• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

People who value dog's life over a human life

Status
Not open for further replies.
Then I feel sorry for you. Next time you are sick and your dog comes up to you and licks your face tell the dog they are just a fucking dog and to leave you alone.

awwwwwweeeee.. when the dog licked your face did it make you feel better? Did the dog's saliva cure you?
 
No, a dog is only going to be a pet. You want to call it a personal friend or whatever... that's on you. I've yet to see my dog drive my injured ass to work after I got hurt. I love him, but he's just a fucking a dog. Just a pet. That's it.

Sounds to me that you have to high expectations from your dog to drive you to the hospital.
 
You people want to call dogs friends - and that's nice. That's cute.

But my friends drove 200+ miles to come and see me when I had my shoulder shattered. That's what I call a friend. My dog, yes, he licked my foot, because he's awesome. But that is all he can fucking do because he is a dog.

"That's cute".
 
All selfish notions aside... If you'd put the value of a dog over that of another human, then wow.

I'm not going to presume to know you or your values but chances are that you value human life very little. None of us do. I mean, we do, but we also have a huge blindspot for human suffering. The clothes you're wearing, the electronics you use, the billions of starving people around the world etc. All of these things should bother us more but they don't.

I tried to think about it and I honestly don't know what I'd do in a hypothetical situation where it's my dog vs. stranger.
 
You said a pet is just a pet so I compared 2 pets I have had. It isn't a reach, it is just you lacking the understanding that for some people, a dog is more than a pet. For others a cat is more than a pet. There are some people who also probably think of birds as more of a pet.

You can have your comparison, they are both pets. You just put more value on one pet than the other pet, just like I put more value on some of my possessions than other possessions.
 
No, that's all a dog is.

And pets are great. They're awesome. But a pet is just a pet. And that's all a dog can be.

Dogs can be feral too. They're not putting on a show of pain and fear for our benefit, those experiences really do exist in their little minds and it shouldn't be ok to abuse them.


If we're judging lives by what they can potentially provide for you or others, then a dog will hardly come top. Unless it's something like working police dog vs. crazed killer with a gun.
 
So if animal rights are utterly unimportant, we should basically abandon all animal cruelty laws? Dogfighting isn't that bad compared to all the homeless people starving and freezing, so let's go.

Crazy idea: if we can work on gay rights in the US and basic human rights in India at the same time, maybe we can work a bit on animal rights too? Holy shit, I know.

Also, most people are not working on ANY rights for ANYONE. You may think it's more important to help people in India, but if these persons either help animals or no-one, surely it's better than nothing, no?
I never said animal rights are "utterly unimportant" or that we should "abandon all animal cruelty laws". Stop putting words in my mouth. I said that I love animals. I just don't think we can really make huge strides until bigger human issues are dealt with. We can work on them a little but I don't think many people will be able to handle huge change on the animal rights front until we face issues that are a much bigger deal to the people we know and love as opposed to the animals we know and love.
 
You people want to call dogs friends - and that's nice. That's cute.

But my friends drove 200+ miles to come and see me when I had my shoulder shattered. That's what I call a friend. My dog, yes, he licked my foot, because he's awesome. But that is all he can fucking do because he is a dog.

So basically... because a dog is less capable than a human, it should be less valued. As somebody said, dogs love you enough that if they COULD travel across the country to see you in a bad situation, they would. But he's a dog, so he can't. Yet, there are plenty of people who also couldn't, so by that argument, they end up on the same level as the dog.

See what happens when you try to cynically boil relationships down to who loves who more? Some people value pets as much as people in terms of friendship, and to denigrate that because it doesn't apply to your personal situation makes you sound like an asshole.
 
But my friends drove 200+ miles to come and see me when I had my shoulder shattered. That's what I call a friend.

I'd save my friends over your friends.
They would say: "We drove 200+ miles when our friend shattered his shoulder"
I'd say: "Hey Paul, grab Lady and lets go!"
And she would wiggle her tiny tail.
 
All this thread is convincing me of is that people have some deep rooted social issues.
 
And people don't do the same shit for other people?

lol


LOL

Do they? Remember that girl in China?

By the way, how does saying people do it too counteract the argument? You think because we already have people helping people and being nice to people, dogs doing the same are useless and should just be exterminated?
 
Hopefully all you pet over human people never need help from one of your kind.

It's going to be a sad day for your family. Look on the bright side, someone gets to keep their pet...
 
I'd save my friends over your friends.
They would say: "We drove 200+ miles when our friend shattered his shoulder"
I'd say: "Hey Paul, grab Lady and lets go!"
And she would wiggle her tiny tail.

Because is a pack animal that 'loves you unconditionally'.

A dog is a dog. When people make sacrifices, leave work, use their hard earned money to make sure that you're okay - it means a lot more than someone licking my face.

But if that is weighted the same to you. Cool. Have fun with your dog for all of 12 years.
 
All this thread is convincing me of is that people have some deep rooted social issues.

But why is having a connection with a dog where you value that connection over others a "deep rooted social issue"? When my dog dies of cancer it hit me harder than that of one of my grandparents passing. To you this must seem like i am insane but it is the truth as I had more of a connection with my dog than I had with my grand parent.
 
If I saw an injured dog next to an injured person I would help the person first. I love animals and all but a humans life is more important.
 
I'm not going to respond to a blatant attempt to troll me.

Micheal Vick's crime was FARRR more heinous. Thats the extent that I will go in responding to that.

LOL, ok buddy. You can keep living in your fantasy world where you have no way to justify your ridiculous arguments that you just call other people trolls when you are totally called out and you have no way to counter it. This whole thread is nothing more than something to get a rise out of people which is exactly what you got. Good job man.
 
Hopefully all you pet over human people never need help from one of your kind.

I swear on my life that if the 0.00000000005% chance there was ever a situation where someone had the chance of either saving their dog or me, and they saved their dog. I would understand. I would feel like shit obviously, but I wouldn't harbor ill feelings toward him.

Because is a pack animal that 'loves you unconditionally'.

A dog is a dog. When people make sacrifices, leave work, use their hard earned money to make sure that you're okay - it means a lot more than someone licking my face.

But if that is weighted the same to you. Cool. Have fun with your dog for all of 12 years.

Going to keep dodging the question? K9 dog or Charles Manson, who do you save?
 
By the way, how does saying people do it too counteract the argument? You think because we already have people helping people and being nice to people, dogs doing the same are useless and should just be exterminated?

It a moot point because they brought up "dogs help people!" - well people help people too. A lot more.
Would you save a K9 dog or Charles Manson?

Arguing for dummies.

"Would save X or WorstcaseimaginableY? HMMMM?"
 
LOL, ok buddy. You can keep living in your fantasy world where you have no way to justify your ridiculous arguments that you just call other people trolls when you are totally called out and you have no way to counter it. This whole thread is nothing more than something to get a rise out of people which is exactly what you got. Good job man.

But I responded... I said it was more heinous. What? Seems like you are trying to get a rise out of me... I was not trying to get a rise out of anybody. It was a legit thread.


I swear on my life that if the 0.00000000005% chance there was ever a situation where someone had the chance of either saving their dog or me, and they saved their dog. I would understand. I would feel like shit obviously, but I wouldn't harbor ill feelings toward him.
Yeah because you would be dead.
 
Because is a pack animal that 'loves you unconditionally'.

A dog is a dog. When people make sacrifices, leave work, use their hard earned money to make sure that you're okay - it means a lot more than someone licking my face.

But if that is weighted the same to you. Cool. Have fun with your dog for all of 12 years.

Humans can also *gasp* fuck you over, too! Sure, human relationships are more complex; nobody here is denying that. But that means that relationships with other human beings entail plenty of negative emotions as well, whereas a relationship with a dog is pretty much nothing but pure happiness. It's not a "deep-rooted social issue" but a logical outcropping of the emotional relationships that a person has had.
 
They both suck. I won't play your game. My dog is dead now, but when she was alive I certainly valued her life against most humans. Outside of family/close friends and children, if it was my dog's life against someone else's, that person is probably fucked.

Fortunately that type of situation will never happen.

Hopefully all you pet over human people never need help from one of your kind.

It's going to be a sad day for your family. Look on the bright side, someone gets to keep their pet...

Yeah it would suck, but I can't really be to pissed at someone who would act the same way I would. Some would call that poetic justice.
 
Arguing for dummies.

"Would save X or WorstcaseimaginableY? HMMMM?"

I have a larger point to make, but it requires you answer the question first.

Who would you save? K9 dog or Charles Manson? It's a simple question which one? I can answer it very easily so should you.

Yeah because you would be dead.

Except the moment before death when I see him save the dog first, which is what we're talking about...
 
Hopefully all you pet over human people never need help from one of your kind.

It's going to be a sad day for your family. Look on the bright side, someone gets to keep their pet...

You can take comfort in the fact that it's extremely unlikely anyone in this thread will find themselves in a situation where they're forced to choose between a strangers life and their dogs.

Here's something just as unlikely:

If you could only save one who would you save?

Your girlfriend/boyfriend/wife/husband/mother/father/whatever, or a doctor on the verge of curing all forms of cancer. Only he alone can complete this cure, if he dies the cure is gone.

Hypotheticals are fun.
 
But why is having a connection with a dog where you value that connection over others a "deep rooted social issue"? When my dog dies of cancer it hit me harder than that of one of my grandparents passing. To you this must seem like i am insane but it is the truth as I had more of a connection with my dog than I had with my grand parent.

I think that everyone has deep rooted social issues and not only the dog owners that would save their pet in front of a stranger
 
I have a larger point to make, but it requires you answer the question first.

Who would you save? K9 dog or Charles Manson? It's a simple question which one? I can answer it very easily so should you.



Except the moment before death when I see him save the dog first, which is what we're talking about...

Few people would want to save Manson, period.
 
I have a larger point to make, but it requires you answer the question first.

Who would you save? K9 dog or Charles Manson? It's a simple question which one? I can answer it very easily so should you.]
lol kid

you can blow that little "SO YOU HATE AMERRICUH?" shit out your ass.

Do you see any of the "people > dogs" people bringing up cases where dog maims a baby? No. Same fucking case. Save it. And learn what describes the shitty point you're trying to make.
 
But why is having a connection with a dog where you value that connection over others a "deep rooted social issue"? When my dog dies of cancer it hit me harder than that of one of my grandparents passing. To you this must seem like i am insane but it is the truth as I had more of a connection with my dog than I had with my grand parent.

I had the same thing occur in my life. My dog died of cancer and my Grandpa died of other causes. I was never close to my GP and very close to my dog. I grew up with that dog. While the dogs death might have affected me more emotionally than my GP I am still able to see the pain the my GP death caused my dad and his family and that by no means is my dogs life worth the same value. Seems this topic is basically boiling down to how selfish a person is.
 
I personally think the Vick thing was a bit overblown. Yea, he damn sure fucked up. But he's also paid his debt to society and has shown remorse for his actions. The rampant hate that the man continues to get is beyond me.

I say this from the perspective that a dogs life isn't as valuable as a humans. As far as Chris Brown...he seems to still be acting like a whiny bitch. But Rihanna seems to have forgiven him and put it past them....so it is what it is.

I think there are MUCH worse people for us to be focusing on rather than these two.
 
Few people would want to save Manson, period.

I want to see him say that and accept that so I can continue that's all.

lol kid

you can blow that little "SO YOU HATE AMERRICUH?" shit out your ass.

Do you see any of the "people > dogs" people bringing up cases where dog maims a baby? No. Same fucking case. Save it. And learn what describes the shitty point you're trying to make.

So you're not going to answer? Why not? It's really a simple question I don't see the big deal.
 
lol kid

you can blow that little "SO YOU HATE AMERRICUH?" shit out your ass.

Do you see any of the "people > dogs" people bringing up cases where dog maims a baby? No. Same fucking case. Save it. And learn what describes the shitty point you're trying to make.

You're coming off like a condescending asshole with no empathy for anybody who doesn't share your worldview with regards to the "animals vs. people" question.

Yet thus far, in this thread, humans must necessarily be valued more highly... just because they're a human, and if you don't agree, then you have deeply rooted social issues.
 
But why is having a connection with a dog where you value that connection over others a "deep rooted social issue"? When my dog dies of cancer it hit me harder than that of one of my grandparents passing. To you this must seem like i am insane but it is the truth as I had more of a connection with my dog than I had with my grand parent.

It means you have deep rooted social issues because of your hideously insular worldview, lack of empathy, lack of moral regard toward members of your community, and a twisted logic as to the intrinsic value of the things around you. The hurt you felt when your dog died is probably not one tenth of what someone would feel if their close family member died. And yet you're so selfish that you would actively spare yourself some little hurt at the expense of another human being who would feel so much more. The only thing that concerns you, by your own admission, is how you yourself felt. That's the whole crux of the issue.

Some in this thread claim that others are sociopaths because they say "you can just get a new dog." They know that you can't just replace it, but they know the full breadth and depth of human suffering when it comes to the loss of a loved one. They know that an animal, simple and of basic intelligence isn't capable of the same kind of achievement or development of relationships that humans are capable of. People who say that humans don't have more value than other animals are also objectively wrong. In reality, nature is dictated by the principle of the survival of the fittest, and there is intrinsic value in being the fittest despite whether or not it fits in your simplistic worldview. Humans aren't just the top of the food chain, they are the only species, perhaps in the entire universe, capable of progressing socially and technologically and they deserve their position on the pedestal.
 
So you're not going to answer? Why not? It's really a simple question I don't see the big deal.
Do you know what its called when you go from X vs Y to "well, what about X vs worstcaseimaginableY?"

Do you know what it makes you look like?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom