I don't think he has ever said why the number six. These were his reasons (taken from this previous thread):
This guy doesn't understand the purpose of the Senate. The House of Representatives is for population.1. It is about time California was properly represented with Senators in Washington. Now our number of Senators per person will be about average.
Could we get 2 Washingtons while we're at it? The line draws itself.
I live in Silicon Valley, and everyone I meet is pretty consistently liberal. Plus the area consistently votes Democrat, unlike orange county.
Are you sure you're not just talking about Sand Hill Road in Palo Alto?
All I see are three new blue states, three new red states, and one delusional venture capitalist.
This guy doesn't understand the purpose of the Senate. The House of Representatives is for population.
In a way it does make sense. The governor of that state has more responsibility than most presidents.
edit: The electoral college may have to be thrown out if this were actually done. State lines would be drawn around voter registration, and that would change every presidential election.
Canada's provinces are largely barren wastelands. Pennsylvania already matches the population of Canada's most populous province, and New York is 1.5x its population.
New Jersey has a million more people than Canada's second most populous province. New Jersey.
Actually, what would happen to the California state schools?
This guy is completely delusional. You can't just internally declare yourself a smaller state.
Nothing, the idea is beyond untenable. Its like asking what would happen if the US were to invade and seize Switzerland. California can't unilaterally declare itself a different state.
California-GAF, which one is going to be the good one to live in?
How about instead of splitting California we just combine a bunch of the Northeastern states into one large state. Our states should become closer to the size of Canada's provinces.
Just split it into NorCal and SoCal.
Top California, Bottom California, Up California, Down California, Charm California, Strange California.North California, South California, East California, West California, Left California, Right California.
I needed somewhere neutral and semi-random for my example. :lolHey now, what did we do to deserve this.
The parts of California with people in them are all democrat controlled. It would be a net loss in Senators and no gain in the House since the districts would be roughly the same as they are now.The GOP would love this.
A venture capitalist who feels colossal California is too unwieldy to govern
This guy doesn't understand the purpose of the Senate. The House of Representatives is for population.
I live here as well and spent another portion of my life in Orange County.
I'm referring to both Silicon Valley and Orange County's tendencies to perceive themselves as a persecuted City on a Hill, being held back by the rest of the state/country. Both areas are cultural and sociopolitical bubbles in suburbia sprawl, with a sense of being separate from and above the rest of the state.
I know I'm painting with broad strokes here, but frankly this is the image defined by the most vocal and powerful elements of both areas: the moneyed, conservative high-society circles of OC and the corporate libertarian/technocrats from tech and VC sectors of Silicon valley.
Just split it into NorCal and SoCal.
Out of interest, how were the size of the states formed? Did someone get a map of America, and using a ruler just drew a few lines and was like, yeah that'll do? It's weird seeing the country split with straight lines.
There's someone whose job it is to approve or disapprove of petitions?
I want that job.
We could always secede from the Union and form the Confederate States of California.
I feel like this will cause further polarization. What's to stop NYC and Chicago from becoming City-States? States should have a blend of ideologies to moderate the extremes.
This sounds like a ridiculous right-wing plan to somehow get parts of California back into the red column during national elections.
"Only people". That's a lot of people, unless you're on GAF. But I imagine they wouldn't actually want this due to the Senate tipping very heavily in the Democrats favor I would have to imagine. Two states make more sense for them I would think.The only people who want this is the GOP. They want to split the votes to prevent the entire state from always going democrat.