Messypandas
Member
Norton and Howard need to start the Loser Avengers
Yes. My only problem with the Avengers was that it didn't have Norton. TIH was my second favorite of Phase 1, right behind Captain America.I feel the opposite. I really liked Norton's Banner, I don't really like Ruffalo's.
Didn't Norton rejected to continue his role as Banner/Hulk because in his words "I have better jobs to do", or something like that?
Didn't Norton rejected to continue his role as Banner/Hulk because in his words "I have better jobs to do", or something like that?
is'nt Ruffalo talking about leaving the hulk?
Well that's a shame. Would explain why I haven't really seen him in anything recently despite his obvious talent. I rather enjoyed his version of Banner/Hulk, but agree that Rufallo did a great job in Avengers; and there's no doubt his face translates quite well to the CG Hulk.
Bana and Norton Hulks are not meant to be relatedI never did see either Hulk movies but I'm confused. I thought Bruce Banner was played by Eric Bana in that first Hulk movie and then Ruffalo played Banner in the second Hulk movie as well as The Avengers. Or did Ruffalo exclusively play Banner in The Avengers.
I liked bana the most
He hasn't even done a solo movie yet, what's there to leave?
This is news to me. Details?
He hasn't even done a solo movie yet, what's there to leave?
Thanks for confusing me more.Bana and Norton Hulks are not meant to be related
ang lees hulk was better, hated edward and his version
He sits in the editing room and over rules director's choices to make himself look better on screen. I think he may also do things like save his best work for closeups and stuff like that. The things he does to put on amazing performances piss off the people he works with.This is news to me. Details?
oh thats old. unless the negotiations are final then i remember this being talked about like last month. but then again it could just be a rumor. people sparked one up about Chris Evans leaving Captain America
Norton/2008 is part of MCU. Tony Stark and the Super Soldier formula appear in it.Thanks for confusing me more.
It still doesn't answer my question. The first Hulk movie (2003) was with Bana. I thought the second movie Incredible Hulk (2008) starred Ruffalo but I guess it was Norton. So, Ruffalo was exclusively cast for Banner in The Avengers?
Fake edit: I see what you mean now. One of the Hulk movies from 2003 and 2008 are not part of the MCU.
You wouldn't have that retort without Norton though
Norton didn't really have a Banner. He was just being Ed Norton. At least Ruffalo is doing something.I feel the opposite. I really liked Norton's Banner, I don't really like Ruffalo's.
Okay, gotcha.Norton/2008 is part of MCU. Tony Stark and the Super Soldier formula appear in it.
He had that reputation long before getting involved with Marvel.A lot of the Norton bashing I read seems kind of unsubstantiated gossiping. He's definitely a little bit of a chore, but some of the fake rumors people spread seem oddly defensive- like we should hate him for not sticking through Avengers of something.
Yeah it's quite old, but really, what's there to talk away from? Marvel/Feige have commented on how people loved Ruffalo's interpretation of Hulk and that a solo film is definitely not out of the cards. Ruffalo hasn't stated anything about leaving, hell he wants an "eco friendly" Hulk film.
We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title role of Bruce Banner in the Avengers. Our decision is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members. The Avengers demands players who thrive working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the iconic role in the coming weeks."
He demands that he be able to basically assistant direct any movie he is in. He's generally regarded as an asshole.
He demands that he be able to basically assistant direct any movie he is in. He's generally regarded as an asshole.
To those saying Edward Norton was a jerk to work with and was doing re-writes out of arrogance or selfish reasons:
http://www.slashfilm.com/the-truth-about-edward-norton-vs-marvel/
"At the meeting Norton offered his version of The Hulk story, and Marvel agreed to hire a screenwriter to work with him on a rewrite of Zak Penns draft. But no screenwriter was ever hired and Norton did a substantial page-one rewrite by himself."
"Marvel decided they wanted make a shorter, more action-packed cut of the film, discarding a lot of the character development pieces that Norton had brought to the screenplay."
"Norton was understandably pissed. He was brought onto the project under the premise that he would have considerable creative control. But the final cut was, of course, not his. Norton and Leterrier lobbied for a more nuanced cut of the film that ran about two hours and 15-20 minutes, but Marvel stuck to their guns."
So basically Marvel is the bad guy in this story.
To those saying Edward Norton was a jerk to work with and was doing re-writes out of arrogance or selfish reasons:
http://www.slashfilm.com/the-truth-about-edward-norton-vs-marvel/
"At the meeting Norton offered his version of The Hulk story, and Marvel agreed to hire a screenwriter to work with him on a rewrite of Zak Penns draft. But no screenwriter was ever hired and Norton did a substantial page-one rewrite by himself."
"Marvel decided they wanted make a shorter, more action-packed cut of the film, discarding a lot of the character development pieces that Norton had brought to the screenplay."
"Norton was understandably pissed. He was brought onto the project under the premise that he would have considerable creative control. But the final cut was, of course, not his. Norton and Leterrier lobbied for a more nuanced cut of the film that ran about two hours and 15-20 minutes, but Marvel stuck to their guns."
So basically Marvel is the bad guy in this story.
Because Bana Hulk's not MCU.Why not complain about Eric Bana while we're at it?
Yeah. You can easily see the Hulk, as a character, going either way, and Norton seemed to want to keep things a little more cerebral, whereas Marvel wanted to keep to the action a bit harder.
Norton hasn't really been starved for work since 2008, and I also don't think he's been gunning for $200 million budgeted movies either.
in that case i'm surprised he went through with the movie.
In the movie world, Avengers are people who don't play well together and are anti-authority, but are forced to assemble in a moment of crisis.The Marvel statement of his curb-stomping was hilariously catty
There's more irony. They include a bunch of homages to Bill Bixby Hulk but forgot the character development and tragedy elements.eyekantspele said:in that case i'm surprised he went through with the movie.
He was still under contract. Same way he got strong-armed into doing the Italian Job; he just sleep-walks through the movie.
In the movie world, Avengers are people who don't play well together and are anti-authority, but are forced to assemble in a moment of crisis.
In the real world, Avengers are people who fit the schedule and don't hassle the producers.
There's more irony. They include a bunch of homages to Bill Bixby Hulk but forgot the character development and tragedy elements.
Instead we got Liv Tyler yelling "Bruce!" a hundred times
In the real world, Avengers are people who fit the schedule and don't hassle the producers.
damn if Italian job was him sleep walking. i'm eager to see him wake up
After being in talks with him to get him back, which shows which of the two parties was being an asshole. The one that came out with a passive aggresive statement because they're cheapskates.Marvel even made a public passive aggressive statement about it. Specifically citing that they were dropping Norton not for monetary reasons, but because they want a "team player" basically.