming. That's something a lot of people in this thread can't seem to wrap their head around.

Edit: Also if many of you don't have issues, than I'm proud of you. Good job, doesn't mean it's something that should just be scoffed at however, because many of us, for whatever reason, seem to have much worse luck than some of you. All I wish for is that someday "luck" not factor into whether a game is broken or not. Hopefully steam os can fix this.

EDIT: although OP, I disagree that PC gaming is not taken seriously. At least in the MMO realm.
 
I think the irony of this thread is that I've had to do far more of this dumb editing and updating to my PS3 games than I've ever had to do for my PC games in a long, long time, unless we're talking about emulation or games from 10+ years ago (though the fact that I can play games from 10+ years ago is what makes me a for-life PC gamer).

As for PC gaming not being taken seriously, PC gaming is the biggest market for videogames, and to me makes that argument silly. If it's not being taken seriously, there sure are a lot of really dumb people out there. Or maybe there's actually a lot of money in the PC gaming market and it's taken very seriously. Just a thought.
 
Top Bottom